onetime2

to get around campaign finance reform measures since Kerry's fundraising is approaching par with Bush? If the only reason to use them was really because Bush had such a huge warchest (as was touted ad infinitum by the talking heads) shouldn't they now stop using them (or at least cut back their efforts) since the Kerry organization is becoming a fund raising juggernaut as well?

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/....ap/index.html

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

lurkette

That would assume a spirit of "fair play" on both parts that can't be assumed in our political process, unfortunately. As long as it's technically legal, whether it's ethical or not, both parties/candidates will use every advantage they can. I do wish that soft money would be spent more on voter registration/education than on television advertising, but unfortunately the ads are what get peoples' attention and stick with them.

__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France

Lebell

Considering the MoveOn is largely funded by billionaire George Soros, whose avowed goal is anyone but Bush, the Dems pretty much were on par.

__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!

Superbelt

Well add in groups like Club for Growth and others like the ones funded by Soros' polar opposite, Richard Melon Scaife, and it looks like MoveOn has it's hands full just evening out with the other partisan orgs.

mml

There are a myriad of groups on both sides that do the same thing as Move On. Superbelt mentioned Club for Growth, but you could add any number of others (the NRA is planning to get even heavier into the act and has started its own internet radio station to get out the word) Onetime2 if you truly have an issue with these types of groups, you should get on the campaign finance reform bandwagon and/or condemn organizations that support your viewpoint as well as those that do not.

P.S. I don't generally support Move On, but I support their right to say what they think.

__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
-Douglas Adams

onetime2

Interesting that you assume I agree with the other groups that are doing it. I have been for campaign finance reform long before I ever ventured into this forum and have made plenty of posts toward that end.

My point was, and remains, that the Democrats claimed the ONLY reason they had to resort to such tactics was the HUGE difference in fundraising between Bush and Kerry (regardless of the fact that the 9+ candidate field is the reason fund raising was slow in the beginning for most campaigns). Now that the gap has decreased their reason is gone. If this was Bush's team doing it people would be crying LOOK THEY LIED AGAIN.

While the NRA is a favored example it is far different from Move On and its ilk. The NRA was formed and remains dedicated to the cause of gun ownership. Move On and others are created purely to combat the Republican Party and more specifically George Bush.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

Superbelt

Well, Bush STILL has an 80 mill cash advantage.

And as MoveOn is specifically to assist democrats and tear down republicans Club For Growth is specifically to attack democrats and moderate republicans. (Arlen Specter etc.)

So, really these things balance out. You can't ask "us" to call for MoveOn to disband and desist while groups like Club for Growth can go around and slander candidates.

Really, What the fuck? At least MoveOn acts like adults. CFG seems like it's written and spearheaded by grade schoolers.

pan6467

I'm sure Move On will move on as soon as Bush stops using his power for personal gain.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

HarmlessRabbit

I am a democrat, and I have never claimed this. Perhaps you have a source?

fuzyfuzer

i think he is probably guessing it would happen looking at past responses to presidential policies

i think everyone here has seen the proof and it goes both ways so no one is innocent

__________________
"The difference between commiment and involvment is like a ham and egg breakfast the chicken was involved but the pig was commited"

"Thrice happy is the nation that has a glorious history. Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt

Lebell

How is Bush using his power for personal gain (I mean more than Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, etc did)?

__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!

pan6467

In my personal opinion? A war for oil and to avenge daddy, where every single reason he claims is later rebuked and claimed never to have been said. Policies that are made behind closed doors with no notes and executives of those benefitting most present (granted every president probably has done this but he got caught same as Nixon.)

Just 2 examples.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

seretogis

I'm sure pan6467 will post some facts to back this up as soon as he/she stops posting one-liners that are impossible to back up with facts.

__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames

pan6467

Did right above your post. **Apparently I don't know what flaming is, or that we don't do that here.**

Let's see, you want facts?

first there was the "he was involved with 9/11, then the administration backed down real fast when no proof was found,

then there was imminent danger and when that was found to be BS they very quickly denied ever saying or insinuating it,

then there was WMD's and when none were found they denied ever using that as a reason,

Then we had Saddam was a dictator who killed millions of his own people. Which if that is the reason then why do we not go after Nigeria, N. Korea, China and other dictators just as bad or worse?

Meanwhile Halliburton and Carlyle get richer and so does the family.

Making policies while the top execs of the companies affected sit in (most of whom donated heavily to his election campaign, AEP, FirstEnergy, ENRON etc). Then claim they do not have to turn over those records at all. Won't even admit as to who was there.

And by the way, I never claimed Clinton, Bush 1, or no other president didn't abuse his power, just this one is more blatant about it.

So do you want me to post links to each one of those facts? They have been posted I'm sure quite often here but I will if you so desire Seretogis. I mean after all don't want to strain your time by having to do research.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

seretogis

In order for something to be a fact, it must be proven. What you have is a collection of conspiracy theories and examples of an obese government double-talking the public as usual.

