Do you care about the size of your balls?

I'm sorry that you don't see it that way, but I really don't have any other way of explaining it. Take care.

 

Instant thought was: "Moses supposes his roses has toeses but Moses supposes erroneously." which of course then smoothly transitions into the one better dance routines in the film.

 

umm.

you are free to think about myself in relation to your balls as much as you like.
but, for the record, i am swearing off all balls for the foreseeable future.
this here body is a ball-free zone.

 

I can't honestly say I pay much attention to mine, unless they are being fondled or whacked. Unfortunately, the latter seems much more frequent, these days.

 

Really, cynthetiq? Really?

C'mon, now... I have no frat boy lipstick and lingerie illusions about actual female homosexuals. Same-sex couples are just as boring.

I'm mildly offended.

Also: There are plenty of dirty old bastards on this board that you can tag for asinine comments like that.

...

Endless hours on motorcycle will do that. Especially a V-twin. I'm only pushing 1100ccs and using a fat saddle and my junk demands breaks.

 

Bikes and 'broads' can be tricky on the 'St Pauls' (balls).

 

It's probably more like a simple math problem.

 

no, no cooters, either. just me and me.

 

Yeah, your ass.

 

I was thinking more along these lines:

View: http://youtu.be/VvDzE6oDWM8

 

double ewwwww

 

Oddly enough, if this isn't a real product, it should be.

 

When my wife was shopping for a bike, they pointed her to one that had "less vibration". The first words out of her mouth were "Why the hell would I want that?".

 

My immediate answer is no.

My think-about-it answer is yes, a 30% reduction in testicle size isn't the that horribly bad. If, however, I was single and active in casual sex, I'd hope that word of the shrinkage was common knowledge, I wouldn't want to receive any "WTF?" looks.

A benefit--At that size my wife might be able suck on both of them at the same time.