Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Motors


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2009, 03:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Warrior Smith
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Location: missouri
buying a used car- which to choose

So the wife and I are currently looking at two possible used vehicles, a 2004 chevy malibu and a 1998 subaru legacy wagon (brighton) both have less than 80 k miles on them, and are in supposedly good shape.... anyone got experience on either?
__________________
Thought the harder, Heart the bolder,
Mood the more as our might lessens
Fire is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 03:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
I couldn't tell you about the malibu, but properly maintained Subarus hit 300,000 mi every day. Also, AWD ftw! (I <3 my Impreza)

//something else:

I just thought of this, if your the type who likes to do routine maintenance yourself, the Subarus (at least mine) tend to be much more user friendly than other brands. My mechanic (trusted family friend) strongly agrees. I don't even have to touch a jack to change the oil.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.

Last edited by Hektore; 06-21-2009 at 03:48 PM..
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 04:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Ilow's Avatar
 
Location: Pats country
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
So the wife and I are currently looking at two possible used vehicles, a 2004 chevy malibu and a 1998 subaru legacy wagon (brighton) both have less than 80 k miles on them, and are in supposedly good shape.... anyone got experience on either?
Agree about the Subaru being reliable. If it has the 2.2 liter engine you should be good. I wouldn't buy it with the 2.5 liter as that year has bad head gasket problems (I don't think the Brightons have the 2.5s anyway, as they are the low end model.) AWD is awesome, loved my Impreza and my WRX!
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about"
--Sam Harris
Ilow is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 07:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
If it were my choice, I'd take the Subaru. I don't like Malibus very much. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with them, depending on engine/trim level, but with all things being equal I like the Subaru better.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 06:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Wrexify's Avatar
 
Location: Kramerica
Another vote for Subaru here. I seem to notice a trend...

But yes, it's very likely you'll see that older Subaru go much farther than the newer Malibu with the same regular maintenance. More utility too, assuming the Malibu isn't a wagon and doesn't have AWD.
__________________
"Nitwit! Oddment! Blubber! Tweak!"
Wrexify is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 07:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
It isn't that I am a Subaru fanboy or anything like that. I genuinely don't have any experience with the Malibu, so I can't speak to it's strengths or weaknesses. It may be a great car or it may not be. The Subaru, which I do have experience with, most likely will be a great car.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 07:27 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
Jusst like to make a point that the Malibu is 6 years newer than the Subaru. That's gotta factor into the situation somehow...
__________________
You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey
And I never saw someone say that before
You held my hand and we walked home the long way
You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr


http://dune.wikia.com/wiki/Leto_Atreides_I
Leto is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 09:20 AM   #8 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Subaru all the way. They're fugly and utilitarian and run forever.
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."
Plan9 is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 09:33 AM   #9 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto View Post
Jusst like to make a point that the Malibu is 6 years newer than the Subaru. That's gotta factor into the situation somehow...
If they are the same mileage, I don't see how it would, other than the Subaru has held its value better, if they're the same price.

+1 for the Subaru
__________________
twisted no more
telekinetic is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 09:40 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
wouldn't materials (rubber, plastics etc) just be more aged, regardless of the mileage? I'm not trying to rain on Subaru's parade, it's just that all things being equal, I would go for the new vehicle. I'm not partial to either.
__________________
You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey
And I never saw someone say that before
You held my hand and we walked home the long way
You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr


http://dune.wikia.com/wiki/Leto_Atreides_I
Leto is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 10:29 AM   #11 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
My mother had a Legacy Outback from that era, and it was so good that after 10 years she got a new one.

I find them comfortable, reliable, good running and relatively efficient users of fuel, provided you stay out of "SPORT" mode.

When you want to drive like a nutter, they perform.
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 10:41 AM   #12 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Wrexify's Avatar
 
Location: Kramerica
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto View Post
wouldn't materials (rubber, plastics etc) just be more aged, regardless of the mileage? I'm not trying to rain on Subaru's parade, it's just that all things being equal, I would go for the new vehicle. I'm not partial to either.
Well that's true, I'm sure the interior and other features are nicer on the newer Malibu. There's no guarantee that either one will last longer, but Subaru's reputation suggests that you'll get an excellent reliable vehicle. It probably just won't have as many bells and whistles on the inside.
__________________
"Nitwit! Oddment! Blubber! Tweak!"
Wrexify is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 03:55 PM   #13 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
I can't vouch for the Subaru being reliable, not when my 98 Impreza spun a bearing for no apparent reason. This problem is more common than people believe with both 2.2 and 2.5L motors.

And no, I didn't run out of oil, nor did I neglect to do my regular 3,000 mi oil change.
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 05:44 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuasiMondo View Post
I can't vouch for the Subaru being reliable, not when my 98 Impreza spun a bearing for no apparent reason. This problem is more common than people believe with both 2.2 and 2.5L motors.

