Gadhafi regime crumbling...and fast

lol, nice comeback

 

Arabs across the middle east are sick and tired of watching their leaders sign deals and make agreements with the non-muslim infidels. These are the same muslims who took to the streets by the hundreds of thousands and cheered the collapse of the WTC. They don't want to be friends with the western world, they want us destroyed, period end of story. And they're methodically getting rid of any leader who stands in the way of jihad and the extermination of Israel.

 

The muslims are going to stick together because they all have the same enemy; the west. The people of the middle east are rising up and if their leaders aren't on board with jihad, they'll get rid of them.

That's why you see Karzai coming forward with statements like this because he knows if he doesn't he could be the next Gadhafi:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/24/w...ould-back-pakistan-in-a-conflict-with-us.html

 

No, he's not, but he knows if he doesn't get on board he could be the next fool drug behind a pickup truck and shot in the head.

 

For failing to make his allegiance clear.

 

I like this new tone from you, Baraka. It's much better than your ultra-serious persona.

Look, you need to be able to read between the lines. Not everything is black and white. And the simple fact that the first thing the new Libyan leadership does is enact Sharia law pretty much says it all.

 

Thanks. Obviously the Tunisians are infidels for having democratic elections (which hopefully results in a proper democratically-elected Government) and a Sharia Law-based constitution, at the same time.



Baraka_Guru:

Source: http://www.cfr.org/religion-and-politics/middle-east-islam-democracy/p7708#p1

 

You see, there's a reason why free nations have a separation between church and state. You do understand why nations do that, right? It's because subjecting citizens to a religious code is not freedom and it completely stifles democracy. These arabs don't understand that because they have no concept of freedom or democracy. They live in atmosphere of religious conformity and dogma not in an atmosphere of freedom of speech, thought or expression.

 

That wouldn't happen to be because their culture and politics are the direct products of their religion, could it?

 

That is the dumbest thing you've spouted on TFP so far, Eddie.

Karzai is deeply unpopular in Afghanistan. And his statement in support of Pakistan? Yeah, the Afghans are real happy about the prospect of helping their much-hated Muslim neighbour in the event of war with the US.

Really now? Long before Christians reached a state of "educational enlightenment" or the Secularists were able to turn many Christian countries secular, the Islamic world was the undisputed forefront for the existence and advancement of academic universities and science, by 1100 A.D.

Islam does not stifle knowledge (a high level of which needs the existence of freedom of thought), and it certainly does not stifle democracy.

I'm done responding to Eddie's uneducated, ill-informed and highly illogical conclusions in this Thread.

EDIT: As a parting gift to Eddie:

 

Gonna have to call b.s. on this one. And if you can't support your statement with at least...say...five issues that aren't related to islam, I'm giving myself another point.
--- merged: Oct 24, 2011 5:12 AM ---

Thanks for the purple smilie. I will cherish it always. lol