Fetish and reputation

is it as good as I'm thinking it is?

 

Being been away for a while, I forgot just how much I love you freaks.
The spanking of various sensitive bits drives Mrs Moose up the fucking wall. I wouldn't have thought it before trying it, but the way she twitches and moans makes me feel like some sort of hedonistic god.
Yeah. Is good stuff.

 

How about being I guess "molested" in your sleep ? I sort of want that ..depending on who of course and if done right ..I want a chick to just want to do it and hopefully think I'm asleep and I'll just play along ...

Is there anyway to get that to happen without really asking I want it unexpected ..which makes me think it's impossible...am I wrong ?

No not a joke idk why I even feell Ike it's happening some nights just Bc Im half asleep dreaming and all and I play along usually just my dck moving bc Im gettin hard and since I'm laying down my boxers are tighter so it feels like something touching me ...

It's sad it's the only thing I really dreamt of that I doubt will ever happen ..

 

communication with your significant other

 

Would ruin it tho .. I don't want planned or telling ..it's gotta be spontaneous so ...gonna be tough Id imagine ..I guess subtle hints but itll cheapen it for me massively .

 

Going through life expecting your partner to read your mind is generally going to lead to boring times. We've had some amazing sexual adventures, and none of them would have happened if I waited for it to be "spontaneous".

 

Whoa. Thanks. I could not imagine anything more directly relevant to this thread.

 

Whoa, dude. I've never been a big fan of Ghomeshi-- for some reason I've never been able to put my finger on, he just rubs me the wrong way a bit. But he clearly has always done a good job, and nobody should have to be summarily judged and fired for what they consensually do in their own private bedroom. Especially when the information about what they do in their own bedroom came to light because of lies and harrassment.

I am very disappointed in the CBC. I home Jian Ghomeshi finds another gig quickly, and is able to recover from this.

 

I think we need to remember that we have only really heard one side of the story here. It's my understanding that there is more to come. Gomeshi hired top PR firm Navigator to help him get out in front of this. His letter on Facebook was just the first salvo.

For the record, I am not ready to take a side in this. I need more information.

 

And here we start to see there might be more to the story:

LINK

 

Hmmm. Well, if true, that would be both awful and surprising. I have to admit, if he's really a violent abuser, he does a fantastically convincing job maintaining his public persona as a soft-spoken, progressive, promoter of tolerance and peaceful dialogue through art.

Still, you never know. People who have secret lives can be amazing actors to keep their secret. He would hardly be the first to pull of such a convincing charade in public while doing terrible things in private.

On the other hand, in his statement, Ghomeshi says that the CBC execs confidently said, after examining whatever evidence he felt he had to present, that they felt he always had consent. And he also points out that his accusers sought to go to the media rather than to the police, which I agree seems odd and suspicious. That being the case, I could wish that, rather than firing him on the spot, they had placed him on administrative leave while there was a formal inquiry.

If he is lying, and he was non-consensually violent, he should indeed be fired, and should be prosecuted as well; and I will be deeply disappointed in him.

However, if he is telling the truth, and he had consent, and is now having his name dragged through the mud for spite or other personal vendettas, then he should retain his job at CBC and his name be cleared.

What displeases me about this is the possibility that he might end up having told the truth and having had consent, but have been fired and lost his reputation because of rumor-mongering and slander.

 

It's dirty any way you look at it.

It's not clear and his classic PR move (spearheaded by Navigator) is muddying the water just as any good PR move should.

 

He's the host of a Canadian radio program on CBC Radio One that has been syndicated in the US via NPR.

He isn't really a celebrity, so much as he is a really good interviewer.

 

So this blogger is apparently a master kinkstress, and she evaluates the Ghomeshi incident as follows:

I find her analysis to be compelling. I am starting to question more and more that Ghomeshi is any kind of kinkster, but maybe is just another guy who tries to hide that he has a major problem conflating horniness and rage, most likely with a touch of misogyny.

How disappointing.