analog

The "trendy bisexual" girls are like that. Most of the normal bisexual girls i've met are not. Usually you see this in clubs and at parties, with the "OMG we're bi, let's go make out!" semi-bi trendy-bi chicks. In fact, i've noticed that the more "full-bi" a girl is, the less like the bisexual girls we're discussing they are (the "jump on anything" types), and the closer to the trendy-bi (won't do much sexual except grope and kiss) end of the spectrum, the more like the "jump on all girls" type they tend to be.

ruggerp11

Its about penetration, lol.

__________________
Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time and to its government when it deserves it.
--Mark Twain
Do What makes you happy
--Me
BUT!
"Happiness is the absence of the striving for happiness" - Chuang-Tzu

Ustwo

I have a lot of experiance with bi women and there are several kinds.

#1 Bi-curious: These are girls who may have thought about other girls, but are too shy to initate it on their own. They will often recieve sex from a female but not return the favor.

#2 Socially bi: They will be bi with the 'right' woman, aka a close friend. They don't go looking for women to have sex with.

#3 True Bi: man, woman, they don't care, they just want sex and how they approach that will be personality driven, though they do seem 'faster' with women.

#4 Bi-furious: These are basically married lesbians. They are very aggressive with each other and the mans just sorta there.

I sort of wonder if part of this aggresiveness you speak of is due to the nature of a homosexual realtionship vrs a heterosexual one. A heterosexual relationship has a lot more 'issues' than a homosexual one so you would go slower than with a homosexual relationship.

__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

cybersharp

I agree with all this completly, I agree with allot of the stuff Halx said too

__________________
0PtIcAl

Bryndian_Dhai

Actually, this isn't too far off. There is a school of thought, based on Kinsey's research, that I personally like a great deal, and explains a lot about the behaviour of some bisexual women.

0 Exclusively heterosexual: Capable of only physical and emotional attachments with people of the opposite sex. According to Kinsey, these folks are pretty rare
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual: Capable of only emotional attachments with people of the opposite sex, but admits some physical attraction for members of the same sex.
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual: Capable of only emotional attachments with people of the opposite sex, but is comfortable pursuing physical relationships with members of the same sex.
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual: Capable of emotional and physical attachments with members of either sex. This is where I sit. As does, apparently, OneSnowyOwl. Apparently, according to Kinsey, this degree is not particularly prevalent, either.
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual: Capable of only emotional attachments with people of the same sex, but admits some physical attraction for members of the opposite sex.
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual: Capable of only emotional attachments with people of the same sex, but is comfortable pursuing physical relationships with members of the opposite sex.
6 Exclusively homosexual: Capable of only physical and emotional attachments with people of the opposite sex. You'd think this one would be rare, too, as the extremes seem to be, but it is apparently not as rare as #1 and #3.

I think that Stompy has a point too:Although I disagree that there would be more "bi" men if women were more vocal about their interest in man on man action, society doesn't really provide for masculine security when it comes to homosexuality or bisexuality. Honestly, there is a much greater societal stigma on man on man action than on woman on woman action.

The thing is, a lot of women do it for the attention. Most of them fall into either #2 or #3 on the Kinsey scale, and with the stigma being so much less for female bisexuality (as long as they still like men, they're not abnormal), and there is a fascination with women who are sufficiently into exhibitionism to entertain the crowd with passionate displays with another woman. There is no pressure... They aren't expecting a relationship from their display. And men find that sort of display enticing, and I'm going to tell you that men, in general, are much more comfortable with the idea that their girl has been with other girls than they are with the idea that their girl has been with other men.

For me, its all about who I find attractive. I've never been particularly inhibited when it comes to expressing my attraction, so I've always been one to pursue the object of my attraction regardless of their gender. Men sometimes find it disconcerting... Y'all talk about wanting us to make the first move, and be clear about our motives, but the second we do, y'all freak out because we intimidate you. Or you think we're some kind of slut (see my above comment about men's thoughts about girls who've been with other guys). Women either a. freak out because they're straight and not interested in women, or b. return the favor and we have a lovely time and everything's wonderful. *grins* Sort of.

Ultimately, I think, it boils down to the fact that there's a difference, no matter whether or not you're straight, bi or gay, between trolling for sex and trolling for relationships.

__________________
“When facism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”
~Sinclair Lewis