Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Ascroft is out of control (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/47204-ascroft-out-control.html)

txlovely 02-27-2004 03:26 PM

Ashcroft is out of control
 
Quote:

Justice subpoenas Planned Parenthood records
Part of government defense in partial-birth lawsuitsThe Associated Press
Updated: 11:01 a.m. ET Feb. 27, 2004

WASHINGTON - The Justice Department has subpoenaed hundreds of medical records from six Planned Parenthood sites as part of the government’s defense in lawsuits challenging the Partial-Birth Abortion Act.

According to court documents, Justice Department lawyers say the records — which would be edited to remove names and other personal information — are essential to defend the law against the lawsuits brought by Planned Parenthood and doctor groups around the country.

The suits challenge the law that prohibits a procedure referred to by critics as partial-birth abortion but by medical organizations as “intact dilation and extraction.” During the procedure, a fetus’s legs and torso are pulled from the uterus before its skull is punctured.

Planned Parenthood has resisted producing the medical records, which critics of the subpoenas say threatens the privacy of patients and could intimidate doctors and clinics that provide abortions.

“We believe it is an invasion of confidential medical records,” Planned Parenthood spokeswoman Elizabeth Toledo said Thursday. “People ought to have a reasonable expectation of privacy.”

Toledo said several hundred records were being sought from Planned Parenthood affiliates that serve western Pennsylvania; San Diego; Los Angeles; New York City; Kansas/Mid-Missouri; and the Washington metro area. The Justice Department is focusing on those to produce a geographic sample and because many of Planned Parenthood’s expert witnesses work at the six sites.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America, founded in 1916 and based in New York, runs 900 health centers in 49 states and serves about 5 million people each year.

The Justice Department also is seeking similar records from six hospitals where doctors who are challenging the partial-birth abortion law did the procedure. The department is encountering resistance over privacy concerns.

The department recently filed a motion seeking to force Planned Parenthood to produce the records in U.S. District Court in San Francisco. The trial is scheduled to begin March 29.

Planned Parenthood and the Justice Department have reached an agreement on how to protect the identities of any records that do become a part of the case. Attorney General John Ashcroft has insisted that the government has no interest in learning the identity of any patient.

The lawsuits claim that the ban on this contested type of abortion is unconstitutional because it is too broad and lacks an exception for a woman’s health.

© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
This is an outrageous and egregious attack on right to privacy and it frightens me to think that it is even being considered. Can't our govenment focus on issues like the out-of-control national debt, failing school systems, the service men and women still fighting and dying overseas, etc.? Instead they're focusing on Janet Jackson's tit and violating privacy rights.

That's my rant for the aftenoon.

seretogis 02-27-2004 03:41 PM

Quote:

Attorney General John Ashcroft has insisted that the government has no interest in learning the identity of any patient.
*blink blink* Don't you trust the government?

tecoyah 02-27-2004 03:47 PM

slippery slope....slippery slope

Lebell 02-27-2004 04:32 PM

Bush I am tolerating...barely...but Ashcroft has got to go.

seretogis 02-27-2004 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tecoyah
slippery slope....slippery slope
Is that the cue for a half dozen liberals to post on this thread berating the "slippery slope fallacy"? :)

Ustwo 02-27-2004 04:40 PM

I don't quite get why liberals get their panties in a bunch about Ascroft for doing his job of law enforcement. He isn't writing his own laws, and everything is still working in the courts. Take the 'abortion' out of the above mess and no one would give a shit about him going after doctors doing illegal operations.

Lebell 02-27-2004 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ustwo
I don't quite get why liberals get their panties in a bunch about Ascroft for doing his job of law enforcement. He isn't writing his own laws, and everything is still working in the courts. Take the 'abortion' out of the above mess and no one would give a shit about him going after doctors doing illegal operations.
A lot of conservatives get their panties in a bunch over Ashcroft as well.

Ustwo 02-27-2004 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lebell
A lot of conservatives get their panties in a bunch over Ashcroft as well.
With Libertarian style conservatives I see that, and I consider myself to be one, but I don't blame the man for doing the job he has. If you don't like it blame the laws, but I'd be more worried about an attorney general who decided which laws he wanted to enforce and which he would ignore.

floydthebarber 02-27-2004 04:57 PM

The man is scary. I'm sure glad you guys got him and not us.

Lebell 02-27-2004 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ustwo
With Libertarian style conservatives I see that, and I consider myself to be one, but I don't blame the man for doing the job he has. If you don't like it blame the laws, but I'd be more worried about an attorney general who decided which laws he wanted to enforce and which he would ignore.
Well, that is a good point and of course, why I don't like Ashcroft.

txlovely 02-27-2004 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ustwo
I don't quite get why liberals get their panties in a bunch about Ascroft for doing his job of law enforcement. He isn't writing his own laws, and everything is still working in the courts. Take the 'abortion' out of the above mess and no one would give a shit about him going after doctors doing illegal operations.
I disagree - my panties aren't in a bunch :p . Doctors need an incredible amount of regulation, some of which must be done by our government for the protection of all Americans. I just don't agree with a violation of doctor/patient privilege.

tecoyah 02-27-2004 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ustwo
With Libertarian style conservatives I see that, and I consider myself to be one, but I don't blame the man for doing the job he has. If you don't like it blame the laws, but I'd be more worried about an attorney general who decided which laws he wanted to enforce and which he would ignore.
Hmmmm...you mean like ignoring the enron dabacle, sorry not ignoring, just not enforcing.

filtherton 02-28-2004 07:12 AM

Well, i guess as long as they aren't attempting to supeona the medical records of one rush limbaugh it is a-okay. Wait, is that a conservative double standard? hmmm.

Ustwo 02-28-2004 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by filtherton
Well, i guess as long as they aren't attempting to supeona the medical records of one rush limbaugh it is a-okay. Wait, is that a conservative double standard? hmmm.
Actually no its not a double standard. While the Justice Department went the legal route to obtain the records, the DA in Florida issued a search warrant and seized them from the doctors offices. This is why they were re-sealed in the Rush case, and this was just one of MANY irregularities on how the DA down there had handled Rush's case.

filtherton 02-28-2004 07:37 AM

Damn, you've seen through my vast oversimplification of the issues!!:o

onetime2 02-29-2004 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by filtherton
Well, i guess as long as they aren't attempting to supeona the medical records of one rush limbaugh it is a-okay. Wait, is that a conservative double standard? hmmm.
First off, all information that would identify the patient would be removed, so it's not anywhere near the same thing. Second, information about procedures (without patient ID's) is already VERY available. This would simply provide information specific to the procedures Planned Parenthood completed.

If these records were seeking the records including the personal information about the patients, I would be completely against it. According to this article that is not the case.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360