![]() |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Loser
|
Because He Says So
This is about as good as it gets -
http://homepage.mac.com/njenson/movies/dsbush.html (embedded QT movie of a clip from The Daily Show's special access to the RNC America is Safer convention video) Last edited by OpieCunningham; 09-02-2004 at 05:37 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
Quote:
you realize that it's a comedy show... right? you realize that it used to be advertised as the "fake news" right? sometimes i think people forget it's entertainment not sober political analysis.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
Loser
|
You mean like that other station ... the Fair & Balanced one?
That The Daily Show uses comedy as a medium for expressing an opinion on politics does not make the opinion any less worthy than a channel like Fox News, which uses self-righteousness as a medium for expressing an opinion on politics. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Tone.
|
Well yes we do realize it's a comedy show. The comedy central logo on the screen was a clue. The laugh track reinforced our hypothesis.
However, just because it's presented in a funny manner doesn't mean they aren't pointing out inconsistancies. They didn't fake any of the video clips they used. Bush contradicts himself routinely, and so far they are the only media outlet that seems to be able to remember that what he said last week doesn't sound much like what he's saying this week. I'm happy someone's finally pointing it out. But yeah, it's a shame that the ones pointing it out have to be a comedy show rather than a political analysis show. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
yeah, i'm quite familiar with how this works.
comedy that reinforces preconcieved notions is proclaimed brilliant satire. that which does not is vulgar and juvenile. i say we pay less attention to comedy of any sort in politics. it doesn't usually "cut the crap" or "point out absurdity" as many like to think. what it does is take ideas and quotes out of context and confuses the electorate. democracy is no better because of the daily show. comedy has its place, but not the place of honor as it seems to be given.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
Muffled
Location: Camazotz
|
I think it's important to remember at this point that the Daily Show was the first to figure out that Pat Buchanan's speech at the '92 RNC was the death knell for the Republicans. Occasionally, they get it right. They may shoot for humor as well as edification, but they still tell the truth.
__________________
it's quiet in here |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
how can a show that was promoted as "fake news" still tell the truth? otherwise... wouldn't it just be "the news"?
sometimes it's truthful, sometimes it isn't. sometimes quotes are taken into context, oftentimes they aren't. sometimes the issues are real, sometimes they create something just for a laugh. the problem is that they don't distinguish between the two. they can't, or else it wouldn't be that funny. i'm honestly not proposing that the daily show or any other political comedy source has nothing pertinent to say. i watch the show, it's pretty damn funny. i'm saying that the electorate gets a disproportionate amount of their news and editorials from these sources. because these sources are concerned with entertainment, they aren't held to the same standards or bound by the same ethic that traditional journalists are (or supposed to be).
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |||
Loser
|
I don't think any show should be judged solely by its tagline.
Quote:
There are two different types of news - objective facts and opinions about those facts. To claim The Daily Show has less value than any other opinion news show is flawed - you're comparing opinions vs. opinions and declaring one the loser simply because it has comedy. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
you fail to see a difference? wow... ok
surely you'll grant me: most people aren't thrilled to talk fiscal policy, listening to a politician speak is often boring and time-consuming, people are very busy with their own lives, issues of substance are seldom entertaining. yet when people watch the daily show they are exposed to these issues but do not view them in their proper context. yeah, they hear about the mr. politicians tax proposal... but they hear about it from a comedian who spends 25 seconds telling jokes about it. if a well-informed electorate is essential to a healthy democracy then how can we legitimize this format as a method of understanding our world? is politics, by nature, entertaining? how about international policy? warfare? abortion? taxes? if the answer to one of these is "no", then you must concede that something vital is lost when they are converted into entertainment. we need to step back and give less creedence to comedians and entertainers. the daily show is not a legitimate source of news. news sources of it's like are fun to watch, but should not be given as much serious weight as it seems to have garnered in the past 10 or 15 years. the real issues aren't as compelling as jon stewart portrays them, but perhaps toughing it out a bit to hear more about major issues from cspan is what it takes to make the right choices.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill Last edited by irateplatypus; 09-02-2004 at 07:32 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
Tone.
|
i don't think anyone's trying to say that 1) the daily show is a real newscast or 2) that the video in this thread is an objective news piece. We all realize that the daily show is a comedic parody of a newscast and that the video in this thread is an anti-bush video.
Those facts do not make the video any less truthful however. Bush did say all of those things. They didn't make any of that up. They simply contrasted his inconsistant statements. This is an opinion piece. No one is saying it's an objective news piece. You're involved in an argument that does not exist. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
can't help but laugh
Location: dar al-harb
|
shakran,
"Those facts do not make the video any less truthful however." "This is an opinion piece. No one is saying it's an objective news piece." i'm not saying you can't do it, but those two statements appear to be difficult to reconcile. are we into truthful opinions? if it's a truthful opinion... doesn't that make it a fact? how can it be truthful and not objective?
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. ~ Winston Churchill |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) | |||
Loser
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I will agree that there is one major difference: Fox News pretends to be conveying the truth. The Daily Show makes no such hypocritical claim. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | ||
Tone.
|
Quote:
I like the sky because it is blue. It's an opinion statement that also has a true fact in it - the blue sky. This is an opinion piece that uses true facts to make its point. So yes, it can be true while still being an opinion. oh, and Quote:
Last edited by shakran; 09-02-2004 at 07:57 PM.. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
I thought this was brilliant. I thought it was very honest too. Comedy is sometimes the clearest of truths. Regardless of the fact that the Daily Show bills itself as fake news, it does not mean that what is said on the show is absolute shit. I believe that if you hold the standards of such a show rigidly to the guidelines of it's genre, you are flat out lying to yourself. As if every point made by this piece is now null and void simply because of the medium it was presented in. PLEASE.
I'm waiting for a bush-backer to come out and say, "Yes, he did say all of that. No, none of the important points were taken out of context." C'mon... it's ok to admit you're wrong sometimes.
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] Last edited by Halx; 09-03-2004 at 12:46 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 (permalink) |
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
Location: Grantville, Pa
|
You need to look at the Daily Show as a News Journal like 60 Minutes rather than the nightly news or CNN/FOX
I find it to be refreshing and accurate because it doesn't even try to uphold the bullshit "journalistic professionalism" that we have these days. They aren't afraid to mock stupidity. In this culture of ADD, you need to be blunt because otherwise many people just won't pick up on it. |
![]() |
|
|