|
View Poll Results: Who is the next target? | |||
No one | 1 | 4.17% | |
Iran | 12 | 50.00% | |
Syria | 2 | 8.33% | |
North Korea | 1 | 4.17% | |
Canada | 8 | 33.33% | |
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
09-12-2004, 10:00 AM | #2 (permalink) |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
i'm abstaining from the poll. the way the question and leading post frame the poll... it seems to assume some premises i am uncomfortable starting from.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill |
09-12-2004, 10:56 AM | #4 (permalink) | |
Mencken
Location: College
|
Quote:
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention." |
|
09-12-2004, 11:28 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
Insane
Location: st. louis
|
Quote:
__________________
"The difference between commiment and involvment is like a ham and egg breakfast the chicken was involved but the pig was commited" "Thrice happy is the nation that has a glorious history. Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt |
|
09-12-2004, 12:40 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Mencken
Location: College
|
The problem is this whole premise that we're knocking over unfriendly countries one by one. It just isn't the case. There is no "next."
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention." |
09-12-2004, 12:51 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Kiss of Death
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
|
Iran is slightly different then Iraq. Change will come from within, people there are really starting to realize what's going down, especially after their last elections.
Seriously though they would be wise to keep their nuclear plans in check, I am just as afraid of Iran having nukes, if not more, then Korea. Also get your eff'ing hands out of Iraq.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition. |
09-12-2004, 01:20 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Lennonite Priest
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
|
Reminds me of the very hilarious movie Canadian Bacon (Micheal Moore directed it).
"In this wacky satire on the cold war mentality, the president of the United States and an arms manufacturer find it in their best economic interests to plant rumors of a potential nuclear attack--by Canada. Then, following a border incident at a hockey tournament, a patriotic sheriff and his deputies plan a counteroffensive...with hilarious results. Directed by activist-writer-television mogul Michael Moore, CANADIAN BACON combines the talents of John Candy and Dan Aykroyd with such actors and comedians as Steven Wright, Rip Torn, and James Belushi. The film is reminiscent of the terrific Peter Sellers vehicle THE MOUSE THAT ROARED, which dealt with the Duchy of Grand Fenwick declaring war on the United States in order to lose and receive millions in reparations." http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=info&id=1800241413 Very funny movie, one of John Candy's best and last. What they don't mention in the synopsis is that Canada doesn't realize what is going on. God have to rent that fast.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?" |
09-12-2004, 01:42 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Baltimoron
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
|
I won't vote in the poll, but I will answer the two questions posed.
1) I don't think we will attack anyone else first because we still have to finish in Iraq and Afghanistan, and second because other countries know to listen to us now, since we have shown a willingness to fight for our best interest. 2) If we do attack someone, it will be Syria. They have a similar government to the old Saddam regime, they have been an access point for militants to enter Iraq and fight us, and they may be where Iraq's fabled WMDs are. Plus, they are a smaller nation then Iraq, so we could possibly send troops from a stablized Iraq right on in as they are scheduled to leave. This is just my opinion, and I do believe we won't fight another war while Bush is President.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun |
09-12-2004, 01:56 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Banned from being Banned
Location: Donkey
|
Quote:
If you don't think we will, then vote "no one". [edit] I voted Iran, although it's a tie w/ Syria. Why? Because it's in the middle east. The general public is stupid, so it's much easier to convince them that Iran/Syria has Al Qaeda or "Terrorist" connections than it would be for North Korea. Although, I highly doubt we'd go after anyone. *If* we did, it'd most likely be one of those two.
__________________
I love lamp. Last edited by Stompy; 09-12-2004 at 01:59 PM.. |
|
|
|