|
View Poll Results: Beatles: Yay or Nay? | |||
Best rock band ever. Period. | 51 | 40.16% | |
Decent rock band | 50 | 39.37% | |
More related to pop culture than music | 29 | 22.83% | |
Ptitful little boy band | 12 | 9.45% | |
Who? | 3 | 2.36% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
09-14-2004, 09:04 AM | #1 (permalink) |
pinche vato
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
|
Beatles: Yay or Nay? (you may vote for more than one item)
I get itchy when too much time passes without a Beatles thread, so here's another. Basically, were they worth a damn or not?
I promise not to hold it against anybody, really I do.... Please note that Multiple Choice is enabled in the poll.
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed. Last edited by warrrreagl; 09-14-2004 at 11:34 AM.. |
09-14-2004, 09:12 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Is In Love
Location: I'm workin' on it
|
I don't know how to vote in this poll. I can't stand the "best" lable. Who out there can say who else is "best" at something like music. It's so subjective.
That being said, I love the Beatles. I'm not a die hard fan, I have the #1's album and that's it. But I enjoy them. Though I do like early Beatles better than trippy Sgt. Pepper Beatles
__________________
Absence is to love what wind is to fire. It extinguishes the small, it enkindles the great. |
09-14-2004, 09:18 AM | #3 (permalink) |
All hail the Mountain King
Location: Black Mesa
|
I voted "best ever" just because I could not bear to vote for "decent rock band."
Def Leppard is a "decent rock band," the Beatles are so much more and yet I still hesistate to say "best." Anyway, for anyone who missed it, there is an awesome flash animation from a previous Beatles thread here: http://www.milkandcookies.com/links/16037/
__________________
The Truth: Johnny Cash could have kicked Bruce Lee's ass if he wanted to. #3 in a series |
09-14-2004, 09:57 AM | #5 (permalink) |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Damn, warrrreagl...ya got me pinned here without a choice. I wouldn't say that they're the best band ever, but they're certainly a helluva lot better than just "decent". I feel disenfranchised.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
09-14-2004, 10:02 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
pinche vato
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
|
Quote:
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed. |
|
09-14-2004, 10:48 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Take my hand
Location: Everywhere, but nowhere
|
I voted for best ever. Without a doubt the most imaginative group there has ever been. No one has been able to match the songwriting talent of Lennon and McCartney. I have all their albums, and I never grow tired of listening to them.
BTW: I know just how you feel warrrreagl, I get anxious when there are no new Fab 4 threads too.
__________________
The only thing I'll ever ask of you... you gotta promise not to stop when I say when. |
09-14-2004, 10:59 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Walking is Still Honest
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I voted decent, because although I consider them a great band, I don't consider them to be anywhere near the #1 spot. As many others, apparently, I'm between those two choices.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome. |
09-14-2004, 11:24 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Talk nerdy to me
Location: Flint, MI
|
Best rock band ever. Period.
I've always been of the mindset that there are two schools of music, before the Beatles and after. In my opinion, The Beatles changed everything. Whether or not bands admitted it (and alot of them have) they were effected by them, if not influenced by them. The fab 4 broke a lot of doors down and changed the way music is seen, heard and played. The problem with the current music scene is that it is stale. We need another Beatles, but we will probably never get our wish. Entertainment Weekly ran an article that simply asked if The Beatles were still relevant after 40 years. The reporter basically answered the question himself by pointing the fact that we are still talking about them 40 years later, so they must be relevant. I agree. I just can't sse any of today's bands being much more than a footnote in 40 years.
