08-17-2008, 09:33 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
Tilted
|
Quote:
i've done it doggy style with big women and i've had little problems. |
|
08-17-2008, 09:43 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: WA
|
edited the post
Girls with huge butts and thighs, your partner could have intercourse from the behind? The penetration is more sensual but difficult to do. Especially if the guy is slim compared to you. I realize it feels a lot good for the girl than the front missionary style... |
08-17-2008, 10:50 AM | #5 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: reykjavík, iceland
|
__________________
mother nature made the aeroplane, and the submarine sandwich, with the steady hands and dead eye of a remarkable sculptor. she shed her mountain turning training wheels, for the convenience of the moving sidewalk, that delivers the magnetic monkey children through the mouth of impossible calendar clock, into the devil's manhole cauldron. physics of a bicycle, isn't it remarkable? |
08-17-2008, 11:05 AM | #8 (permalink) |
has all her shots.
Location: Florida
|
I don't understand why the slimness of the male is relevant.
And if the woman spreads wide and splays, there shouldn't be a problem at all.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce |
08-18-2008, 03:58 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Tilted
|
He probably means that a large lady's butt and hips would get in the way of thrusting and hence good penetration. I don't see how though personally, since doggy style probably provides the easiest access to the vagina and thus good penetration. I'd think it would matter more if the men was overweight too, since his stomach might get in the way.
|
|
|