08-27-2003, 06:04 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
Worst machinegun of the last 60 years. Thing operates like someone crossed a Chautchaut with an MG-34 prototype, drilled a few holes in it, and machined the action out of pot metal. Jams like mad after more than about 250 rounds, if it doesn't run away on you first, and the A3 model can only fire 150-200 rounds without the barrel trying to melt off because it's so thin. To change the barrel, you have to actually -touch- it, which is a great way to get 3rd-degree burns, and the sights have to be re-adjusted after each change, because all the sighting gear is on the barrel instead of the reciever. It shakes itself to death faster than a Corvair, and if you try and load it with the bolt any less than all the way back, it slam-fires and blows the operating rod into the action; takes a vise, an angle-grinder, and a winch to get the works out after a "blow forward" like this.
There's a reason the US and Phillipines are the only places that use this thing, while the rest of the western world uses the Mag-58 or a derivative. The M-60 is junk!
__________________
"I personally think that America's interests would be well served if after or at the time these clowns begin their revolting little hate crime the local police come in and cart them off on some trumped up charges or other. It is necessary in my opinion that America makes an example of them to the world." --Strange Famous, advocating the use of falsified charges in order to shut people up. |
08-27-2003, 03:03 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Sir, I have a plan...
Location: 38S NC20943324
|
While I do admit the weapon had some problems, I think The_Dunedan was a little less than charitable.
If kept properly lubricated, I never had trouble putting 1000's of rounds out of "the pig" before cleaning. Runaways were caused by a sear failure, not a very common occurance. I have never heard of the A3 model, but the E3 was designed to be a lightweight weapon. True, it could only fire 100 rpm sustained, but the barrel did have a handle to speed changes. Only the front sight is located on the barrel assembly, a trait common to every machine gun I have ever fired. I don't see how you could load one with the bolt forward. You cannot charge the weapon if the "tophat" is not in the feed tray timing channel, so you couldn't even pull the bolt back far enough to grab a round. All that being said, I do thing the M240B (that we now use) is a vastly superior weapon.
__________________
Fortunato became immured to the sound of the trowel after a while.
|
08-27-2003, 11:21 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
Has anybody seen anything on the new M-60 E4 ? I saw a video on it a few weeks back. Seems like they did a lot to the barrel to acutally make it last a lot longer. The video was a test they put it through, 850 rounds in a minute forty five. And they say they can put 15,000 rounds through the barrel until it needs changing. Thoughts?
|
08-28-2003, 08:11 AM | #8 (permalink) | |
Riiiiight........
|
Quote:
I've never used the M60 before, but as debaser has said, the FN MAG or the M240 and its various variants (like co-axials etc) is a VERY good weapon. |
|
08-28-2003, 09:03 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Upright
|
Quote:
that thing rips!!!! if you know more sites with videos like that please to tell! |
|
08-28-2003, 09:13 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Addict
|
The main page there with more videos is
http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/bl...er/videos.html The video showing them shoot 76mm High Impulse Weapon System is pretty funny. The guy keeps telling him to keep 80% of his weight on his front foot as he fires. Just watch it until the end and you will see. http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/bl...ideos/HIWS.wmv Last edited by Cobalt_60; 08-28-2003 at 09:20 PM.. |
04-05-2004, 08:52 AM | #19 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Flying over your house
|
The M-60 is outdated and heavy. The SAW was it's replacement and since then has been replaced, by what I can't remember. But isn't it wierd that the SAW rifle uses .223 (JUST A little bit larger than a .22) Obviously more gunpowder tho
__________________
I can't believe I ate the whole thing! |
04-06-2004, 12:27 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Addict
|
The M249 SAW was not the replacement for the M60. The M240G Medium Machine Gun manufactured by Fabrique Nationale replaced the M60 series.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m240g.htm After extensive operational and technical tests, the US Army has selected and type classified the M240B 7.62mm medium machine gun produced by Fabrique Nationale as a replacement for the M60 Series machine gun. This is a ground mounted variant of the original M240/M240C/M240E1 coaxial/pintle mounted machine gun used on M2/M3 Series Bradley Fighting Vehicles, the M1 Series Abrams tank, and the U.S. Marine Corps LAV-Series of Light Armored Vehicles. While possessing many of the same basic characteristics as the M60 Series medium machine guns, the durability of the M240 system results in superior reliability and maintainability when compared to the M60. Manufacturer: Fabrique Nationale Manufacturing, Inc. Length: 47.5 inches (120.65 centimeters) Weight: 24.2 pounds (10.99 kilograms) Bore diameter: 7.62mm (.308 inches) Maximum effective range: 1.1 miles (1.8 kilometers) on tripod mount Maximum range: 2.31 miles (3.725 kilometers) Rates of fire: Cyclic: 650-950 rounds per minute Rapid: 200 rounds per minute Sustained: 100 rounds per minute Unit Replacement Cost: $6,600 |
04-06-2004, 01:02 AM | #21 (permalink) | |
undead
Location: Duisburg, Germany
|
Quote:
__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death — Albert Einstein |
|
Tags |
m60 |
|
|