Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Technology (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-technology/)
-   -   WinXP mouse pointer too slow? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-technology/76457-winxp-mouse-pointer-too-slow.html)

KnifeMissile 11-19-2004 12:39 AM

WinXP mouse pointer too slow?
 
I like to have a very sensitive mouse because I strive to have the mouse pointer move with as little effort from me as possible. If I could, I'd have a neural interface with my computer so I just have to think commands and they happen.

Anyway, it looks like WinXP has gone the way of the Mac (once again) and made their mouse pointer so slow that even on full speed, I still find it rather sluggish. Win2000's mouse pointer was way too fast at full speed and that's the way it should be! What happened to flexability?

Does anyone know how to increase the mouse sensitivity in WinXP, beyond what is possible with the default install? Does anyone else feel the same way about their mouse pointers?

WillyPete 11-19-2004 01:52 AM

Which Mouse software are you using?

I know Intellipoint 5 had trouble with Firefox scrolling and the latest one (5.2 i think) has a lot more features. Probably better speed.

Have you turned up the 'acceleration' too?

Lasereth 11-19-2004 02:39 AM

Jesus. I have mine set 2 or 3 notches from the max and it's perfectly fine! Any faster than that and my performance would start to go down drastically. I know that having a lower resolution makes mice appear to move slower so increasing the resolution may help out a bit. I'm still baffled that the default Windows XP max is too slow for you. :thumbsup:

-Lasereth

KnifeMissile 11-19-2004 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lasereth
Jesus. I have mine set 2 or 3 notches from the max and it's perfectly fine! Any faster than that and my performance would start to go down drastically. I know that having a lower resolution makes mice appear to move slower so increasing the resolution may help out a bit. I'm still baffled that the default Windows XP max is too slow for you.

Well, it might help you understand my predicament if you read my thread, Weird cheap video card quirk. If your mouse has to traverse that much realestate, you need it to be fast! Remember, I'm trying to simulate moving the mouse pointer without having to move my hand... If you do it, yourself, it will be weird at first (correcting and over-correcting yourself) but (like FPSs), with a little practice, you'll get good at it!

To tell you the truth, it was a gradual thing. Start off with something just a little bit more sensitive than you're used to and, eventually, you get used to it. Then, you increase it one notch more (literally), and use that until you get used to it, etc... But now that Microsoft has lowered their mouse sensitivities, I feel like I'll develop carpal tunnel syndrome using this thing...

KnifeMissile 11-24-2004 04:46 PM

Okay, I'm really starting to get pissed off. I'm developing carpal tunnel syndrome and, for some reason, progress means less choices.

Out of all the geeks who frequent the TFP, is there no one who appreciates a "psychic mouse?" Is there really no way to increase the mouse speed in WindowsXP? I'm very dissapointed...

Thanks for all your help...

littlebighead 11-26-2004 04:52 AM

What kind of mouse is it?
 
Just curious, what kind of mouse is it? Is it a problem with the OS, or the hardware? Also, back in the Win98 days, I found that using a PS/2 style mouse was faster than using the same mouse in the USB connector. Maybe because the PS/2 port uses hardware interrupts, or because USB is so busy.

todd 11-26-2004 09:43 AM

Also, is it a ball mouse or optical? I have no idea which is faster, but maybe try the opposite of what you have now and see if you notice any differance. Are you using something differant than what you were when you use Win2000?

KnifeMissile 11-26-2004 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by littlebighead
Just curious, what kind of mouse is it? Is it a problem with the OS, or the hardware? Also, back in the Win98 days, I found that using a PS/2 style mouse was faster than using the same mouse in the USB connector. Maybe because the PS/2 port uses hardware interrupts, or because USB is so busy.

It's the simplest Microsoft optical mouse that one could find on the market, four years ago. It really looks like an OS issue but I guess I will try using the PS/2 port instead of USB. You never know...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360