Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2004, 06:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gentlemen Farmer
 
j8ear's Avatar
 
Location: Middle of nowhere, Jersey
Digital 8 versus MiniDV

I'm thinking of picking up a sweet, carl ziess lensed, Sony digital 8 camcorder. Does both digital and analog. It's a DCR TRV 250

Retail, 500.00

My price, 275.00

Entry level camera with exceptional optics, 20x zoom, 700digital, has RCA and usb2/FW outputs, and uses a small proprietary tape.

Doesn't have flash or mic inputs, and view finder is bw. LCD is small but probably excellent none the less.

Apparently though this format is destined to wind up on the betamax heap with a bunch of other not adopted formats?

I'm thinking this does everything I could imagine a camcorder to do, and regardless of the extinction of new Digital8 camera's, this is always best transferred to a different format anyway, whether, some video stream for the internet, or a DVD/VCD for the DVD player. I should be able to use this forever, provided it doesn't break.

Right?

Anything I haven't considered, or any strong arguments for spending another 100 bucks for the Canon opt10 miniDV camcorder?

All thoughts, research, experience, and knowledge welcome.

Cheers,

-bear
__________________
It's alot easier to ask for forgiveness then it is to ask for permission.
j8ear is offline  
Old 04-02-2004, 11:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Long Island
The main difference between Mini DV and Digital 8 is the tape size. Digital 8 was intended to be an easy way for 8mm/Hi8 users to move to digital. The specs of the format it's self are very similar to Mini DV. The cameras are only consumer grade entry level cameras but produce good images if used properly.

In my experience, the MiniDV format surpasses the Digital 8 format to a certain degree. On a standard, midrange Digital 8 the picture quality is visualy exactly the same as that of a standard, midrange MiniDV, however MiniDV has one feature that I have as of yet to see on a Digital 8 camcorder-Progressive Scan frames. This feature gives your videos a much more professional look when watched on a television monitor, as it appears quite similar to motion picture film. This is the only real difference I can see between the two different formats, so if you can find a camera with Progressve Scan mode, get it.....it's worth the extra bucks.

Here is a link to help some more.

http://hometheater.about.com/library.../aa020300b.htm
__________________
"A friend with weed is a friend indeed"
agball is offline  
Old 04-02-2004, 11:30 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
I'd find a miniDV camera. It's gonna be around for awhile, and digi8 probably isn't. plus, nearly all miniDV cameras will plug into your computer via firewire or usb for easy editing of your videos. 8's often don't have that capability.

FYI b/w viewfinders are better. They're sharper than color so you can focus better with them.
shakran is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 10:17 AM   #4 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Toronto
Don't get hyped into the digital zoom numbers, regardless of how many "times" the digital zoom can go, it still sucks. Its no better than opening a picture in photoshop and just zooming in. The pixels just keep getting biggerand bigger until that bodacious babe on the far side of the beach becomes a blurry mass that looks several times uglier than she should.
Furthermore, if Digital8 is a failing format, how much longer will the tapes be sold? Theres nothing like having a company pull the rug out from beneath you just as you invest in their technology.
wakelagger is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 12:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
Digital 8 was and is a good "bridge" solution for people straddling the analog and digital world. If you already had old-fashion 8mm or Hi-8 tapes, a digital 8 camera with firewire can play them, encode them digitally and send the digital output to your machine. So you can then edit the tape digitially. It can also work as a pass-thru between your computer and other analog devices. For example, if you have VHS tapes that you want to export digitally, you can hook the VHS deck up to the Digital 8 camera and then hook the Digital 8 firewire cable to the computer. The Digital 8 camera (or at least some of them) will take the VHS input, encode it digitally and send it on to your computer.

But if you don't have that need, I wouldn't go with digital 8. Frankly, mini-DV-format camcorders of reasonable competence are now on sale in the low 300s, and while mini-DV will not be around forever, it will be around longer than Digital 8, which is solely a creature of Sony and will abandoned unceremoniously one day without warning (Sony's way). MiniDV is (for now) an industry standard.

Like others say, I wouldn't obsess on the lens much. Digital zoom just gives you a bigger picture with less detail, and it's a bugger to keep the camera steady enough when it's zoomed out 30x or more, unless you're using a tripod. If you ever plan on doing video at a party or gathering with a lot of people, you should get a model with an external mike jack. The condenser mike on cheap cameras can just go crazy in a crowd. A good-enough mike is relatively cheap. Also a good idea if you want to tape something/someone you can't get near, like somebody speaking at a podium to a crowd. You can put the mike on the podium and stand back with your camera a reasonable distance.
Rodney is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 07:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
first off, the lens is extremely important. It's a lot more important than the digital zoom number, which as has been mentioned, is essentially bullshit.

Zeiss lenses are extremely good for consumer lenses. They won't begin to approach the quality of prosumer or professional lenses, but then TV stations routinely pay well more than $10,000 for a lens.

btw, a few tips. Always use a tripod. Very few people outside of the television industry are good enough to make a video steady enough to not look like shit. If you have to follow action around, put the camera on the tripod, then hold the tripod's head and run the camera that way - the legs hanging down form a counterweight, and you have a poor man's steadi-cam.

if you have to shoot off the sticks, RELAX. The more tense you are, the more you jerk. Breathe with your stomach, you'll be steadier. If you're following someone, match footsteps with them - their left to your left, etc. That will eliminate the swaying you get from walking.

Avoid pans and zooms they almost always look like crap. Hold your shots. Don't shoot one thing for 2 seconds, then zip off to something else. Count to at least ten with EVERY shot you make.

Above all, remember that you're telling a story, not just fucking around with a camera. As such, figure out what that story will be and shoot accordingly.
shakran is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 09:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
Quote:
Originally posted by shakran

Avoid pans and zooms they almost always look like crap. Hold your shots. Don't shoot one thing for 2 seconds, then zip off to something else. Count to at least ten with EVERY shot you make.
I did find one way to get a good pan without the tripod set up, though I've only tried it with smaller cameras: with the tripod attached to the camera, jam the tripod handle under one armpit and pin the tripod to your body with that arm. Operate the camera with your opposite arm and hand. The tripod and camera are temporarily an integral part of your torso. If your turn your torso steadily from side to side, the camera will move as you do and you'll get a pretty steady pan.
Rodney is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 10:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gentlemen Farmer
 
j8ear's Avatar
 
Location: Middle of nowhere, Jersey
Thanks for the input.

I'm aware of the limitations (read:worthlessness) of digital zoom and was particularly attracted to the 20x OPTICAL zoom of this camera. Can't find anything with a fixed lens that does as well.

Also, I do have a good stock of legacy hi8 and other 8mm analog footage that will be well handled by the Digital8.

I think that's what I'm gonna go for.

First camcorder purchase for me, so it seems like a good way to get an excellent quality recorder, at an awesome price.

One day I'll pick up a canon xl1 miniDV bad boy

Really appreciate the photog advice as well. I am huge tripod (or monopod) fan.

Thanks Again,

-bear
__________________
It's alot easier to ask for forgiveness then it is to ask for permission.
j8ear is offline  
Old 04-03-2004, 11:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
T

One day I'll pick up a canon xl1 miniDV bad boy

-bear
Yer welcome. But I'll save you a grand or more, some time in the future, and tell you to go with the GL1 unless you need audio line input or removable lenses.
Rodney is offline  
 

Tags
digital, minidv, versus

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360