Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2008, 02:45 PM   #41 (permalink)
Psycho
 
connyosis's Avatar
 
Location: Sweden - Land of the sodomite damned
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
Am I completely lost? Anyone else, does this somehow make sense?
Nope, not one bit. I really don't get why having different ages for drinking is cool but different ages when it comes to sex is a no no.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke
I am mostly on the predators side because my political opinion is an age of consent on 13 years old. When it is 12 years old, then I am on the police side, mostly.
Dude...you have officially creeped me out...
__________________
If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby.
connyosis is offline  
Old 03-21-2008, 05:11 PM   #42 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous
I personally have never been to jail, but Ive known a few people who have, plus my sister is a prison warden (at Highpoint, a men's prison) - so Im not totally ignorant: and I've never heard of anyone getting raped in jail.

Im sure it happens, but I think it is a bit of a myth that it is so widespread. My uncle spent a lot of time inside, and he said nothing like that ever happened to him.
This is true in the US as well as England. It's mostly a myth to scare people (plus it makes for entertaining TV and movies.)
MSD is offline  
Old 03-27-2008, 11:11 AM   #43 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by connyosis
Nope, not one bit. I really don't get why having different ages for drinking is cool but different ages when it comes to sex is a no no.



Dude...you have officially creeped me out...
This kind of intolerance is very common in Sweden and that is one reason I maybe will move to the Netherlands.
Jocke is offline  
Old 03-27-2008, 11:27 AM   #44 (permalink)
eats puppies and shits rainbows
 
RetroGunslinger's Avatar
 
Location: An Area of Space Occupied by a Population, SC, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Have you met a 15 year old girl? They're a mess.
As a high school guy who knows a lot of girls, I'm gonna have second that one. High school girls, especially freshmen and sophomores, are fucked up to an extreme. They don't know what they want, and they don't have the maturity to know what's best for them.

And Jocke, I do understand where you're coming from, I really do, but 13?! They'd be in the 8th or 9th grade, do you seriously remember girls from that time making smart choices?
__________________
It's a rare pleasure in this world to get your mind fucked. Usually it's just foreplay.

M.B. Keene

Last edited by RetroGunslinger; 03-28-2008 at 01:41 PM.. Reason: grammatical error
RetroGunslinger is offline  
Old 03-28-2008, 01:55 PM   #45 (permalink)
Psycho
 
connyosis's Avatar
 
Location: Sweden - Land of the sodomite damned
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke
This kind of intolerance is very common in Sweden and that is one reason I maybe will move to the Netherlands.
Intolerance? Jesus tittyfuck man! If intolerant means not believing 13 year old should have sex (Because they're fucking 13) then yes, I guess I am intolerant.

Why should they not have sex you say? Well, simply because a 13 year old is pretty much on the same level as a labrador. They only drool less.

But fine, if you want to leave our intolerant prepubescent sex hating country by all means do.
__________________
If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby.
connyosis is offline  
Old 03-29-2008, 06:19 PM   #46 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
The medical community has concluded based on years of observation that during certain stages in development, sexual activity can cause long-term or irreparable psychological harm. Putting the age of consent at 18 establishes a bit of a buffer zone; the majority of people who have reached age 18 are either mature enough to make decisions about their sexual actions, or at least developed enough that they will not suffer psychological harm. There are frequently "Romeo and Juliet laws" that allow for a certain age difference across or below the 18 line because during mid-to-late adolescence, sexual activity with those of approximately the same age is not generally harmful while sex between someone in that age group and someone significantly older is highly likely to be coercive or otherwise harmful.
MSD is offline  
Old 03-29-2008, 11:48 PM   #47 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I guess - the only objective guide that is available in making these laws is the relative maturity, physical and mental, of the young people involved.

Now obviously... people keep maturing past 18. But I'm sure that it would be possible to graph various attributes (sounds like a joke eh, but I'm serious) and found cut-off points, ie where most development is 'complete'.

I mean to say... to me, a 25yr old is immature. But I'm sure that the rate of learning and (cough) development is much slower between 18 and 25, for example, than 11 and 18.

