01-14-2005, 10:41 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Hoosier State
|
New reply first
I was thinking if it would be better to show newest reply first when reading replies? I often check replies on topics I have previously viewed. I think it's more convenient to list newer replies. Some topics have 3 or more pages full of replies, it'd be quicker to view the ones I haven't if they are added to the top of page.
|
01-14-2005, 10:44 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Submit to me, you know you want to
Location: Lilburn, Ga
|
If you do like I do and use the view new posts feature and then click the button next to the thread name it takes you immediately to the first reply you havent read.
__________________
I want the diabetic plan that comes with rollover carbs. I dont like the unused one expiring at midnite!! |
01-14-2005, 10:39 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Addict
|
But what about the people who haven't read any of the posts yet? Then they have to try and read everything backwards. It's easier for you to click once and go to the last post than it is for someone to read three pages backwards.
__________________
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day. Calvin |
01-28-2005, 02:41 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Zeroed In
Location: CA
|
Quote:
I meant like if the column headers were clickable and then you could click it and sort either newest to oldest or oldest to newest.
__________________
"Like liquid white from fallen glass, Nothing to cry over" |
|
Tags |
reply |
|
|