|
View Poll Results: Who would your appointee be? If your party isn't here, say so and I'll add it | |||
Republican: Bush/Cheney | 15 | 28.85% | |
Democrat: Kerry/Edwards | 16 | 30.77% | |
Reform: Nader/Camejo (edited) | 4 | 7.69% | |
Libertarian: Badnarik/Campagna | 11 | 21.15% | |
Socialist: Brown/Herbert | 4 | 7.69% | |
Green: Cobb/LaMarche (new) | 2 | 3.85% | |
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
08-06-2004, 10:04 PM | #1 (permalink) |
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
Forget elections, who would you appoint? (read the full question first)
Ok, we know that fear of throwing the election off prevents many people from voting third-party. What I want to know is, If your vote was the only one that would count in the election, which pair of candidates would you appoint to the office of U.S. President?
If you don't see your choice here, don't compromise and vote for someone else, let us know who you want to see in office and I'll add your candidates to the poll. I would choose the same ticket that I plan to vote for, and put the Libertarian party in office. Last edited by MSD; 08-06-2004 at 10:09 PM.. |
08-06-2004, 10:29 PM | #2 (permalink) |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
I don't think that I've been bashful as to the fact that I believe very strongly in Libertarian principle.
For me...it's no contest. Badnarik gets the Oval Office.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
08-06-2004, 10:52 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Huzzah for Welcome Week, Much beer shall I imbibe.
Location: UCSB
|
I would go with the socialist party. They have a libertarian view on most social issues but an inverse view on economics compared to most libertarians.
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect. Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum: "Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt." |
08-06-2004, 11:38 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Insane
|
Well I hate Bush but I am pro-free market and I want a president who will take the defense of my country seriously (among other things).
Everyone else here is too far to the left for my liking. Kerry is basically a socialist. So...I'd vote for Bush. However...if I could pick two other politicians I liked and elect them instead, I would do so. Rudy Giuliani sounds good to me |
08-07-2004, 02:57 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
how about Anti-Partisan: Hal
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
08-07-2004, 05:54 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
Quote:
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
|
08-07-2004, 07:03 AM | #12 (permalink) |
I change
Location: USA
|
I have a great deal of confidence in the President, I think he's a good, solid, honest person, and I will be voting to reelect him. This is a vote for the President and a vote for realism - and it is a vote against media influence in our political process and delusional thinking. Also, I will always oppose Libertarianism, as I see it as simple me-ism - with no pragmatic component at all.
__________________
create evolution |
08-07-2004, 04:03 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: South Carolina
|
I have to admit that i used to be a proponent for the Libertarians, but as i really sat down adn thought about it, i dont htink they would make a good party for the country. It is very idealistic without the realistic component and i don't think it would work very well in practice....
I also cannot have bush in office anymore as i think he has done too much damage... nader just pisses me off anymore, I don't even know where he stands I didn't think a socialist was on the ballot, but is 'brown' "Harry brown" that used to be libertarian? All in all, i'd still put kerry/edwards in office. Actually, fuckit, i'd honestly put Jesse Ventura in office if i could.
__________________
Live. Chris |
08-07-2004, 06:02 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
The sky calls to us ...
Super Moderator
Location: CT
|
Quote:
|
|
08-07-2004, 06:13 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Huzzah for Welcome Week, Much beer shall I imbibe.
Location: UCSB
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect. Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum: "Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt." |
|
Tags |
appoint, elections, forget, full, question, read |
|
|