Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2003, 06:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Surviving Hurricanes
 
SAM821's Avatar
 
Location: Miami, Florida
Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl!?!?

I think this sucks.... but then again.... i would LOVE to watch OU destroy Ohio State.... I really think USC deserves the chance....

it really doesnt matter though, OU looks unstoppable...

But i will be rooting for Michigan to finally knock of Ohio State....
SAM821 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 06:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
Michigan will the fuck the hell out of Ohio State. No fuckin way in fuckin hell is ohio state going to get past michigan in anne harbor.

I predict a BLOW-OUT
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 06:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Why wouldn't Ohio State get the chance to play in the Sugar if they defeat Michigan? Ohio State should get some credit for playing a tough schedule while USC beats up on the Arizona's of the world.

If all else is equal (one loss apiece), shouldn't the team with the most impressive victories (best schedule strength) get the nod?
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 06:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Dude

I predict a BLOW-OUT
You've been predicting an Ohio State loss for the last five weeks at least. If you keep it up, you'll eventually be right.
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 06:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Wow, Dude instead of me getting mad and yelling at you, I want you to do alittle homework. You said the bucks are going to get "blown-out" Well to me that means a loss of at least 3 tds. So I would like you to find out when was the last time OSU was beat by at least 21 points. I am sure this may take some time, I mean its not like you can look this year and find a 65-13 loss.
__________________
It's hard to remember we're alive for the first time
It's hard to remember we're alive for the last time
It's hard to remember to live before you die
It's hard to remember that our lives are such a short time
It's hard to remember when it takes such a long time

phyzix525 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 06:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
Sat, Aug 30 Washington W 28-9 --
Sat, Sep 6 San Diego State W 16-13 -- 3 pts
Sat, Sep 13 North Carolina State W 44-38 -- 6 pts
Sat, Sep 20 (22) Bowling Green W 24-17 -- 7 pts
Sat, Sep 27 Northwestern W 20-0 --
Sat, Oct 11 at Wisconsin L 10-17 -- Loss
Sat, Oct 18 (17) Iowa W 19-10 -- 9 pts
Sat, Oct 25 at Indiana W 35-6 --
Sat, Nov 1 at Penn State W 21-20 -- 1 pt
Sat, Nov 8 Michigan State W 33-23 -- 10 pts
Sat, Nov 15 (16) Purdue W 16-13 -- 3 pts

and michigan will be the best team that they will play this season.

Ohio state offense is 102th in the nation, with 348 yards/game.

they do have the 8th best defense in the nation though.

you have to put up some points to beat michigan @ michgan.


----------------

I admit that i have been predicting losses to ohio state against every decent team that they have played, and i have been wrong most of the time.

i have a gut feeling for this game though.

and no, nobody can match 63-13 (well, wait a&m can 77-0)
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 06:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
Surviving Hurricanes
 
SAM821's Avatar
 
Location: Miami, Florida
I'll give OSU credit for that... they are always in the game... but really, theyve been VERY VERY fortunate the last couple of years.... man, things have luckily and mystically gone there way.... lady luck is definitly on there side

with that said, if they win out, then they deserve to be there.... so we will see...
SAM821 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 07:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Virginia
All teams use luck.

No one goes to the championship game without any, except for maybe OU this year, because they're raping the shit out of everyone.
AL9045 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 07:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: too far from Texas
no team... not even Oklahoma... will blow out the Buckeyes! their defense is simply too good for that to happen.

I do think Michigan will win, but it will be close!
bond007 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 07:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Surviving Hurricanes
 
SAM821's Avatar
 
Location: Miami, Florida
yea but... OSU.... luck is an understatement... i mean how many games have they come back to win, or barely pulled off at the end of the game, the last couple of years....

they won, so they deserve it... but damn.... just there luck
SAM821 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 07:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Dallas TX
Quote:
Originally posted by bond007
no team... not even Oklahoma... will blow out the Buckeyes! their defense is simply too good for that to happen.
Give Stoops more than 1 week to prep for a team, and we see what happens. I'd say OU would beat them by at least 21. OU is too versatile, and always makes the plays they needs when they need.
Jaiddin is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 08:03 PM   #12 (permalink)
Llama
 
goddfather40's Avatar
 
Location: Cali-for-nye-a
Quote:
Originally posted by gov135
Why wouldn't Ohio State get the chance to play in the Sugar if they defeat Michigan? Ohio State should get some credit for playing a tough schedule while USC beats up on the Arizona's of the world.