Fact is though.... In many countries the age is probably 18, purely and simply because that is the legal age for everything else.

My personal view? I think 18 is a fair age of consent. However I strongly support these so called 'romeo/juliet' laws. You cannot on one hand say that a child is too young to consent, but old enough to know better (and hence be guilty of a sex crime).
Nimetic is offline  
Old 03-30-2008, 08:07 AM   #48 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
I have problems with that show, if only because they are causing a huge scare about a problem that is very small.

I wish I still had the article I read that showed how few actual incidents of online sexual predator crimes there are year to year. Add in that over 50% of the arrests made are for predators accidentally talking to undercover police online instead of teenagers, and the point grows stronger. I think they said that the # of actual adult-to-teenager predatory arrests is under 500 per year.

The TV show makes you think that tens of thousands of predators are out there every night. WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN????
Derwood is offline  
Old 03-31-2008, 12:16 PM   #49 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
I have problems with that show, if only because they are causing a huge scare about a problem that is very small.

I wish I still had the article I read that showed how few actual incidents of online sexual predator crimes there are year to year. Add in that over 50% of the arrests made are for predators accidentally talking to undercover police online instead of teenagers, and the point grows stronger. I think they said that the # of actual adult-to-teenager predatory arrests is under 500 per year.

The TV show makes you think that tens of thousands of predators are out there every night. WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN????
Yeah and it makes parents think that if their 12-year old daughter chats with a 40-year old who says he wants to have sex with her, she will agree to it.
Jocke is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 11:54 AM   #50 (permalink)
follower of the child's crusade?
 
The age of consent in Netherlands is 16, I am not sure I understand your reason for wanting to move there.

There are many reasons to move to somewhere else, but I have never heard someone give such a reason as you have alluded to.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."

The Gospel of Thomas
Strange Famous is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 05:38 AM   #51 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous
The age of consent in Netherlands is 16, I am not sure I understand your reason for wanting to move there.

There are many reasons to move to somewhere else, but I have never heard someone give such a reason as you have alluded to.
That's true but the attitude towards reformers is totally different.
Jocke is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:18 AM   #52 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
The issue for me in this whole 'age of consent' debate is that very few men over the age of 25 would pursue a relationship with a girl under the age of 18 for anything other than casual sex. They're not looking to marry them or to really date them. I'm not comfortable with young girls being the target of casual sex by grown men. That is the icky part - for me.

Therefore I am much more comfortable with laws based on an age difference, for example, an 18-year-old dating a 15-year-old is much more likely to result in a real relationship than a 40-year-old and a 15-year-old.

And I would be comfortable with a national age of consent at 17.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:31 AM   #53 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
The issue for me in this whole 'age of consent' debate is that very few men over the age of 25 would pursue a relationship with a girl under the age of 18 for anything other than casual sex. They're not looking to marry them or to really date them. I'm not comfortable with young girls being the target of casual sex by grown men. That is the icky part - for me.

Therefore I am much more comfortable with laws based on an age difference, for example, an 18-year-old dating a 15-year-old is much more likely to result in a real relationship than a 40-year-old and a 15-year-old.

And I would be comfortable with a national age of consent at 17.
But it doesn't matter if it doesn't result in a real relationship. Maybe they just want to have sex with eachother and why ban that?
Jocke is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:46 AM   #54 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke
But it doesn't matter if it doesn't result in a real relationship. Maybe they just want to have sex with eachother and why ban that?
I'm not sure why you want so badly to oversimplify this issue. What is simple to know and understand is the part that emotional maturity plays in cultivating a healthy sex life. Maturity and emotional maturity being two different things. I can't say that I've ever known a girl under the age of 17 who has been emotionally ready to handle casual sex and I really see no reason to encourage it.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:18 AM   #55 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke
But it doesn't matter if it doesn't result in a real relationship. Maybe they just want to have sex with eachother and why ban that?
Real relationships is the determining factor here? And just how do you know whether or not it's going to develop into a "real relationship?"

I'm sorry I've read through all your arguments on this matter and they make about as much sense as a mule in a four star restaurant and seemingly just as stubborn.

Bottom line- adults should not be engaging in sexual relations with children, and yes teenagers are children.

