Sparhawk

Why is it that special counsels had enough time during the Clinton years to query the president about an affair, but counsels during *this* administration can't get a question in edgewise about what Bush knew when.

I submit to you again, which is more worthy of inquiry?


If the roles were reversed, and this was Clinton's war, could you say the same thing with a straight face?


And can we get *SOMETHING* else to discuss in here...

__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work."

onetime2

Well, for one, the special counsel provision was eliminated with bipartisan support. I submit, once again, that one is quite obviously a crime and the other is not. There is a significant difference there.

If the roles were reversed, I absolutely would be supporting Clinton's decision to go into Iraq. My belief in the actions in Afghanistan and Iraq have nothing to do with George Bush. The same can't be said for most opponents to the actions. They seemed to support Clinton's military actions, but when it's Bush, it's a whole different ball game. Perhaps if Clinton, or Bush Sr, or Carter, or Reagan had reacted to the consistent terrorist actions during their administrations, there would be no Iraq invasion and there would be no Bin Laden and 9.11 would just be another day on the calendar.

As far as something new to talk about, I welcome the prospect. Any suggestions?

__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.

matthew330

If there's one thing you can take away from this thread....it is a well established proven fact Bill Clinton is a liar. Liberals and Republicans alike agree on that, just read the thread.

One other thing you can take away from the thread, as much as an obvious f 'up Clinton is, a liberal in the same breath as acknowledging this fact will grasp at every angle to justify his actions that make him a f 'up.

One other thing.....Bush's motives are debatable (only in the sense that you have to be a wacko conspiracy theorist to think that he sent America to war over some sort of personal vendetta or personal oil interest, even in light of the outcome), but liberals continue to seek every angle that would suggest he's hitler reincarnanted.

If this thread proves anything, other than the fact that the new rules for the politcs board don't apply....

Once again, republicans win - democrats lose....

In the words of my friend....DEFEAT THEM.

Would somebody please lock this thread.

Lebell

Off track, beating a dead horse.

Closed.

__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!