If all else is equal (one loss apiece), shouldn't the team with the most impressive victories (best schedule strength) get the nod?
And USC could help the fact that they played Arizona? Just like Ohio State could help that they played Indiana and Northwestern? They are conference games they play every year, they're unavoidable. OSU is lucky they don't have to play Illinois this year.

Let's look at the non-conference schedules. For OSU, it was Washington, San Diego State, North Carolina State, and Bowling Green. For USC, it was Auburn, Hawaii, BYU, and Notre Dame. They're fairly comparable. OSU is soooo lucky too that Bowling Green is ranked this year.

No matter how we dissect this, it just is more evidence that we NEED a friggin playoff system, NOW.
__________________
My name is goddfather40 and I approved this message.

I got ho's and I got bitches,
In C++ I branch with switches

-MC Plus+
goddfather40 is offline  
Old 11-17-2003, 10:48 PM   #13 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: Paradise
In U$C's defense, the best team they played this team was Cal, and the best team Ohio State played this year was Wisconsin...
cheesemoney is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 06:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
Boy am I horny today
 
absorbentishe's Avatar
 
Location: T O L E D O, Toledo!!
Sorry, got to do this...

<B>Go Bucks</B>.

Now that I got that out of my system, it's going to be a close game up north this weekend. Don't count the bucks out yet. They have a very good D, and the offence moves the ball just enough. Tressel is not the type of coach to blow any team out, and likes to keep the games close. Although, my blood pressure couldn't take this last game against PU.
absorbentishe is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 06:59 AM   #15 (permalink)
Insane
 
I'm going to say it too... Go Bucks!

Until Coach Tressel loses a Michigan game, I'm betting on him. I think he has the Wolverines right where he wants them.

Still I have a hard time believing this team, with no real offense, can win its way through a Mich St/Purdue/Mich finish. That would be something.

One additional point. The Buckeye loss to Wisconsin was in Madison on a cold Saturday night in a pouring rain storm. Perfect weather for an upset.

It's going to be fun on Saturday.

Thanks for listening.
wwcd101 is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 07:10 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
if they beat michagian they desever to go to the suguar bowl

you beat 7 ranked oppents over the corse of the year you should play in the championship game
dragon2fire is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 07:59 AM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally posted by goddfather40
And USC could help the fact that they played Arizona? Just like Ohio State could help that they played Indiana and Northwestern? They are conference games they play every year, they're unavoidable. OSU is lucky they don't have to play Illinois this year.

Let's look at the non-conference schedules. For OSU, it was Washington, San Diego State, North Carolina State, and Bowling Green. For USC, it was Auburn, Hawaii, BYU, and Notre Dame. They're fairly comparable. OSU is soooo lucky too that Bowling Green is ranked this year.
SOS is a compenent assigned on an overall basis. Putting together USC's opponents, USC has the weakest schedule in the BCS top-thirteen other than TCU and LSU. I'm not complaining about USC playing Arizona, I'm pointing out that USC has played a season full of Arizonas.

If Michigan beats Ohio State, I'll argue for USC to play in the big game instead of LSU for the same reason.

I just don't like it when Kansas State plays noone yet is rewarded year after year. If you look at KSU in the polls, they are a top twenty team. But they have lost three and have played noone. I don't like rewarding teams that schedule weakly over those who have played tougher opponents. I'd never rank KSU above other three loss programs like Iowa, etc.
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 08:26 AM   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
skysooner's Avatar
 
Location: Oklahoma
Ohio State should be there if they beat Michigan. It doesn't matter who plays OU. Both teams have weaknesses that OU will exploit.
skysooner is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 09:40 AM   #19 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: I live where all the morons live
31-10 Michigan.


But if by chance OSU beats Michigan at the Big House...they definitely deserve the right to defend their championship.


Art
Artermis is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 02:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
Dumb all over...a little ugly on the side
 
Sion's Avatar
 
Location: In the room where the giant fire puffer works, and the torture never stops.
regarding OSU's tremendous "luck":

luck schmuck.