I'm getting the feeling from reading your posts you have a thing for really young people, if so seek help before you end up seriously damaging an innocent person.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 08:13 AM   #56 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
Real relationships is the determining factor here? And just how do you know whether or not it's going to develop into a "real relationship?"

I'm sorry I've read through all your arguments on this matter and they make about as much sense as a mule in a four star restaurant and seemingly just as stubborn.

Bottom line- adults should not be engaging in sexual relations with children, and yes teenagers are children.

I'm getting the feeling from reading your posts you have a thing for really young people, if so seek help before you end up seriously damaging an innocent person.
It is your message that doesn't make sense. In the way you are arguing, it seems like you should agree with me. "Real relationships is the determining factor here? And just how do you know whether or not it's going to develop into a "real relationship?"" I agree...
Jocke is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 08:21 AM   #57 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke
It is your message that doesn't make sense. In the way you are arguing, it seems like you should agree with me. "Real relationships is the determining factor here? And just how do you know whether or not it's going to develop into a "real relationship?"" I agree...
I post "Bottom line- adults should not be engaging in sexual relations with children, and yes teenagers are children."

and you post

"In the way you are arguing, it seems like you should agree with me."

And I'm the one not making any sense?

Seek help.

I'm done here.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 09:23 AM   #58 (permalink)
Aurally Fixated
 
allaboutmusic's Avatar
 
I personally think that anyone who feels that sex with a 13-year-old is ok is somewhat lacking in maturity. If that lack of maturity is because they are 15, then that is perhaps excusable, but if they are much older than that, then questions have to be asked; if their PREFERENCE is 13-year-olds, then SERIOUS questions have to be asked. I'd start with why they'd prefer someone that much younger when there are so many prospective partners available who are closer in age.

I teach at an all-girls' high school, and IMO very few of them (including those up to 16-17) have the emotional maturity to be having sex safely - and by safely I don't just mean condoms. I also think that the educational system is afraid of engaging in real discussion with young people about sex beyond biology and prevention of pregnancy and disease, which is possibly contributing to this lack of maturity.

One could argue that this has always been the case to some extent, but exposure to sex is higher than ever these days, and it is happening at a younger age. Children are more exposed and influenced by the media than ever, and of course sex is very much glamourised in the media. I think that overall this does not lead to a balanced and mature view on sex and all its consequences. It also doesn't help that most adults aren't very clued up on sexual matters either (TFP being a somewhat skewed sample).
allaboutmusic is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:27 AM   #59 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Republican Party
If it can't yet vote... don't fuck it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Yeah, I'm lost too. I can't get my ... around it.

__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."
Plan9 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 11:09 AM   #60 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke
But it doesn't matter if it doesn't result in a real relationship. Maybe they just want to have sex with eachother and why ban that?
Quote:
The medical community has concluded based on years of observation that during certain stages in development, sexual activity can cause long-term or irreparable psychological harm. Putting the age of consent at 18 establishes a bit of a buffer zone; the majority of people who have reached age 18 are either mature enough to make decisions about their sexual actions, or at least developed enough that they will not suffer psychological harm. There are frequently "Romeo and Juliet laws" that allow for a certain age difference across or below the 18 line because during mid-to-late adolescence, sexual activity with those of approximately the same age is not generally harmful while sex between someone in that age group and someone significantly older is highly likely to be coercive or otherwise harmful.
MSD is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 12:17 PM   #61 (permalink)
Oh dear God he breeded
 
Seer666's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona
Without taking a stance on this topic, I do just find it interesting that humans are the only creatures out there that, even though nature says they body is ready to go, still declare it off limets. Also, the 18 thing is a rather recent development in human history. Used to be they were married off soon as they started bleeding every month. Could it be this is only an issue because someone desided to make it so and everyone else just went along with it without asking why?
__________________
Bad spellers of the world untie!!!

