|
02-08-2006, 07:07 AM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Unbelievable
Location: Grants Pass OR
|
From what i read, the biggest difference between the two is how much memory the processors can support, and the opteron can be used in 1, 2, 4, or 8 processor set ups where the 64 can only be used in single processor setups. If your not going to run over 4 gig of RAM and not going to be running multiple processors (I can't really think of a reason a gaming rig would need more than 4 gig or more than one higher end processor), then go with the 64
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 08:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Junkie
Location: San Francisco
|
No, Opteron is designed for servers that need lots of CPUs and the various memories.
__________________
"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded." --Abraham Lincoln Last edited by n0nsensical; 02-11-2006 at 12:15 AM.. Reason: add sig |
|
|
|
02-11-2006, 03:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Psycho
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
Quote:
the 940's CAN support more than 1 processor. 140-154 - single core, 1-way (meaning 1 processor only) 165-180 - dual core, 1-way 240-254 - single core, 2-way (meaning 2 processors) 265-280 - dual core, 2-way 840-854 - single core, 8-way (meaning up to 8 processors) 865-880 - dual core, 8-way the 939's are a different story. they only come in the 1xx series...so only one processor per system. these opterons work on MOST 939 boards, but you'll probably need a bios update. also, the 939 opterons also support regular pc3200 memory, while the 940's require ECC memory. so, with the 939 opterons, you'll be getting a max of 4gigs. but...back to the question: the socket 939 Opteron 165 is the best equivalent to the x2 3800. they have two differences. 165 - 1.8Ghz, 2x1Mb Cache x2 3800 - 2.0Ghx, 2x512Kb Cache the two perform just about the same though. the only real reason to go for the 165 is if you are looking to overclock. these guys are a beast, and can frequently hit 2.6+Ghz, which would be like having the FX-60 (dual core, 2.6Ghz, 2x1Mb). you'd have a $1000 processor for a fraction of the price. i would definately go dual core for a new system. |
|
|
|
|
02-23-2006, 12:56 PM
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Adequate
Location: In my angry-dome.
|
asudevil, or anyone else, any experience with dual 265's on various boards? Stability, memory compatibility, voltage & frequency controls, etc. My own setup will be cautiously maximized for mysql, file, and builds. I do need to test a couple configurations (workstation vs. big RAID) so may just order & experiment.
I do not work with enough SMP boxes these days. 
__________________
There are a vast number of people who are uninformed and heavily propagandized, but fundamentally decent. The propaganda that inundates them is effective when unchallenged, but much of it goes only skin deep. If they can be brought to raise questions and apply their decent instincts and basic intelligence, many people quickly escape the confines of the doctrinal system and are willing to do something to help others who are really suffering and oppressed." -Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, p. 195 |
|
|
| Tags |
| athlon, opertron |
|
|
