Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2010, 06:46 PM   #201 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
Apparently the Supreme Court overturned a ban on direct corporate spending on elections. I should start a thread about it.
don't I feel like the asshole.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 07:06 PM   #202 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Well, a lot of this was quasi-related.

What feedback can you guys give regarding the Fish article Cyn posted?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-23-2010, 09:07 PM   #203 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Up north
The Supremes (not!) got it so wrong.

What they should have done is to say: Corporations are people too ... and every registered corporation that pays taxes can have 1 vote. Enron gets 1 vote, Exxon 1 vote, Microsoft 1 vote, Blackwater 1 vote, Fox News 1 vote ... and obtw as people who vote they are all subject to individual limits on campaign contributions.
HannaH13 is offline  
Old 02-24-2010, 10:49 AM   #204 (permalink)
Lennonite Priest
 
pan6467's Avatar
 
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by HannaH13 View Post
The Supremes (not!) got it so wrong.

What they should have done is to say: Corporations are people too ... and every registered corporation that pays taxes can have 1 vote. Enron gets 1 vote, Exxon 1 vote, Microsoft 1 vote, Blackwater 1 vote, Fox News 1 vote ... and obtw as people who vote they are all subject to individual limits on campaign contributions.
Very wise solution.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
pan6467 is offline  
Old 02-28-2010, 07:06 PM   #205 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by HannaH13 View Post
What they should have done is to say: Corporations are people too ... and every registered corporation that pays taxes can have 1 vote. Enron gets 1 vote, Exxon 1 vote, Microsoft 1 vote, Blackwater 1 vote, Fox News 1 vote ...
Wouldn't this just put more undue political power into the hands of those with more assets? I thought it a better idea to keep things more balanced. Wouldn't this be a move toward a corpocracy? You'd basically create a huge group of entities that would have a high voter turnout (because it'd a part of "doing business") that would most definitely vote based solely on business/corporate interests. They'd be easily wooed, in other words. Not only that, but what would stop people from creating several corporations merely to get more votes (among other benefits)?

I think it's a terrible idea.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 03-23-2010, 05:56 PM   #206 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Corporations still cannot give money directly to federal political campaigns. What they can do is spend as much money as they want on political ads. That's the issue here. And the argument is that this is a right protected by the 1st Amendment. I don't know if there is a simple solution here.
There never was supposed to be a simple solution. That would defeat its purpose.

Quote:
When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.
"The Law"
WinchesterAA is offline  
Old 07-28-2010, 02:34 PM   #207 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Senate fails to pass The Disclose Act

Senate Fails to Pass Disclose Act - Newsweek
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

Tags
ban, corporate, court, direct, elections, overturns, spending, supreme


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73