I am the one you warned me of

I seem to have misplaced the bullet with your name on it, but I have a whole box addressed to occupant.
Seer666 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 12:31 PM   #62 (permalink)
Eponymous
 
jewels's Avatar
 
Location: Central Central Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seer666
Used to be they were married off soon as they started bleeding every month. Could it be this is only an issue because someone desided to make it so and everyone else just went along with it without asking why?
Used to be girls didn't require an education. The USA used to belong to the Indians. Used to be a lot of things.

Evolution, civilization, growth, industrialization and changing times.

Yeah yeah so I have three daughters. Put on a mother's shoes for a moment. Would you feel comfortable with a 40-year old trying to seduce your 15 year old daughter just because she's physically mature? Or maybe it's because she's fresh and unspoiled? :nono:

On the other hand, I do feel our mores are far behind Europe when it comes to the human body. Breastfeeding and nudity are so taboo in this country (a la the Janet Jackson Superbowl fiasco) which is positively ludicrous.

I think kids have so much to contend with and so many images (I've been reading up on Culture Jamming ) to live up to that they don't know who they are until they're much older now. They have access to information but don't really comprehend it all yet.
__________________
We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess.
Mark Twain
jewels is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 12:45 PM   #63 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seer666
Without taking a stance on this topic, I do just find it interesting that humans are the only creatures out there that, even though nature says they body is ready to go, still declare it off limets. Also, the 18 thing is a rather recent development in human history. Used to be they were married off soon as they started bleeding every month. Could it be this is only an issue because someone desided to make it so and everyone else just went along with it without asking why?
We used to die at 45 on average as well.

Our civilization in the west has basically extended childhood, well past 'bleeding time'.

Also this is a case of where whats best for the species need not be what best for the individual. Reproduction early and often was important when childbearing years were so short and death by childbirth so frequent. Now we have women in their 40's having healthy children where they used to be grandmothers at that age.

Likewise it seems many, due to the diets etc, are reaching sexual maturity earlier than they used to.

So I have no problem with 18 being the age of consent.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 12:52 PM   #64 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Is this the proper time to start citing the Old Testament for the way things used to be? Used to be a time when I could buy any of you and sell you as chattel. Used to be a time I could make you build me a pyramid. Used to be a time when I could kill you for crossing yourself with two fingers instead of three and still feel assured of my place in Heaven.

The way things used to be isn't really relavent to today.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:48 AM   #65 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
who the hell would want to have sex with a 15 year old girl? give me a woman who knows what she's doing, thanks
Derwood is offline  
Old 04-21-2008, 08:59 AM   #66 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So I have no problem with 18 being the age of consent.
As the guy who went to medical school, can you confirm or deny that what I posted and keep quoting is a valid statement?
MSD is offline  
Old 04-21-2008, 11:14 AM   #67 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
The medical community has concluded based on years of observation that during certain stages in development, sexual activity can cause long-term or irreparable psychological harm. Putting the age of consent at 18 establishes a bit of a buffer zone; the majority of people who have reached age 18 are either mature enough to make decisions about their sexual actions, or at least developed enough that they will not suffer psychological harm. There are frequently "Romeo and Juliet laws" that allow for a certain age difference across or below the 18 line because during mid-to-late adolescence, sexual activity with those of approximately the same age is not generally harmful while sex between someone in that age group and someone significantly older is highly likely to be coercive or otherwise harmful.
I can't say without qualification that this is true or not. I do agree with it, I do believe it, I think it ties in well with what interests me in the evolution of sex, but I haven't looked at such studies or their validity.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 04-22-2008, 04:53 AM   #68 (permalink)
Psycho
 
connyosis's Avatar
 
Location: Sweden - Land of the sodomite damned
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I can't say without qualification that this is true or not. I do agree with it, I do believe it, I think it ties in well with what interests me in the evolution of sex, but I haven't looked at such studies or their validity.
Wow, I agree with Ustwo. Could someone check if hell has frozen over?

I doubt that two 15 year olds having sex would cause any permanent damage to any of them (And I'm saying this without having anything to back it up, just makes sense to me), but a 30-40 year old having sex with someone that young?

