Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2009, 09:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
GIVE Act Amendment

Well the GIVE act passed the house and senate. Here is an amendment that was tacked on:

Quote:
H.AMDT.49 (A012)
Amends: H.R.1388
Sponsor: Rep Miller, George [CA-7] (offered 3/18/2009)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
Amendment to prohibit organizations from attempting to influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing.

STATUS:

3/18/2009 4:32pm:
Amendment (A012) offered by Mr. Miller, George. (consideration: CR H3607; text: CR H3607)
3/18/2009 4:32pm:
On agreeing to the Miller, George amendment (A012) Agreed to by voice vote.
Is this not a direct assault on the first amendment? CHANGE is coming and it's not for the better.

Sadly, this is only a small fraction of the bill. I haven't had a chance to go through the GIVE act, but it smells like indentured servitude to me.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 10:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
No, it is not a violation of the first amendment. The first amendment guarantees the right of the people to freedom of speech/expression/press, etc. In other words, individual people can still speak out about legislation, petitions, boycotts, etc. Corporations are not people, and should not have constitutional rights.

(edit)

Having now read the definitions, here's my amendment to the amendment discussion:

The bill, as amended, says "If you come to the government and get a handout, you agree to not do this stuff."

That, too, is fine. If your community service organization wants to influence legislation or go unionbusting, then don't ask the government for money.

Last edited by shakran; 03-24-2009 at 10:17 AM..
shakran is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 01:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
I've heard that this 'act' implies some sort of forced service. I'm pretty sure this is inaccurate, right?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 01:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
I've heard that this 'act' implies some sort of forced service. I'm pretty sure this is inaccurate, right?
I havent read the full bill, but as I understand it, it mostly expands the existing National and Community Service Act... including restoring and expanding funding (that was cut in recent years) to support community service and volunteerism.

I think it might have a provision to undertake a "study" on the merits and practicality of mandatory national service...and thats what has some up in arms.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 02:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
I havent read the full bill, but as I understand it, it mostly expands the existing National and Community Service Act... including restoring and expanding funding (that was cut in recent years) to support community service and volunteerism.

I think it might have a provision to undertake a "study" on the merits and practicality of mandatory national service...and thats what has some up in arms.
Thanks, dc. That's what I came here to post. It does have a study provision, which means....nothing.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 02:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
then i guess if that ever becomes serious, i'll worry about it then.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 07:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
True. But I find the notion of a Labor Draft in this country to be dispicable, and the fact that these people are even considering such a thing makes the hairs on the back of my neck rise.
The_Dunedan is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 07:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
samcol's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
then i guess if that ever becomes serious, i'll worry about it then.
Well, as strongly as you are about the 2nd amendment, I think you would realize that what they talk about usually has a way of becoming law. Considering the amendment passed with a unrecorded vote, I would be very concered. Plus this massive bill passed under the fog of the economic crisis with almost no coverage. I don't even think it was possible for members of congress to read it in time to vote.

The 'organizations' in the amendment from what I've been reading refers to the people in these corps. It seems the bill is talking about about 1 in 100 to 1 in 50 people in America being involved in them. So this group wouldn't be allowed to "influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing."

With the economy going the way it is and the mandatting of teaching about these 'corps' groups in schools, it's going to be a very convenient thing for youngsters to join. If not required after the study is completed.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize.
samcol is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 08:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcol View Post

The 'organizations' in the amendment from what I've been reading refers to the people in these corps. It seems the bill is talking about about 1 in 100 to 1 in 50 people in America being involved in them. So this group wouldn't be allowed to "influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing."
No, it doesn't refer to the people in these corps. It refers to the organizations themselves. And would anyone disagree that publicly funded organizations dedicated solely to organizing volunteer efforts should remain apolitical?
dippin is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 03:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcol View Post
Well, as strongly as you are about the 2nd amendment, I think you would realize that what they talk about usually has a way of becoming law. Considering the amendment passed with a unrecorded vote, I would be very concered. Plus this massive bill passed under the fog of the economic crisis with almost no coverage. I don't even think it was possible for members of congress to read it in time to vote.
Over the last 16 years, I've learned to accept that this government has no interest or concern in protecting the rights of American citizens, only it's core group of supporters. Unrecorded votes are those members ways of protecting their collective asses. They can sit on capitol hill and write, vote on, and pass any law they want to. It eventually will not matter. Sooner or later, the people of this country will have had enough.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
 

Tags
act, amendment, give


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:28 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360