"I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have."
- Thomas Jefferson

"Luck is the residue of design."
- Branch Rickey

"We must believe in luck. For how else can we explain the success of those we don't like?"
-Jean Cocteau

"All of us have bad luck and good luck. The man who persists through the bad luck -- who keeps right on going -- is the man who is there when the good luck comes -- and is ready to receive it."
- Robert Collier

"A pound of pluck is worth a ton of luck."
- James A. Garfield

"Luck is a dividend of sweat. The more you sweat, the luckier you get."
- Ray Kroc

"I believe in luck. The harder I work the luckier I get."
- Sam Shoen

"I've found that luck is quite predictable. If you want more luck, take more chances. Be more active. Show up more often."
- Brian Tracy

"Success is just a matter of luck, all you need to do is ask a failure. History may be written by academics but it's rarely created by them."
- Source Unknown

"Luck? I don't know anything about luck. I've never banked on it, and I'm afraid of people who do. Luck to me is something else: hard work -- and realizing what is opportunity and what isn't."
- Lucille Ball

"Luck marches with those who give their very best."
- H. Jackson Brown Jr.

"There is no such thing as luck. It's a fancy name for being always at our duty, and so sure to be ready when good time comes."
- Edward G. Bulwer-Lytton

"What helps luck is a habit of watching for opportunities, of having a patient but restless mind, of sacrificing one's ease or vanity, or uniting a love of detail to foresight, and of passing through hard times bravely and cheerfully."
- Victor Cherbuliez

"Luck, bad if not good, will always be with us. But it has a way of favoring the intelligent and showing its back to the stupid."
- John Dewey

"Shallow people believe in luck and in circumstances; Strong people believe in cause and effect."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"Someone receives a promotion, gets an important assignment, makes a major discovery, or moves into the president's office. ''He's lucky,'' an envious person remarks. ''He gets the breaks; they're always in his favor.'' In reality, luck or the breaks of life had little or nothing to do with it. So-called ''luck'' usually is found at the exact point where preparation meets opportunity. For a time, an individual may get ahead by ''pull,'' but eventually someone with push will displace him. Success is not due to a fortuitous concourse of stars at our birth, but to a steady trail of sparks from the grindstone of hard work each day."
- Kenneth Hildebrand

"People who have attained things worth having in this world have worked while others have idled, have persevered while others gave up in despair, and have practiced early in life the valuable habits of self-denial, industry, and singleness of purpose. As a result, they enjoy in later life the success often erroneously attributed to good luck."
- Grenville Kleiser

"Good luck is the willing handmaid of a upright and energetic character, and conscientious observance of duty."
- James Russell Lowell

"Good luck is a lazy man's estimate of a worker's success."
- Source Unknown

"Luck always seems to be against the man who depends on it."
- Source Unknown



"Luck? Ain't no such animal."
-Sion
__________________
He's the best, of course, of all the worst.
Some wrong been done, he done it first. -fz

I jus' want ta thank you...falettinme...be mice elf...agin...
Sion is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 04:47 PM   #21 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: too far from Texas
I'm definitely rooting for the Buckeyes this weekend.

as for "luck"... hey, even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while! of course, it was probably a very hard working... albeit blind... squirrel, right?!?
bond007 is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 07:52 PM   #22 (permalink)
Llama
 
goddfather40's Avatar
 
Location: Cali-for-nye-a
Quote:
Originally posted by gov135
SOS is a compenent assigned on an overall basis. Putting together USC's opponents, USC has the weakest schedule in the BCS top-thirteen other than TCU and LSU. I'm not complaining about USC playing Arizona, I'm pointing out that USC has played a season full of Arizonas.

If Michigan beats Ohio State, I'll argue for USC to play in the big game instead of LSU for the same reason.

I just don't like it when Kansas State plays noone yet is rewarded year after year. If you look at KSU in the polls, they are a top twenty team. But they have lost three and have played noone. I don't like rewarding teams that schedule weakly over those who have played tougher opponents. I'd never rank KSU above other three loss programs like Iowa, etc.
Let me pose this question. What the heck is USC supposed to do about their schedule? Last year USC had the toughest schedule in the country while Ohio State had the 42nd strongest. In 2001, USC had the 20th toughest and Ohio State had the 38th. Those schedules are with many of the same teams as this year. I disagree with the drawing of a parallel with Kansas State, who I agree schedule pansies WAYYYY too much, but that is not the case with USC.