Completely disregarding the yuk-factor (Since I don't see banning something just because I might find it disgusting a good idea), being in your early teens is a sensitive time, and I do think that a lot of kids that age are simply not mature enough realize the long term effects ones decisions might have. I would consider whether to fuck someone your dads age a pretty important decision, but maybe that's just me...
__________________
If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby.
connyosis is offline  
Old 07-04-2008, 05:16 PM   #69 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
I post "Bottom line- adults should not be engaging in sexual relations with children, and yes teenagers are children."

and you post

"In the way you are arguing, it seems like you should agree with me."

And I'm the one not making any sense?

Seek help.

I'm done here.
Why would I seek help? I don't understand this attitude that is like: "Either you want to cut off the genitals of the pedophiles or you are a pedophile yourself."
Jocke is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 03:06 AM   #70 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
I think if MSD wants to continue reposting an official stance from the medical community, he should at least provide some references to peer reviewed journals making such a ludicrous claim.

To Ustwo's credit, at least he said he's never seen such a study or been able to assess its validity...even though he personally believes the claim to be true.


Right on the face of it, there is nothing that indicates the medical community thinks "18" has any special developmental significance. In terms of decision making process centers in the brain, they aren't well developed until 25...so if it were due to physiology then we'd have to change our age limits far beyond what people would consider appropriate. I'm talking about sex, driving, drinking, voting, and etc. to bring current age limit legislation on various life consequence decisions in line with what modern science understands about the human brain and human development (which isn't much, btw).


Jocke, if you are interested in an enlightened position on sex between minors and adults, there is at least one country which doesn't come to mind at the moment that has established a tribunal where partners can come before a magistrate and "show" the nature of their consensual relationship and if successful may proceed with their relationship on a sexual level.


What you will find is that many people are uncomfortable about this subject. But where you will find support for the position that age of consent laws are barbaric and fundamentally unfair would be in modern feminist literature, for one. Nearly all laws assume the young female is the one absent the ability to make choices (and you see that fairly deep cultural belief articulated in many posts against you). Young men are often celebrated by their fathers and friends when they cross the sexual threshhold. That is, unless it's with another male. And despite how "ew'd" people claim to be about the topic, the name of the porn game is to make young actresses and models appear as young as possible. Some of the most popular threads in the sexuality section appear to be pre-pubescent teens or barely legal children ready and willing for sex. The irony is that since it's legal, it's ok for older men (predominantly) to leer and masturbate at these children while insulting you for voicing the non-wrongness of it out loud.

You will also find that not many people would be offended by say a MILF having lesbian sex with a "Barely Legal" or shaving the pubic hair off an asian female made to look like she's 16 (or younger) in a photo shoot. In Japan, it's popular to buy "school girl" panties from vending machines.

So I think you're broaching a difficult and controversial topic and kudos for keeping a level head when people can't maintain their composure in light of the gravity of the subject matter.

In terms to one of your main questions, there are a number of extremely serious offenses that are coming out of these types of offenses. Almost all states now will label these men as sex offenders and make some type of public availability to their names and addresses. Mandatory minimums are being passes in nearly all states currently due to the politization of the topic. Life sentences. Our supreme court just recently put some common sense back into the legal stream of consciousness by rejecting death penalties for sexual crimes against children.

It's definately something that needs to be discussed and thought about.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 04:23 AM   #71 (permalink)
You had me at hello
 
Poppinjay's Avatar
 
Location: DC/Coastal VA
This one time, at band camp...

It's an interesting topic, even if creepy at times. All through my 20's, I was hit on by girls age 13+. Most of the time, my reaction was, "what the hell is wrong with you?" In one case, the 1/2+7 rule applied, so, lucky me.

Regional differences apply. I grew up in the rural south, and there was always a group of girls at my high school dating guys in their 30's (especially if they had a totally rad Camaro). When I lived in Kansas, guys outnumbered women 2-1 in the western part of the state. Out of neccesity, 30 to 40 year old farmers would match up with girls in their late teens. Kansas, by the way, ranks 5th in the nation for age related sex crimes. It's been brushed under the rug until Carla Stoveall became AG.