__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames

onetime2

My use of the term "Democrats" in my posts would have been better stated as "Democratic Leadership". It was done constantly on the news programs when there was a focus on how these "new" Democratic groups (The Media Fund, Americans Coming Together, Move On, etc) were circumventing the campaign finance reform laws.

I am certainly not saying the Republican Party is innocent in 527 group abuse but am particularly annoyed by the acceptance of a blatant effort to get around the McCain Feingold Act which so many "leaders" trumpeted their support for. While many politicians have been forced through public pressure to disband the 527 organizations they created in the past to support their reelection, these major organizations are quietly being accepted by the DNC and the Kerry campaign.

I have no doubt that the RNC will do the same thing should their complaint with the FEC about these groups be dismissed or it becomes politically expedient for them. And when it happens I will gladly denounce the practice. The failure to denounce these groups will only serve to allow them to multiply.

http://www.nrsc.org/nrscweb/daschle_...rticle59.shtml

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

onetime2

Per the article, Bush had $185 million banked over the past year or more but has spent one third of it. That brings him down to about $120 million. Kerry earned $80 million this year alone putting the two pretty much on par. Throw in the money that the 527 groups have spent against Bush and what Kerry spent himself prior to this year and it's either a wash or spending in support of Kerry may be over the top of spending in support of Bush.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

smooth

That's over a 43 million dollar gap...if anyone else followed the math of your figures.

__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman

pan6467

You're right the administration was never recorded making any one of those claims.

So then perhaps you'll tell me what the facts are that demonstrates this is a just war and NOT Bush abusing his power for profit and vengence?

After all you won't accept my facts so I would like to hear you tell me the facts so I am educated?

Perhaps you'll enlighten me as to how a president can make policy behind closed doors with the people who would profit most by his policies, and then refuse to divulge there even was a meeting to the public?

Perhaps you can save the taxpayers the millions of dollars the lawsuit is costing by telling us exactly how that is not abusing power and that it is legal and the meetings even tho affecting public policy have no right to be known by the people?

Perhaps instead of attacking me you'll supply "facts".

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

irateplatypus

you two will never agree to a shared criteria of what a "just war" is.

facts are irrelevant as long as the definition of what constitutes a just action is not similar.

__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

~ Winston Churchill

onetime2

Umm yeah but it's not 80 million as described and it isn't that big of a gap when you throw in the money spent by the 527 organizations already as pointed out in the post. So, they are essentially on equal footings now.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

Superbelt

How do you know the gap was minimized by the 527's?
The 527's aren't one way. They are, as said, on both sides. So I think they even out each other if anything.

So that still leaves over 43 mill gap,

pan6467

Amazing isn't it?

We talk about which candidate has more millions while schools go bankrupt, people can't afford healthcare and everything is being outsourced.

Gotta love where the priorities are in this country.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

Superbelt

This country should mandate that any national party who wants to field a candidate must be on the ballot in at least 45 states. Then you get money from the Fed to field your campaign. Live within that. 527's and other ancillary orgs are gone and all are prohibited from releasing any advertisements in support of or against a candidate. That includes entertainers who want to talk about a candidate for more than 20 minutes in a day in an election year (6 months before the election).

True news organizations are allowed to report but the FCC should monitor them to look for any blatant politicing going on. And that should be brough before a special judiciary panel.

-----Of course this isn't complete and should be worked out somehow, but it's as good a base as any to work off of.-----

onetime2

They are not equal on both sides that's why the gap decreases. If that weren't the case then how could the supporters of the Democratic 527s listed above make the claim that they are being used to even the field?

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

onetime2

The last thing schools need is more money. They need to become efficient first and foremost. Ahh nevermind, there's little point in debating these things again.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

Superbelt

Because it sounds good? It's inspiring.
Do you have any statistics either way that the democratic 527's are outspending their republican counterparts?

onetime2

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Mar23.html

An excerpt:

and

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

mml

onetime2, I was not implying anything in regards to you in particlular, you have made it clear that you are for campaign finance reform. My issue lies with the fact that regardless of numbers both sides use 527's. The NRA was just a quick example that came to mind because I had just seen a report on it, and to be fair LaPeirre and his crew have made it abundantly clear that they are working to get President Bush reelected. Also, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a group who gets together to foment change. That is the essence of MoveOn, it is just that the change they seek is who resides in the White House.

One issue that has not been addressed, is the fact that the Democratic Party and the Kerry campaign do not have control over how the 527 money is spent, and this prevents them from setting a clear, focused message to the public like the Bush campaign has done so successfully. Don't get me wrong, they would rather have the 527's out there than not having them at all, but they would much rather be in Bush's shoes.

onetime2

The NRA is not the same as MoveOn et al. They are two separate types of groups. Notice I haven't dug on the AFL CIO either? That's because they are equivalent to the NRA.