By the way, here's the link for the strength of schedule stats
http://www.phys.utk.edu/sorensen/cfr..._Schedule.html
__________________
My name is goddfather40 and I approved this message.

I got ho's and I got bitches,
In C++ I branch with switches

-MC Plus+
goddfather40 is offline  
Old 11-18-2003, 09:52 PM   #23 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: Paradise
$C.. was supposed to win out. For some reason the Cal Bears just like to bitch them around every year. What has OSU beat, but 7 ranked teams. #10 last week. If they beat #5, I guess they deserve to go Sugar Bowling. If not, I'll happily watch $C represent the Pac-10.

What are they supposed to do to improve strength of schedule? Well, they're supposed to schedule a tougher Non-Conference schedule.

As for those you you bagging on K-State--2 of their losses came without Roberson, so I'd argue that healthy as they are now, they deserve to be ranked, for they'd beat most teams ranked above them.
cheesemoney is offline  
Old 11-19-2003, 06:44 AM   #24 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Metro Detroit
I don't buy this whole "tressel is in Michigans head" ?? Can somebody explain this to me?? OSU is THE most overrated team in the top 10 and anyone who has watched their games knows this. Tressel wants to keep the games close??? Are you kidding me or is this how your defend your lame offense? You don't think Tressel wants a touchdown every time he gets the ball? Michigan will win this game, sure it might be close, but OSU will be exposed this weekend and should get a nice spot in the Outback Bowl!

GO BLUE!!!
Damnyankee is offline  
Old 11-19-2003, 08:17 AM   #25 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally posted by cheesemoney

What are they supposed to do to improve strength of schedule? Well, they're supposed to schedule a tougher Non-Conference schedule.
Exactly, goddfather. Mind you, no where will I say the system is fair, just that we need to work with what we have. While USC can't help Notre Dame and others fell on their faces, the truth is that these are simply not good ball clubs.

Ohio State has faced seven ranked teams this year, while USC has faced a Pac-10 filled with disappointments (Oregon, Oregon State, Washington, etc.)

Again, I'm not saying its fair or that anyone can actually DO anything about it. But the fact remains Ohio State has played superior opponents, and should get credit for toughter victories.

For the record, I think USC got a lot of credit for the schedule they played last year. Even with two defeats, they played in the BCS.

Last edited by gov135; 11-19-2003 at 08:21 AM..
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 03:44 PM   #26 (permalink)
The Northern Ward
 
Location: Columbus, Ohio
They've won so many games this way guys. After a while (18 or so games they've been winning like this?), you certainly have to wonder if maybe it's just a game strategy to run a conservative offense to avoid turnovers and take advantage of your opponents, rather then risk the long passes and such of a west coast offense.

Noone's that lucky, and against the teams they're playing? No way, I don't buy the luck thing for a second. Chalk it up to the defense and Tressel.
__________________
"I went shopping last night at like 1am. The place was empty and this old woman just making polite conversation said to me, 'where is everyone??' I replied, 'In bed, same place you and I should be!' Took me ten minutes to figure out why she gave me a dirty look." --Some guy
Phaenx is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 12:29 PM   #27 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
yeap, michigan just beat the fuck out of ohio state. the score doesnt reflect how one sided this game was.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 12:37 PM   #28 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Dude
yeap, michigan just beat the fuck out of ohio state. the score doesnt reflect how one sided this game was.
???????

I thought the game was close - Ohio State was within a touchdown for alot of the second half.

Something tells me The Dude has external motivation for wanting Ohio State to lose. Wonder what that would be?

Anyhow, Michigan turned the ball over once, Ohio State once late. It was a well played game. The difference was, in my opinion, Chris Perry. Perry was very effective despite getting banged up several times throughout.