For the record, I am married to somebody born on the exact same day as me, so I'm not a perv, or at least that kind of perv.
__________________
I think the Apocalypse is happening all around us. We go on eating desserts and watching TV. I know I do. I wish we were more capable of sustained passion and sustained resistance. We should be screaming and what we do is gossip. -Lydia Millet

Last edited by Poppinjay; 07-17-2008 at 04:25 AM..
Poppinjay is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 06:23 AM   #72 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poppinjay
This one time, at band camp...

It's an interesting topic, even if creepy at times. All through my 20's, I was hit on by girls age 13+. Most of the time, my reaction was, "what the hell is wrong with you?" In one case, the 1/2+7 rule applied, so, lucky me.

Regional differences apply. I grew up in the rural south, and there was always a group of girls at my high school dating guys in their 30's (especially if they had a totally rad Camaro). When I lived in Kansas, guys outnumbered women 2-1 in the western part of the state. Out of neccesity, 30 to 40 year old farmers would match up with girls in their late teens. Kansas, by the way, ranks 5th in the nation for age related sex crimes. It's been brushed under the rug until Carla Stoveall became AG.

For the record, I am married to somebody born on the exact same day as me, so I'm not a perv, or at least that kind of perv.
1/2+7 rule?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 06:26 AM   #73 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
1/2+7 rule?
Half your age plus seven is an appropriate partner. If you're 40, you can date a 27 year old (40/2 = 20 + 7 = 27) without it being creepy.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 06:37 AM   #74 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by smooth
I think if MSD wants to continue reposting an official stance from the medical community, he should at least provide some references to peer reviewed journals making such a ludicrous claim.

To Ustwo's credit, at least he said he's never seen such a study or been able to assess its validity...even though he personally believes the claim to be true.


Right on the face of it, there is nothing that indicates the medical community thinks "18" has any special developmental significance. In terms of decision making process centers in the brain, they aren't well developed until 25...so if it were due to physiology then we'd have to change our age limits far beyond what people would consider appropriate. I'm talking about sex, driving, drinking, voting, and etc. to bring current age limit legislation on various life consequence decisions in line with what modern science understands about the human brain and human development (which isn't much, btw).


Jocke, if you are interested in an enlightened position on sex between minors and adults, there is at least one country which doesn't come to mind at the moment that has established a tribunal where partners can come before a magistrate and "show" the nature of their consensual relationship and if successful may proceed with their relationship on a sexual level.


What you will find is that many people are uncomfortable about this subject. But where you will find support for the position that age of consent laws are barbaric and fundamentally unfair would be in modern feminist literature, for one. Nearly all laws assume the young female is the one absent the ability to make choices (and you see that fairly deep cultural belief articulated in many posts against you). Young men are often celebrated by their fathers and friends when they cross the sexual threshhold. That is, unless it's with another male. And despite how "ew'd" people claim to be about the topic, the name of the porn game is to make young actresses and models appear as young as possible. Some of the most popular threads in the sexuality section appear to be pre-pubescent teens or barely legal children ready and willing for sex. The irony is that since it's legal, it's ok for older men (predominantly) to leer and masturbate at these children while insulting you for voicing the non-wrongness of it out loud.

You will also find that not many people would be offended by say a MILF having lesbian sex with a "Barely Legal" or shaving the pubic hair off an asian female made to look like she's 16 (or younger) in a photo shoot. In Japan, it's popular to buy "school girl" panties from vending machines.

So I think you're broaching a difficult and controversial topic and kudos for keeping a level head when people can't maintain their composure in light of the gravity of the subject matter.

In terms to one of your main questions, there are a number of extremely serious offenses that are coming out of these types of offenses. Almost all states now will label these men as sex offenders and make some type of public availability to their names and addresses. Mandatory minimums are being passes in nearly all states currently due to the politization of the topic. Life sentences. Our supreme court just recently put some common sense back into the legal stream of consciousness by rejecting death penalties for sexual crimes against children.

It's definately something that needs to be discussed and thought about.
You said what was in my mind better than I could, so I'll just quote you and say, "nice post."
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 06:38 AM   #75 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Never heard of it. So, it's not a legal thing, just a social norm?

Personally (I'm 45) if some one in their twenties shows interest it kind of creeps me out. Part of that could be having a duaghter in her 20's and some of that could be working with sex offenders in a group setting (every Thursday night for 5 years or so, I took a transfer mainly/partly(?) due to this.)