As far as the argument that the lack of coordination between the DNC and the Kerry campaign puts them at some sort of disadvantage that's completely off the mark, IMO. They are at least as well organized if not more organized than the Bush campaign. This arrangement lets the 527s act as attack dogs while the Kerry campaign can appear above the fray. And when certain aspects of the 527's strategy pan out, the Kerry campaign can capitalize on them while letting the failed efforts falter without the campaign getting the blame for a failed strategy.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

Lebell

One of the reasons Soros donated so much money to campaign finance "reform" is that is penalizes groups like the NRA, while NOT penalizing 527s, like MoveOn (which he gives millions too).

In other words, he wanted to squash other's rights to political speech while preserving his own, which is why I think he is a bastard scum.

__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!

mml

I think you are getting caught up in semantics. I do not think MoveOn and the NRA are the same. They are vastly different, but to simply say that the poor downtrodden Republicans have no one out there helping Bush get reelected is a complete farce. Has the Democratic party done a better job than the Republicans in regards to 527s? Yes they have - necessity is the mother of invention.

As far as the "message" issue, we can agree to dissagree on that one and I guess well find out in November. I do know that several friends who work on the Kerry campaign have said that while the do like the support, they often have to go "off message" to address isssues that the various 527's have brought up in a commercial and they believe it is part of what is preventing Kerry from getting out a complete message to the American public.

pan6467

I was just saying there is so much more we can do to make people's lives better and more fulfilling and making the country better than to watch these candidates spend millions feeding a media machine that greedily accepts their money. And the media then reports how campaign financing is evil.

My opinion all candidates and issues should be allotted the same amount of time and billboard space as a public service. How hard would it be to say Kerry gets 3 ads and Bush gets 3 ads during primetime. Each is 1 minute in length and each candidate gets alternating half hours.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

onetime2

My point is not and has never been that the "Republicans have no on out there helping Bush get reelected". The point, per the title of the thread and the messages contained within it, is that the Dems pointed to the 527 organizations they created as being necessary to level the playing field and that if they weren't so behind in donations they wouldn't be using them. Recent statements by Democratic leaders and independent analyses by non partisan groups agree that the playing field is at the very least equal. Argue all you want for campaign finance reform but without arguing against this practice the words are hollow.

If the Kerry campaign, its supporters, and the DNC were truly interested in campaign finance reform they would not "like the support" the 527s provide. They'd be opposed to their creation and opposed to the unlimited individual contributions currently accepted by them. They had the opportunity to proclaim these groups in violation of the tenets of campaign finance reform but they chose not to. It's another example of politicians putting their own immediate needs above the beliefs they allegedly hold. (And I'm sure the Republicans will follow suit by creating more 527 groups in response when their complaint(s) don't yield results). The fact that Democratic supporters created and funded these groups put the onus on the DNC and its leadership. If the shoe was on the other foot and it was the Republicans being the first to use these tactics to such an extent I'd be blasting them the same way.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

onetime2

Damn it pan stop it! I can't possibly be expected to refrain from questioning my place in the universe when I agree with you twice in one week.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

pan6467

It is scary. I'll have to go find 2 threads I can disagree with you on.... thereby eliminating this meeting of the minds we are having.

What scares me more is I'm starting to see agreeable qualities in Irate.

What a freaky 3 some that is.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"

mml

I commend your allegiance to campaign finance reform, and to a certain degree I agree with you. I, however, am a pragmatist and not as much of an idealist as you. If the law allows 527's and my candidate needs their assistance, I am all for it. I have an extreme level of discomfort (nicest words I can use) with President Bush and his Administration, so I will look to any support I can get to remove them from power.

As far as your original question about whether they should cut out 527 fundraising or at least curtail them, obviously I believe the answer is no. But it is a valid question. I don't think that the Bush Administration is going to quit doing fundraising, and while Kerry is doing a respectable job raking in the cash(mine included), I would personally advise him (if he were ever to ask me) to continue to distance himself from some of the more radical ones, stay on his own message and reap the benefits.

All this being said, I guess I am part of the problem with campaign finance reform, but I will suffer with that scarlet letter until President Bush is out of office.

nuff said, thanks for reading

onetime2

So approving of tactics that are potentially illegal (and without a doubt in opposition to Kerry's own stated beliefs) are fine because the end justifies the means. Got it. I would have respected Kerry a lot more if he stood up and said that these groups fly in the face of campaign finance reform and they shouldn't be tolerated. Leadership is following principles and setting good precedents not succumbing to the pressure to take the easy route.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

smooth

I laugh my ass off whenever someone claims they would have respected or otherwise supported someone for something that didn't happen when everyone else realizes there no way the person would have done so.

It's like when my mom used to say, if you hadn't sneaked that cookie earlier, I would have bought you ice-cream for desert.

The point is, when someone is looking for a reason not to like someone or give that person something, they are going to find a reason somewhere eventually.

__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman

HarmlessRabbit

I don't understand. Is anyone in government claiming that 527's are illegal? I thought the argument, at best, was that the loophole should be closed.

I found a nice list of 527's:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/527/s...exp&sub=topcom

While there is no shortage of liberal/democratic groups, there are certainly a lot of republican/conservative groups in there as well.

So, how did this become a Democratic issue? The Republicans appear to be using the 527's as well, and have been for years.