__________________
I reject your reality, and substitute my own -- Adam Savage |
09-14-2004, 11:50 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: Born in hell, but now I have a nice little condo in purgatory
|
That's a hell of an adjective jump from "best, period." to "decent". What happened to "good", "influential", or "fucking superior, but not quite the match of some other behemoths of rock history?" Because that final option definately would have gotten my vote instead of 'decent', but 'best' would just be a lie.
|
09-14-2004, 07:05 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Fuckin' A
Location: Lex Vegas
|
I like the Beatles just fine, but many people make them out to be more important to their art than they really are. Sort of like Jimi Hendrix or Beethoven or Shakespeare or DaVinci. None of them had done anything extremely important or innovative to their school of art, except be popular. If you want me to elaborate on that, PM me, and I'll be happy to. The Beatles were more innovative and important in pop culture than they were in music.
|
09-14-2004, 07:08 PM | #16 (permalink) | |
Psycho
Location: happy place
|
Quote:
__________________
"You can't shake hands with a clenched fist." Ghandi "Things do not change: We change" Henry David Thoreau |
|
09-14-2004, 07:11 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
Insane
|
Quote:
Yes. None of them did anything extremely important or innovative...except for completely revolutionizing the damn thing. What the hell are you talking about? Every one of them made amazing innovations that changed the shape of *their art* (Well, Hendrix doesn't belong up there, the Beatles would be much more fitting.) Do you actually know anything about their accomplishments? Last edited by braindamage351; 09-14-2004 at 07:12 PM.. Reason: Said music by accident |
|
09-14-2004, 08:17 PM | #18 (permalink) |
The Funeral of Hearts
Location: Trapped inside my mind. . .
|
Well, I'll be the first to post negative. I voted 'Pitiful Little Boy Band' simply because I hate the Beatles. I personally see the Beatles as an overrated band, but thats just my opinion, as much in the minority as I may be, thats ok.
Until we meet again. . .
__________________
"So Keep on Pretending. Our Heavens Worth the Waiting. Keep on Pretending. It's Alright." -- H.I.M., "Pretending" |
09-14-2004, 08:38 PM | #19 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Illinois
|
I would definitely say they're better than decent, and I'd even say they're probably the best band, but for some reason I don't associate the label rock with them. I guess I just think of rock as a different type of music... but they are awesome.
|
09-14-2004, 08:56 PM | #20 (permalink) |
shit faced cockmaster
Location: CT
|
i guess some people are funny about the word "best" but to me most influential and experimental and ground breaking would make them pretty damn good.
__________________
"To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems." |
09-15-2004, 05:51 AM | #23 (permalink) | |
All Possibility, Made Of Custard
Location: New York, NY
|
Quote:
I can't vote in this poll because there's too much distance between "the best" and "decent." They're excellent, for both musical and pop culture reasons, but I don't know if I could label anybody "the best."
__________________
You have to laugh at yourself...because you'd cry your eyes out if you didn't. - Emily Saliers |
|
09-15-2004, 07:19 AM | #24 (permalink) | |
Talk nerdy to me
Location: Flint, MI
|
Quote:
I'll amend my original comment above by adding George Martin and Brian Epstein and others to the mix, you expand the overall picture. Were John, Paul, George and Ringo the "Greatest Band Ever"? NO Did the Beatles as a whole (including George and Brian) change music and art forever? YES (IMHO) I think "The Beatles" as a group get credit many things that happened around them. George and Brian were responsible for a lot of things as well as even other people within the circle. For example Astrid Kirchherr, Klaus Voorman, Stuart Sutcliffe, the Maharishi, Ed Sullivan and even Yoko all contibuted to the whole phenomenon. I think in cases like this "The Beatles" refers to the whole experience. But then again, maybe I'm reading way too much into it and over-analyzing a simple question...I tend to do that.