That sends Michigan to the Rose Bowl - where they will meet one of several contenders - perhaps Washington State or Texas.
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 12:50 PM   #29 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally posted by gov135
I thought the game was close - Ohio State was within a touchdown for alot of the second half.
it was 28-7 in the 3rd quarter, when the 85 yard michigan td pass was called back. michigan defense relaxed up and let the buckeyes score.
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 12:56 PM   #30 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: I live where all the morons live
Come on Texas...dont lose to A&M..hehe



Art
Artermis is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 01:14 PM   #31 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally posted by Artermis
Come on Texas...dont lose to A&M..hehe
Artemis, I don't think you have a thing to worry about. I'm not sure what kind of excuse for football they've been playing in Aggie land, but its not the same brand of football we've seen in the past.

EDIT: This puts USC in the drivers seat for the Sugar Bowl. I will consider them the deserving candidate unless their SOS falls below LSU's.

Last edited by gov135; 11-22-2003 at 01:17 PM..
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 01:28 PM   #32 (permalink)
The GrandDaddy of them all!
 
The_Dude's Avatar
 
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally posted by gov135
Artemis, I don't think you have a thing to worry about. I'm not sure what kind of excuse for football they've been playing in Aggie land, but its not the same brand of football we've seen in the past.
They've officially changed "Wrecking Crew" title to "Wrecked Crew".

If you talk to an aggie, they will tell you how good they will be next year cuz of their redshirts . Its always a good laugh talking to an aggie.

----------

Looks like it'll be OU vs USC in the national championship game and USC will get blown out (as u can see i dont use the term "blown out" sparingly).
__________________
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Darrel K Royal
The_Dude is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 02:54 PM   #33 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Austin, Texas .. Y'all
I'm going to have to agree with the Dude on this one. The score was closer than the game was. It would have easily been 35-7 in the third quarterbut OSU got lucky and it was called back due to a penalty. Michigan was a far better team.

Now, about the BCS, the studio was talking about Michigan jumping over Texas in the BCS standings. If LSU got beat, then Michigan would play in the sugar bowl against Oklahoma (assuming they win out).

That would suck!
tj2001cobra is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 03:19 PM   #34 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: I live where all the morons live
I thought last week you guys were going to stomp TT and be no worries..missed xp and FG cost them the game.

Mack needs this win...he loses here and who knows what happens in the off season.

Art
Artermis is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 03:48 PM   #35 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: too far from Texas
if LSU wins the SEC title game, they will be in the Sugar Bowl.
bond007 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 04:48 PM   #36 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Quote:
if LSU wins the SEC title game, they will be in the Sugar Bowl.
No, if USC wins out LSU has no chance of getting into the Sugar bowl.
Rudel73 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 05:23 PM   #37 (permalink)
Junkie
 
gov135's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally posted by Rudel73
No, if USC wins out LSU has no chance of getting into the Sugar bowl.
I agree. And LSU wasn't exactly looking peachy - the kid from Ole Miss flat missed two field goals which would have sunk LSU.
gov135 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 05:47 PM   #38 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Rudel73
No, if USC wins out LSU has no chance of getting into the Sugar bowl.
I would put it at 50/50 LSU bypassing USC if LSU wins out. The computers are odd and you cannot really predict what will happen. Assuming LSU wins out, their SOS will go up a bit with wins at Ole Miss , Arkansas and Georgia. Although beating Georgia again will take away their quality win points. As for the Ole Miss game, our offense had a bad game and the defense won it for us. If the offense didn't play like total shit today, the game wouldn't have been close.
fearofmear is offline  
Old 11-23-2003, 09:35 AM   #39 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
I am looking toward a Texas Ohio state matchup in the fiesta bowl. OU vs LSU in sugar and Michigan vs USC in Rose. Sounds like three really good games!
__________________
It's hard to remember we're alive for the first time
It's hard to remember we're alive for the last time
It's hard to remember to live before you die
It's hard to remember that our lives are such a short time
It's hard to remember when it takes such a long time

phyzix525 is offline  
Old 11-24-2003, 06:26 AM   #40 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Metro Detroit
Oh man, what a game, go blue baby no sugar bowl for the Luckeyes!! Good run OSU, you made the big ten proud last year but don't ever forget who the kings of the Big 10 are!!!!

THE MICHIGAN WOLVERINES!!!!!
Damnyankee is offline  
 

Tags
bowl, ohio, state, sugar

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360