Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Sports (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sports/)
-   -   Brunell to Redskins...almost (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sports/44757-brunell-redskins-almost.html)

wrongfullyaccuzd 02-07-2004 01:03 PM

Brunell to Redskins...almost
 
ESPN story

The Redskins are close to trading for Brunell. It's clear to me this is a good move for the Jags who need to move on to Leftwich permanently, and it's not worth a QB controversy or even ill winds to keep Brunell around as a backup. My question is, what is Dan Snyder's motivation here? Is he going to bring Brunell in as a backup for Ramsey, although Hasselbeck did an admirable job as backup last year? Or does Gibbs want a veteran so bad that he's going to sit the promising (not to mention local favorite) Ramsey and let Brunell lead? There have been whispers around here about the big-spending Snyder pursuing TO, will this help?
Talk!

AL9045 02-07-2004 02:24 PM

He won't start.

That would stunt Ramsey's growth.

Strange Famous 02-07-2004 03:33 PM

Brunell would definitely be a started at Washington imo, and I think its a really good signing... a lot of people are going to want him.

Strange Famous 02-07-2004 03:36 PM

Also, I heard that TO is going to Philly.

archer2371 02-07-2004 08:05 PM

I've heard from people in the Dallas Cowboys organization that Parcells really wants Brunell. He fits the mold that Parcells wants, big, strong, has a good head on his shoulders, and plus he's the Aikman type QB, and fans in Dallas would recognize this and more and more support would come in. If Dallas got Brunell, I don't think that they would have to worry about drafting a QB, they just gotta draft an RB, and they'll be set to make a damn good playoff run.

MontanaXVI 02-07-2004 09:17 PM

I do not like this move if it infact does happen, Ramsey did good last year dealing with the injuries and such, the lack of a line and running game he did show somw flashes, they need to work with him some more, i am pretty sure if Coles stays healthy they find a running game and a line that can block they do not need Brunell.......


being a niners fan i do not want to see T.O. go however Philly after they shitty performance in the NFC championship game finally realizes it is time to get a real receiver might not be a bad fit, thought Terrell has openly stated he would not mind playing with Vick in Atlanta and with the niners D-coord now the head coach that might be something to look at.

djtestudo 02-07-2004 10:01 PM

I hate the Redskins, and definatly want to see them suck, but even I have to say this would be a terrible move for them. Ramsey was looking good; he just had some bad players around him on OL and in the backfield.

At least Steinbrenner improved his team in the decade after he bought it...Snyder can't even do that.

JoeyB 02-08-2004 04:44 PM

Picking up Brunell 5 years ago would be a good move.

If Dan Snyder picks up Brunell NOW and starts him ahead of Ramsey, he's going to set his team back 5 years.

AL9045 02-08-2004 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by djtestudo
I hate the Redskins, and definatly want to see them suck, but even I have to say this would be a terrible move for them. Ramsey was looking good; he just had some bad players around him on OL and in the backfield.

At least Steinbrenner improved his team in the decade after he bought it...Snyder can't even do that.

He's still got 5 years left in this decade. Hohoho. :D.

Jephree 02-08-2004 07:53 PM

Jacksonville's done if this trade takes place

wrongfullyaccuzd 02-09-2004 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jephree
Jacksonville's done if this trade takes place
It's been clear since early this past year that Brunell was gone from Jax at the end of this year. They're going with Leftwich head first.

quest1mark 02-09-2004 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jephree
Jacksonville's done if this trade takes place
i dont think so....we have a really young defense who just started getting used to del rio's system midway through the season, we have one of the best o-lines in the league, and we have a sophomore qb who has a knack for the game.

the buzz over here in jacksonville is that san diego and miami are also interested. but jacksonville cant make a move till after march 3rd when the nfl season officially kicks off again. the jag organization wants to hold out as long as possible for probably a first round pick for him, but its not likely. mark on the other hand wants to stay in florida and retire in jacksonville...and thats not likely either.

bt8624 02-10-2004 11:37 AM

I think brunell has some left in him....but not in Washington... ican see somewher like Dallas, but Ramsey and him would just go back and forth ....imo.

JoeyB 02-10-2004 12:02 PM

I don't think Brunell is the best fit in Washington, but I think Joe Gibbs has earned the benefit of the doubt. This is a man who won a Super Bowl with Mark Rypien as his QB.

You win 3 titles with 3 different quarterbacks----I trust you.

BadForm 02-11-2004 12:00 AM

Horrible move for Washington - Ramsey has looked solid when he isn't be sacked by the entire opposing defensive line. The Redskins have more pressing needs, and very few draft picks. After a year off plus his aging and injuries, I doubt Brunell will be as effective as he was earlier in his career.

Perhaps they are just trying to drive up the price for Dallas?

johnsmith 02-11-2004 07:49 AM

I think that Brunell would be a better fit in Dallas, but I have also heard Miami is interested. I think Jacksonville will be fine, they finished strong this season and may actually have Jimmy Smith, Kevin Johnson, and Fred Taylor all on the field at the same time for Leftwich to work with. Add that to a solid, young defense and you have a wild-card contender. Hell, they may finish ahead of the Titans, who have major cap and free agency issues.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360