__________________
I reject your reality, and substitute my own -- Adam Savage Last edited by God of Thunder; 09-15-2004 at 07:21 AM.. |
|
09-15-2004, 08:14 AM | #25 (permalink) |
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
|
the beatles....a good band that i am really tired of.
they were really innovative in the george martin arrangments, which exploited possibilities in production that were avilable but had not really been exploited yet--and i like quite alot how they used tape manipulation techniques like looping/delay in a pop format. they were the objects of a new kind of publicity. i like their films. i dont think they revolutionized anything--but there were a part of one in pop recording. i dont think they were great musicians--if you only think about rocknroll, you might see them that way, but if you think about what was happening in jazz etc., then things fit into a different perspective. i do like revolver.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear it make you sick. -kamau brathwaite |
09-16-2004, 06:07 PM | #26 (permalink) |
Registered User
Location: Texas
|
nay for me. i know they were influential and everything, but their music sounds hollow to me. it could be that it was made at a time that didn't have the technology we have now to mix and round out things, but their music was empty for me.
|
09-16-2004, 10:18 PM | #27 (permalink) |
And we'll all float on ok...
Location: Iowa City
|
They're doing well in the poll. What I like so much about them is the variety of their sound. So many songs sound so different, especially if you compare them to shitty bands like Nickleback, whose songs all sound way too similar.
__________________
For those who believe in God, most of the big questions are answered. But for those of us who can't readily accept the God formula, the big answers don't remain stone-written. We adjust to new conditions and discoveries. We are pliable. Love need not be a command or faith a dictum. I am my own God. We are here to unlearn the teachings of the church, state, and our educational system. We are here to drink beer. We are here to kill war. We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us. --Charles Bukowski |
09-23-2004, 08:00 PM | #30 (permalink) |
Upright
Location: the double L
|
It's difficult to say "best ever," but that's what I ultimately have to go with. Any time anyone asks me what my favorite band is, I make sure to qualify that by making sure that they understand that it's unfair to put the Beatles in the running. They were far and away above what anyone else was doing. Everything in rock music happens before or after them. Their musical talent is questionable, (even though Harrison was an amazing guitarist) but it's not about thier raw talent; it's about what they did for rock, for music in general, and for our culture.
|
09-24-2004, 07:46 AM | #31 (permalink) |
Banned from being Banned
Location: Donkey
|
IMO, there is a point where the Beatles seriously sucked... and that was when they first made it big.
They changed the face of music, yes, but *NOT* with their ultra-cheesy songs like "I wanna hold your hand" and "Love me do". I honestly don't think a single (good) artist was inspired by THAT particular phase. It was their later, more experimental, stuff that did the trick Once they grew out of the corny boy-band-like phase, they were actually pretty good.
__________________
I love lamp. |
09-25-2004, 05:25 PM | #35 (permalink) |
Drifting
Administrator
Location: Windy City
|
The history of their evolvement, and the influence they have had other artists since their time, whether the artists are aware of it or not, is something that few bands have so sucessfully accomplished. Part style setter, part pop culture establishment, experimenting with new sounds, and most of all growing as a group is what I think makes them stand out so much. In all of life is there rarely anything that is excellent from the get go. The group started out playing what the crowds wanted to hear, and once they were established then went about making music and writing lyrics for the sake of music. Plus I'd give just about anything to be able to have a Steinway at my disposal.
__________________
Calling from deep in the heart, from where the eyes can't see and the ears can't hear, from where the mountain trails end and only love can go... ~~~ Three Rivers Hare Krishna |
09-26-2004, 08:45 AM | #37 (permalink) |
Femme Fatale
Location: Elysium
|
Best rock band ever? wasn't Beatles more of a pop band than a rock band...?
anyhow The Beatles is pretty damn decent but not the best band in the world IMO
__________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip. |
10-08-2004, 11:14 AM | #39 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: This is not my beautiful house
|
Quote:
I have great memories of being a kid and listening to the Abbey Road album on my parent's boat. To this day, it's probably my favorite Beatles album (especially the B-side), and maybe my second favorite album of all time.
__________________
If it weren't for my horse, I never would've spent that year in college. |
|
10-08-2004, 04:42 PM | #40 (permalink) |
Upright
|
the beatles started out pretty well, but it wasnt until after the beatlemania era that they started making really good music that was deep and philosophical. songs like "lucy in the sky with diamonds" and"strawberry fields forever" and those were really cool.
|
Tags |
beatles, nay, yay |
|
|