Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - Security/Encryption

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)

- Tilted Technology (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-technology/)

- - Security/Encryption - Is this website secure? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-technology/94108-security-encryption-website-secure.html)

cowudders14

08-30-2005 11:19 AM

Security/Encryption - Is this website secure?

Hi,

I need help understanding security etc.

This website: https://secure.firenet.uk.net/signup...band/index.asp gives a security error when viewed in Opera (8.02):

Quote:

Your communication with the server secure.firenet.uk.net is encrypted, but the presented certificate had errors:
An insecure encryption level was requested by the server.
Sending sensitive information through this connection is not safe!

Opera tells me the encryption protocal is "TLS v1.0 128 bit ARC4 (512 bit RSA/MD5)". Now, that's meaningless to me, but having a message such as "this website is not secure" pop up worries me. The admin of the site tells me it's perfectly secure and they pay a handsome sum to Thawte each year for it. So, which/who is right?

Help! :confused:

Thanks all!

Slavakion

08-30-2005 11:20 AM

I had no problems in Firefox or IE. Maybe Opera's trying to be a lot stricter about security.

Redlemon

08-30-2005 11:24 AM

Firefox* tells me that it is "High-grade Encryption (RC4 128 bit)", verified by Thawte. Sounds like Opera is mis-identifying the encryption. Firefox also will warn if a website is mixed encryption, and I didn't get a warning on that either.

*actually Deer Park, I run the nightly builds

cowudders14

08-30-2005 11:28 AM

How would opera mis-identify the encryption? Sorry again - I've no idea how to interperet it, but surely it's either secure to a high level or not. Is it possibly a bug in Opera that means it isn't happy to talk to the website at the higher level, so the website drops the encyption level to one it is happy to use, which Opera then tells me is unsafe? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick there?

Thanks!

Redlemon

08-30-2005 12:18 PM

Ah, got it. Here's a link from the My Opera Forums. The error is supposed to read "The site is using an outdated encryption method", but there was a last-minute bug. :rolleyes:

One thing that trips this message is a "RSA/DH keys shorter than 900 bits", and this one is only 512 bits.

Quote:

Several years ago a 512 bit RSA key was broken in, effectively, 10-12 weeks (they used 7-8 months computing by night on a few hundred workstations). Today the same job could probably be done in less than 4 weeks, possibly much less depending on how many computers you throw at it, and other improvements in the art of factoring large numbers). Since such a key is usually used for at least one year that means that keys of this length was no longer adequate protection for any information that needed to be kept secure for more than a few weeks.

I'd say, you are probably OK using this website. You might want to send the above link to the site admin for his comment, however.

cowudders14

08-31-2005 01:47 PM

Many thanks Redlemon - I'll get back to the admin and see what he says. That thread from opera forums will be very useful in explaining. Cheers!

Jinn	09-02-2005 12:23 PM

Quote:

As of 2005, the largest number factored by general-purpose methods was 663 bits long, using state-of-the-art distributed methods. RSA keys are typically 1024–2048 bits long. Some experts believe that 1024-bit keys may become breakable in the near term (though this is disputed); few see any way that 4096-bit keys could be broken in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is generally presumed that RSA is secure if n is sufficiently large. If n is 256 bits or shorter, it can be factored in a few hours on a personal computer, using software already freely available. If n is 512 bits or shorter, it can be factored by several hundred computers as of 1999. A theoretical hardware device named TWIRL and described by Shamir and Tromer in 2003 called into question the security of 1024 bit keys. It is currently recommended that n be at least 2048 bits long.

Honestly, 512-bit RSA keys are secure enough for anything non-corporate or non-government. However, in the next few years this may change. If you're really looking for an explanation of RSA (it's a really neat method for encryption) check out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsa

cowudders14

09-03-2005 09:40 AM

Interesting read! Thanks!

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360