So I guess I'd be good if she was 29 1/2, but I really would rather she be 35+
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 01:05 PM   #76 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
They need to bring that show back but fill it with female middle school teachers who think they're going to a house to bang one of their students
Derwood is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 01:24 PM   #77 (permalink)
Living in a Warmer Insanity
 
Tully Mars's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
They need to bring that show back but fill it with female middle school teachers who think they're going to a house to bang one of their students

Am I the only one that thinks it's fucked up that the MS teacher in Fl only basically only got probation? Think it was five years probation and some house arrest. Granted she was hot and I'd have done her in MS too. But if some "hot" male teacher got caught banging his female student he'd be grabbing his ankles in the prison shower for the next 10-15 years.
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo

Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
Tully Mars is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 12:21 AM   #78 (permalink)
Upright
 
angelpain's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere between
I tried to read as far as i could of this disturbing thread. The whole time shaking my head. I'm a Paralegal and i'm back in school studying criminal justice and in one of my crim classes we has spent out of the 3 hours of this class on the subject of that crapass show and the website that participates in the stings to lure these schmucks to the house. I think that anyone foolish enough to unzip their pants and take a 13 year old is a dumbass. I detest shows like that that they to open the eyes so small minded fools into believing that this type of crime is the norm. Unfortunately, this type of crime get more publicize because The State needs to make an example of one loser to scare the future pedophiles from committing this type of crime. It's the reason why Magan's Law has become a tool to punish pedophiles ( for those that need to reference Megan's Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )

And I don't mean to single you out Jocke but it's single minded people like yourself that neglect to realize that in this world to let a 13 left to decide for themselves whether they should spread their legs or bend over and let someone take them. Immoral for someone older that know right from wrong knows what they are doing is illegal and could get caught. For that person to wear the scarlet letter of being forever known as a pedophile and unfortunately the cost one pays for committing such a haneness crime. And it is punishable in every country, state etc. it does matter where you live this crime is global. example here are a few sites

Child abuse - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cesdip.org/IMG/pdf/PI_03_1996.pdf

I, personal don't believe that a 12 or 13 can truly understand that having sex comes with a lot of baggage that a child that age can't handle . What i mean by this. Most children that are sexual active right now are out in the world looking for someone that will love them because they're not getting that type of feeling at home from their parents. NO 13 OLD YEAR IS ready to make such adult decisions. I repeat no CHILD should be making babies while they're themselves have to ask their parents to drive them places or begging for money because no one hires a 13. I had recently caught myself watching to episodes of the Maury show( and I know not the best example) . the show as I see it, is hilarious but also tragic because first eppie I watched was about wild teen girls and the first thought that came to mind were all these girls were having unprotected sex half of them could care less if they end up pregnant or with an STD or even H.I.V. And thats the one thing no one here mentioned. Which I find funny. When we were all young just dreamers with this mind set that the world is ours for the conquering could all disappear into thin air. The other message I got from seeing those young girls act that way was for attention. Especially the one girl that was 14 wants to have a baby thinking that baby will instantly love her. How sad? Can I ask for those who are parents isn't the most important thing for your children being happy health and some what blind to reality and just focus on their school work, friends and what college or career they want when they reach high school. Not about whether to change a diaper or having to be the main provider because the "father" denies paternity test to prove it. As much as we all poke fun at the women the end up on the show for the millionth time just wanting their child to know that he/she has both parents in the world.
as porky pig would say thaaaattttt'ssssss alllll folks!!!

p.s if no one has picked it up i had for a year researched and studied abuse
angelpain is offline  
Old 07-26-2008, 11:20 AM   #79 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by smooth View Post
I think if MSD wants to continue reposting an official stance from the medical community, he should at least provide some references to peer reviewed journals making such a ludicrous claim.
I don't have one solid source for that. I'm basically reiterating what a psychiatrist said when this discussion happened elsewhere. If you want sources, I'll dig up some published studies and articles from respectable sources when I have time during the next few days.
MSD is offline  
 

Tags
catch, predator, punishments


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:59 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360