Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   If they are going to do it, we will too. (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/131840-if-they-going-do-we-will-too.html)

ASU2003 02-19-2008 08:21 PM

If they are going to do it, we will too.
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7248995.stm

It didn't take me that long to figure out why the US would shoot down a satellite that would be unlikely to cause any damage. We have shot stuff down before, but not in 23 years. However if you remember a year ago, China shot down one of their satellites in a test.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011801029.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6289519.stm

pan6467 02-19-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASU2003
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7248995.stm

It didn't take me that long to figure out why the US would shoot down a satellite that would be unlikely to cause any damage. We have shot stuff down before, but not in 23 years. However if you remember a year ago, China shot down one of their satellites in a test.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011801029.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6289519.stm

I think it could be both ways.

Let's look at a hypothetical paranoidal situation:

We send up a spysat carrying a massive amount of Hydrazine. Now let's say in the near future we felt threatened by Iran/China etc. We announced a while ago that it was out of control, so if it fell into orbit and "accidentally" fell on the country we were having a problem with and released the gas.... we weren't at fault it was uncontrolled. (Meanwhile, all along "they" (the US intelligence) did have control of it but the country and everyone around the world buys into the accident except the "nutty conspiracy theorists" who no one listens to.

But now, perhaps it truly is uncontrollable and "they" don't want to run the risk of it landing here or in a friendly zone. So why not shoot it dwn and kill 2 birds with one stone.

Or the shoot down could be a ploy and "oops we missed.... sorry Iran/China/etc.).

Is any of it:

Paranoid? Yes.

Probable? Absolutely not.

Possible? Absolutely YES.

sprocket 02-19-2008 09:52 PM

This wired article has some more insight on this who issue:

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/0...rationale.html

Quote:

....

My real concern is that this is simply a knee-jerk reaction made by the Administration in response to the purported threat by the Chinese. Since the April 2007 ASAT [anti-satellite] test, there have been rumors and whispers going around that the Administration and like-minded individuals are looking for more sticks (instead of carrots) to use against China. While this "shoot down" is not a direct action against China, it would be a clear signal that the US can possess an active ASAT capability at any time if it so desires. That is a serious development as the previous US ASAT system using F-15s was mothballed in the 1980's.

There are many significant political ramifications that would happen as a result of this. The US has been berating the Chinese on their ASAT test but now demonstrate that it is okay as long as it occurs at a low enough altitude to prevent long-lasting debris and can "save lives". This is close to an implied "ok" for the US and other nations to conduct more ASAT tests, which could open another arms race. I am also certain that Russian and China would also see this as a slap in the face as they are trying to revive the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space treaty discussion and ban on space weapons. It would further negatively affect the relations between them and the US. Which could lead to increased tensions, arms buildup, etc etc etc. Nothing good for anyone outside of arms manufacturers and politicians that need a bogeyman to scare people into voting for them.

...
I honestly dont have expertise to comment either way, but its interesting food for thought.

Cynthetiq 02-19-2008 10:03 PM

If this is any discussion thread, and especially a politics thread, you should know better than to just dangle a link and no basis for starting a discussion. Rework the OP and then contact a staff member to reopen the thread.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360