02-14-2005, 07:41 AM | #1 (permalink) |
"I'm sorry. What was the question?"
Location: Paradise Regained
|
The Grammy's
Anyone watch last night? What did you think of the performances? I thought Alicia Keys was good. Who was it that sang "Free Bird" with Gretchen Wilson. They were horrible.
The J.Lo/Marc Anthony song was el lame-oh. I quit watching after Etheridge and Stone covered Joplin. Etheridge was okay. I assume she's lost her hair due to chemo??? Any thoughts?
__________________
I have faith in a few things - divinity and grace But even when I'm on my knees I know the devil preys |
02-14-2005, 08:42 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Custom User Title
|
I thought the Melissa Etheridge/Joss Stone tribute to Janis Joplin was exceptional. Melissa is battling breast cancer. Her performance was incredible.
Free Bird was performed by Lynard Skynard - or whatever is left of that group along w/ Keith Urban and Dickie Betts. Its thought to get so many together to play in unison. Which is why I though the group effort on All Across the Universe sucked. Was to raise funds for tsunami relief. Didn't come off so well. |
02-14-2005, 10:48 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
All due respect to Ray Charles, but it seems pretty likely that his wins last night were really tributes to an exceptional career. I haven't heard the album, but was it really the best of the year?
__________________
A little silliness now and then is cherished by the wisest men. -- Willy Wonka |
02-14-2005, 12:50 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Insane
|
I watched the Grammys on-and-off, between Desperate Housewives commercials, but I was fortunate to catch Kanye West's performance, it was amazing.
I sort of have to agree with the Ray Charles thing. I have not listened to his album (nor most of the other nominated albums), but it seems that whenever an artist dies, their music becomes, for lack of a better word, a tad "overrated." In not saying that he didn't deserve it, but I can't help thinking that his passing away played a major role in the voters' mind when it came time to vote. |
02-14-2005, 01:01 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Illinois
|
I agree with the statement about Kanye's performance being outstanding... and that that the J-lo/Marc Anthony thing being weak. I appreciate them trying to celebrate the hispanic culture by singing in spanish, but it lost appeal for me. I appreciate that Ray won last night, but I must admit that I don't agree that it was the best choice. That album was not even close to being the best out there.
|
02-14-2005, 01:18 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
Liked the effort put on by the Lynyrd Skynyrd bit. Except that i didn't know half the guest singers. Good to see the old time guitar work, and that old Elvin Bishop tune. wow.
have to agree that I gagged on the j-lo tune. so lame. Across the universe was also poorly done. Couldn't they get paul or ringo to show up ??? On the whole, an average show (nothing as poignant as Prince and Beyonce....) with a very passable hosting by Queennie. I'm glad rock had a high profile for once. wasn;t familiar with Kanye West. thought he was an old The Apprentice contestant... |
02-14-2005, 01:55 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Copacetic
Location: Nati
|
The Ray Charles tributes were great, Alicia Keys has an incredible voice, The Killers should have won, Tim McGraw sounded TERRIBLE, Across the Universe was completely raped, and I would not have been the least bit upset if a stage light or something had fallen on Maroon 5 and the world could possibly return to listening to at least halfway decent music.
|
02-14-2005, 02:00 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: inside my own mind
|
overall I felt disappointed for most of the reasons that were listed above. I stopped watching in the middle of Across the Universe...then I queued up Let it Be in my stereo...yeah the grammy version sucked...
__________________
A damn dirty hippie without the dirty part.... |
02-14-2005, 04:03 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Los Angeles
|
I didn't mean to catch the show as I have little respect for the Grammys, but I was flipping through on our new flatscreen plasma TV, so I was hypnotized by how nice the picture was for the awards show. I was pleasantly surprised as their were great performances by Kanye West/John Legend/etc, Usher/James Brown and John Mayer.
But, as always, I think the actual awards given out at the Grammys are a joke.
__________________
To be great is to be misunderstood. -Emerson |
02-14-2005, 05:05 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Insane
|
Alicia Keys - Absolutely amazing. The highlight of the show.
Janis Joplin tribute- Excellent. I like Joss Stone, but not Melissa Etheridge. Despite my feelings, she did a great job. Her bald head creeped me out though. Franz Ferdinand- Delightful surprise in the midst of a horrible mix of groups. Across the Universe extravaganza- Despicable. They ruined a wonderful song with missed lyrics, off-key singing and desperate attempts to outdo one another. And I love Velvet Revolver, but what was with Weiland's David Bowie impersonation? Southern Rock tribute- Horrible waste of time. J-Lo/Marc Anthony duet- See Southern Rock comments. Kanye West- Good performance. Loved the Blind Boys of Alabama. Queen Latifah- She can really sing. Did a great jazz standard. Usher/James Brown- The Godfather showed the youngster why he got his nickname. Can't really remember anything else, but one thing really pissed me off. WHY GIVE LED ZEPPELIN A LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD IF THEY DON'T EVEN GET A CHANCE TO GIVE A SPEECH?!?!?!?! |
02-15-2005, 07:29 AM | #17 (permalink) |
All Possibility, Made Of Custard
Location: New York, NY
|
Melissa Etheridge rocked the house. For her to get on stage, while still undergoing chemo, and to not only show women around the world that it's okay to be bald from chemotherapy but to rock the fucking shit out of that song...just unbelievable. She sang the shit out of it.
It's no surprise that Ray Charles won. The album is good but nowhere near his best. But the Grammy Awards are much more about legacy than anything else.
__________________
You have to laugh at yourself...because you'd cry your eyes out if you didn't. - Emily Saliers |
02-15-2005, 09:07 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Junk
|
Quote:
"We never, ever had a Grammy for anything," Page said during an interview on the red carpet, "and that's all right. Maybe we're not Grammy material." Ha ha. Leave it to Jimmy to sum up for a lot of people what exactly the Grammy's are not, at least in part,....awarding musical excellence.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard. |
|
02-15-2005, 09:21 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
Lots of missed opportunities at the Grammies: could've had paul & ringo for across the Universe, should've had an acceptance, performance from the remaining Led Zeppelin members. disagree on the comments on the southern rock tho, it was refreshing to see/hear the classic guitar work. too bad it was mashed into a string of 'southern' hits, instead of some solid Skynyrd. In this time of too much dance/hip hop, it was good to hear rock. |
|
02-19-2005, 05:31 AM | #21 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Ottawa...the greatest city in Canada...down the road from silentjay!
|
How could they not give Zeppelin any airtime and still give them a lifetime achievement award. They have to plug Kanye West...never mind THE BEST SELLING BAND OF ALL TIME!!!!! They can't be relevant huh?!? Fuck the Grammy's! Fuck them in their ass! That pissed me off so much that I am boycotting the Grammy's for eternity. Never has there been such an injustice in the music business.
__________________
i may or may not be on acid right now.... |
02-19-2005, 07:49 AM | #22 (permalink) | |
Insane
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
grammy |
|
|