ChrisJericho

I am a democrat, yet I am baffled by Kerry's attacks on special interest. I think pretty much everyone these days realizes that ALL politcians, particularly those running expensive presidential races, are heavily funded by special interests.

Do any other democrats believe Kerry should re-think all this attention on special interests?

__________________
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows us that faith proves nothing." - Friedrich Nietzsche

filtherton

I agree. I think it is just part of the issue shell game that most politicians play in an attempt to appeal to the most voters. It just proves that kerry is playing the politics game, rather than showing his true colors. True colors won't get you elected though.

onetime2

He's trying to portray Bush as the "special interest candidate" and himself as a reformer. Not surprising since he (and the rest of the Democratic candidates) haven't found enough to really push people away from voting for Bush. They are simply trying to find issues that will resonate with voters. Unfortunately I don't think this is one of them.

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

Phaenx

Politicians are jack asses, that should solve any question you'll ever have about politics.

__________________
"I went shopping last night at like 1am. The place was empty and this old woman just making polite conversation said to me, 'where is everyone??' I replied, 'In bed, same place you and I should be!' Took me ten minutes to figure out why she gave me a dirty look." --Some guy

Sparhawk

Guess we can shut the forum down now, can't we?

I think he's saying it because it needs to be said. Politicians all have special interests, the ones with guts are those who can say to their special interests "This [whatever] isn't going to happen the way you want to happen." Clinton and the former Bush are decent examples of this, the current Bush is a stunning example of the opposite, and it deserves fair play in the campaign.

__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work."

mml

Kerry and his advisors feel that at this stage of the campaign, when he is trying to appear as the eventual nominee, they should be running against Bush not the other Dems. They also believe that this is an issue which Democratic Primary Voters (a decidedly anti-Bush group) will connect with. It will be interesting to see if this remains a major issue if he does indeed become the nominee. My guess is that he will be addressing issues like job loss and international relations and primarily defending himself from the Bush onslaught (which will be hard-hitting and ferocious).

__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
-Douglas Adams

jcookc6

John Kerry has taken more money from Special Interest Groups then most. It is that he doesnt like Bush's choice of special interest groups.

jcookc6

I know that the people who run this forum don't like to click on links, but if anyone is interested, here is a good web site about money and contributions to political canidates, especially those in the Presidential race: http://www.opensecrets.org/presidential/index.asp
click on it if you wish, if not as I have told, just move on to the next post.

bt8624

yep.....don't worry, kerry will change his opinion soon...always does when it's in his best "interest" to be on the popular bandwagon of the minute.

seretogis

Uhh.. he is? One word: China.

Then again, Dubya is spooning with China as well, so he is just as bad if not worse than Clinton.

__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames

ubertuber

So, we all agree that they all do it... And you can always count on at least one candidate per major campaign to raise the special interest issue... So maybe they are keeping each other honest to some degree? How much worse would the lobbyist influence be if candidates didn't have to count on getting called to task during reelection? Special interests are inevitable in a redistibutive government system (meaning money is contributed into a place that hands it back out in the form of funding or programs). At least with these jokers pretending to buck the system there is some transparency and accountability.

__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam