Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-13-2004, 01:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: New Orleans/Oakland/San Diego/Chicago
Asus KT600. How does it measure up?

I was thinking about starting off with a Asus A7V8X-X Socket A motherboard and pairing it with either an AMD Athlon XP 3000+ "Barton", 400 FSB, 512K Cache Processor or a AMD Athlon XP 2500+ "Barton", 333 FSB, 512K Cache Processor .

I have a few questions... What is the difference between the 64-bit and the 32-bit processors? And what are some opinions about the motherboard CPU combo I have chosen versus other combos?

Id like to spend under 800 to build the whole thing and itll be used for gaming and video/audio editing.
__________________
"Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don't allow our enemies to have guns, why should we allow them to have ideas?"

- Joseph Stalin

Last edited by iamjero; 02-13-2004 at 01:54 PM..
iamjero is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 03:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: Paradise
The consensus here is to get the Abit NF7-S instead... if you are gonna overclock that 2500+ to 3200+ speeds to save money.

I know that Asus makes good boards, and I've used em and never had any trouble (never had trouble with Abit either), but based on the extensive reviews I've done building my new computer I can't see why you would go w/ the Asus over the Abit board.

As for the 64bit vs. 32bit, I assume that the 64 bit makes use of 64 bit registers and instructions. Remember, w/ the 386 they introduced extended registers that could hold 32 bits, but the sx version cheated and sent info in 16 bits 2x (is that right?--memory's fuzzy). 64 bit isn't gonna help you in 32 bit xp, but they do have a *gasp* experimental version of windows that you can dl and beta test.
cheesemoney is offline  
Old 02-13-2004, 04:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: back to my old location
Quote:
Originally posted by cheesemoney
The consensus here is to get the Abit NF7-S instead... if you are gonna overclock that 2500+ to 3200+ speeds to save money.

I know that Asus makes good boards, and I've used em and never had any trouble (never had trouble with Abit either), but based on the extensive reviews I've done building my new computer I can't see why you would go w/ the Asus over the Abit board.

As for the 64bit vs. 32bit, I assume that the 64 bit makes use of 64 bit registers and instructions. Remember, w/ the 386 they introduced extended registers that could hold 32 bits, but the sx version cheated and sent info in 16 bits 2x (is that right?--memory's fuzzy). 64 bit isn't gonna help you in 32 bit xp, but they do have a *gasp* experimental version of windows that you can dl and beta test.
If 64 bit doesn't help, then why does the FX-51 perform better than Intel's PIV's?

I'd go with the 64 bit 3000-3200, if you could afford it

Last edited by VF19; 02-13-2004 at 04:03 PM..
VF19 is offline  
Old 02-14-2004, 08:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
42, baby!
 
Dragonlich's Avatar
 
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally posted by VF19
If 64 bit doesn't help, then why does the FX-51 perform better than Intel's PIV's?
Because it's a better processor, with other features (*besides* the 64 bit stuff) that makes it faster.
Dragonlich is offline  
 

Tags
asus, kt600, measure


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54