Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2003, 01:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
KnifeMissile's Avatar
 
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
RIAA and MPAA seek antitrust exemption!

This article details how the RIAA and MPAA seek permanent immunity from antitrust lawsuits in a new bill called the Enhancing Federal Obscenity Reporting and Copyright Enforcement (EnFORCE) Act of 2003, sponsored by senator Orrin Hatch.

How is this possible? Doesn't this defeat the whole purpose of antitrust laws?
KnifeMissile is offline  
Old 11-28-2003, 01:50 AM   #2 (permalink)
この印篭が目に入らぬか
 
Location: College
For those that don't like to click:

Quote:
MPAA, RIAA seek permanent antitrust exemption
By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
Posted: 26/11/2003 at 01:09 GMT



Just weeks after an antitrust suit was filed against the RIAA by webcasters, the music labels' lobby group, is, along with Hollywood, seeking a permanent exemption from similar litigation. The proposal seeks to extend the exemption to anything covering mechanical copyright: a sweeping extension of the copyright cartel's immunity.

It's buried away in a piece of legislation co-sponsored by Senator Orrin Hatch called the EnFORCE Act, or the Enhancing Federal Obscenity Reporting and Copyright Enforcement Act of 2003. With 12-year old girls being threatened with $150,000 fines, and the computer industry embracing social engineering technologies such as locked music, you would think the last thing that the nation's cultural heritage needs is stricter enforcement by the copyright cartel.

Hatch said the big studios and major record labels need the exemption because of "market realities...The bill authorizes appropriations to ensure that all Department of Justice units that investigate intellectual property crimes have the support of at least one agent specifically trained in the investigation of such crimes," he said last week.

Hatch was a former critic of the RIAA, and advocate of compulsory licensing, who was seduced by the lobbyists, as Joe Menn describes in his book All The Rave [website - our review]. "Online systems provide a cheaper and easier method of self-publishing," Hatch said. He compared the musicians' predicament on major labels to "it's kind of like paying off your mortgage, but the bank still owns the house."

Hatch had discovered this because he had become a songwriter and performer of inspirational Christian music. At a gala awards dinner in March 2001 hosted by the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, Hatch was awarded a "Hero Award" and the diners heard Nashville star Natalie Grant perform one of his songs, "I Am Not Alone".

The flattery certainly proved inspirational to Hatch, whose own view of "market realities" has changed substantially since then.

"Any bill that further increases the RIAA's power over consumers is extremely disconcerting to us," president of the Webcaster Alliance, Ann Gabriel told us today.

With the Democrat Party so heavily reliant on campaign contributions from the pigopolists, the Bill requires a Republican revolt to avoid becoming law. Perhaps citizens should start reminding their Senators of the United States' cultural heritage as eloquently as Mr Gene Mosher did here did here. ョ
The whole file-sharing thing aside, I think that exempting such organizations from antitrust laws sets a horrendous precedent.

People pirate Microsoft software -- will they get immunity next?
lordjeebus is offline  
Old 11-28-2003, 11:52 AM   #3 (permalink)
Huzzah for Welcome Week, Much beer shall I imbibe.
 
Location: UCSB
*Ding* Floor eleven: Panties, Golf shoes, Facism and Crystal wear
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.

Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."
nanofever is offline  
Old 11-28-2003, 12:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: The Hell I Created.
i think it's a great idea. i mean, if the govt. isn't going to look out for the big corporations/interest groups, who is?
Mael is offline  
Old 11-28-2003, 01:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
beauty in the breakdown
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
The thing that bugs me is this assumtion that corporations are guaranteed a profit, and if they dont get it, they can legislate to get one. Nowhere are corporations guaranteed a profit--if what they are doing doesnt work, thats just tough. Deal with it.
__________________
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."
--Plato
sailor is offline  
Old 11-28-2003, 07:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Nobody should have immunity from any law or lawsuit. Liability is a necessary component of Democracy.
MSD is offline  
Old 11-30-2003, 02:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
HarmlessRabbit's Avatar
 
Location: San Jose, CA
Quote:
Originally posted by sailor420
The thing that bugs me is this assumtion that corporations are guaranteed a profit, and if they dont get it, they can legislate to get one. Nowhere are corporations guaranteed a profit--if what they are doing doesnt work, thats just tough. Deal with it.
This is exactly what's wrong with the new Medicare bill. It guarantees the health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies a profit.

It's sad that post-Enron the republicans really haven't stepped up to the plate on corporate responsiblity. For the party that espouse the "free-market", I see precious little of the free market being allowed to work.
HarmlessRabbit is offline  
Old 12-07-2003, 09:56 AM   #8 (permalink)
Tilted
 
These org's are aware that they are in a fight for the lives basicly. so, they're willing to fight tooth and nail for every advantage they can get their hands on. They'll fight, cheat, steal and try to block anything that could weaken their position. if i were them, i'd do the same thing.
Dwarf020 is offline  
Old 12-07-2003, 06:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Dubya
 
Location: VA
Who are the 'pigopolists', and why is the Democratic Party so reliant on them?
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work."
Sparhawk is offline  
 

Tags
antitrust, exemption, mpaa, riaa, seek


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360