Northcutt files grievence against Browns - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

djtestudo · 04-10-2004, 01:36 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1779049

Quote:

ESPN.com news services

CLEVELAND -- Wide receiver Dennis Northcutt has filed a grievance against the Cleveland Browns, the team he has been trying to leave since his agent failed to meet a deadline to make him a free agent.

Browns spokesman Todd Stewart confirmed Friday that Northcutt's agent, Jerome Stanley, filed the grievance.

Stanley claims the Browns did not bargain with Northcutt in good faith. The agent also claims the team breached Northcutt's contract.

The Browns deny the claims.

"There's absolutely no justification whatsoever for a grievance," Browns president Carmen Policy told The Plain Dealer of Cleveland. "Where's the breach of a contract? We didn't have a contract [after Feb. 19]. It expired. And we bargained right up until that deadline, so I don't see how that's bargaining in bad faith."

Northcutt's right to free agency was nullified when Stanley missed a Feb. 19 deadline to void the last three years of his contract. The Browns gave Stanley permission to seek a trade, but he has been frustrated by their reluctance to trade with division rival Baltimore Ravens.

The same thing occurred with another wide receiver, Terrell Owens, whose agent failed to nullify the final years of his contract with San Francisco on time.

The 49ers then traded him to Baltimore and Owens filed a grievance.

The case was finally settled with Owens being declared a free agent and signing with Philadelphia. The Eagles sent defensive end Brandon Whiting to San Francisco and compensated the Ravens with a fifth-round draft choice.

Owens' situation -- similar to Northcutt's but with a slightly different deadline -- was supported by the players union. Stanley said he has appealed to Gene Upshaw, executive director of the union, for help.

"He's talked to the Browns and tried to reach out," Stanley told The Plain Dealer.

Basically, Northcutt had an out clause in his contract if he met certain goals. His agent claims that an "administrative error" occured and they didn't meet the February 19 deadline. They have been trying to negotiate with the Browns, but the talks are collapsing.

I post this because, in the wake of the Terrell Owens fiasco, it's nice to see a receiver actually want to come to Baltimore so bad he claims he won't report anywhere else.

BadForm · 04-12-2004, 06:12 PM

From everything that has been reported - he has absolutely no case. Northcutt seems to hope that he can get his way like TO did if he complains enough. If he wants out of Cleveland, he will have to do it on their terms - and of course they don't want to give the Ravens a player that fufills their biggest needs.

crewsor · 04-13-2004, 01:33 PM

From all reports prior to T.O.s hearing, everyone said he had no case either. Boy that tune changed in a hurry once the case was presented.

I'm pretty sure he won't be back with Cleveland next year, if for no reason other than he doesn't want to be there. An unhappy player can wreak havoc on a team, so they'll most likely dump him somehow. Thats why I wasn't too disappointed to lose T.O.

I would be surprised if they let him come to the Ravens for anything less than a second round pick, which isn't likely to happen.

djtestudo · 04-14-2004, 12:21 PM

I'd give up a second for him, as long as we got a good pick from Cleveland, say a second next year or third this year. He's ready to break out.

queedo · 04-16-2004, 02:32 PM

I think Cleveland should keep him and let him sit out a year if he is going to be a baby. Perhaps that will stop this new trend of dictating your own terms when you are under contract!

04-13-2004, 01:33 PM	#3 (permalink)
crewsor Women want me. Men fear me. Location: Maryland,USA	From all reports prior to T.O.s hearing, everyone said he had no case either. Boy that tune changed in a hurry once the case was presented. I'm pretty sure he won't be back with Cleveland next year, if for no reason other than he doesn't want to be there. An unhappy player can wreak havoc on a team, so they'll most likely dump him somehow. Thats why I wasn't too disappointed to lose T.O. I would be surprised if they let him come to the Ravens for anything less than a second round pick, which isn't likely to happen. __________________ We all have wings, some of us just don't know why.

04-14-2004, 12:21 PM	#4 (permalink)
djtestudo Baltimoron Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD	I'd give up a second for him, as long as we got a good pick from Cleveland, say a second next year or third this year. He's ready to break out. __________________ "Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun

04-16-2004, 02:32 PM	#5 (permalink)
queedo Shodan	I think Cleveland should keep him and let him sit out a year if he is going to be a baby. Perhaps that will stop this new trend of dictating your own terms when you are under contract! __________________ If you think you can or you can't, you are right!

04-12-2004, 06:12 PM	#2 (permalink)
BadForm Crazy Location: In an office with no windows	From everything that has been reported - he has absolutely no case. Northcutt seems to hope that he can get his way like TO did if he complains enough. If he wants out of Cleveland, he will have to do it on their terms - and of course they don't want to give the Ravens a player that fufills their biggest needs.