And no, I didn't run out of oil, nor did I neglect to do my regular 3,000 mi oil change.
Now, I don't know a lot about cars, but I do know some things. Is it possible that this is related to a timing chain failure of some kind, because that is the only major problem I've heard about with Subaru. When the chain goes they need to be caught quickly or it will wreak havoc in short order.

Or you could just do what everyone has suggested to me - get the chain changed every 80k-100k miles. So for Fire: If you don't know when the chain was last changed, get it done just to be sure, the risk/reward for letting it go just isn't there.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 08:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
Addict
 
I must vote Japanese as well. The Subaru will outlast the Chevy almost every time. Sad but true.
newtx is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:14 PM   #16 (permalink)
Eh?
 
Stare At The Sun's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Of the two - get the subaru.

I'd get a honda though if I were you.
Stare At The Sun is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 05:09 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Ilow's Avatar
 
Location: Pats country
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuasiMondo View Post
I can't vouch for the Subaru being reliable, not when my 98 Impreza spun a bearing for no apparent reason. This problem is more common than people believe with both 2.2 and 2.5L motors.

And no, I didn't run out of oil, nor did I neglect to do my regular 3,000 mi oil change.
you weren't using synthetic oil by any chance were you?
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about"
--Sam Harris
Ilow is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 01:26 AM   #18 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Portland
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtx View Post
I must vote Japanese as well. The Subaru will outlast the Chevy almost every time. Sad but true.
Less to do with the Subaru being a Japanese make and everything to do with there not being a single reliable American automobile having been produced in the last 20 years. All modern American cars are shit after the first few years.
Do not buy American. Get anything else.

Also, I had a '93 Subaru Legacy and it was an awesome vehicle for me. If I had been more responsible and gotten it's regular tuneup, it'd still be running today =P
PulpMind is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 03:48 AM   #19 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by PulpMind View Post
Less to do with the Subaru being a Japanese make and everything to do with there not being a single reliable American automobile having been produced in the last 20 years. All modern American cars are shit after the first few years.
Do not buy American. Get anything else.

Also, I had a '93 Subaru Legacy and it was an awesome vehicle for me. If I had been more responsible and gotten it's regular tuneup, it'd still be running today =P
I drove a 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis to 311,000 miles (from 267k) when my sister finally totaled it. I would have bet the house the motor had another 100,000 in it when she did it too.

Now I realize that that one car is not is not proof of anything, but I still see this car all over the place, late 80's for the years and almost always the Mercury, sometimes the - Crown Vic. They regularly have 200,000+ on them, and they're tanks. Perhaps it's because they're so cheap and easy to work on, but that can be just as important as 'shouldn't ever break but will be really expensive when it does'.

I'm just not buying the 'american cars are shitty' routine
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 07:41 AM   #20 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Yeah, the whole American cars = crap is a reactionary thing and completely untrue. I've seen an S-10 run to 700 000 km. I've seen a 1990 Bonneville keep running after two days without any oil in the pan. Not scientific, sure, but still kind of compelling.

Here's a pretty chart, comparing reliability scores from the top nameplates:



Turn out that according to JD Power the Chev is less likely to die on you.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 08:09 AM   #21 (permalink)
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Add another for subaru here.

If it has a sunroof, pop the cover of the dome light off and inspect for signs of water. Scooby sunroofs sometimes tend to leak into the light.
shakran is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 12:07 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Ilow's Avatar
 
Location: Pats country
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian View Post
Yeah, the whole American cars = crap is a reactionary thing and completely untrue. I've seen an S-10 run to 700 000 km. I've seen a 1990 Bonneville keep running after two days without any oil in the pan. Not scientific, sure, but still kind of compelling.

Here's a pretty chart, comparing reliability scores from the top nameplates:



Turn out that according to JD Power the Chev is less likely to die on you.
Well they are reasonably well thought of, but JD Power has been accused of being in the pockets of the American industry at times.
Survey 2006: Best Worst manufacturers - Manufacturer positions - Top Gear
The problem with consumer ratings is that there is a inherent bias to justify your own choice and expense and it always seems like every rating company has an axe to grind (in the Top Gear one it's an English company giving it to the French, although probably deservedly). To each his own, really. I've had 3 chevy's (only one of which ran any kind of well ('88 Beretta) and 2 Subarus (one i sold, running fine with 195,000 on the clock and my current '04 with 125,000 with nothing but routine maintenance done). And don't get me going about which was better in the snow...
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about"
--Sam Harris
Ilow is offline  
Old 06-25-2009, 01:37 PM   #23 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: Portland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian View Post
Yeah, the whole American cars = crap is a reactionary thing and completely untrue. I've seen an S-10 run to 700 000 km. I've seen a 1990 Bonneville keep running after two days without any oil in the pan. Not scientific, sure, but still kind of compelling.

Here's a pretty chart, comparing reliability scores from the top nameplates:



Turn out that according to JD Power the Chev is less likely to die on you.
JD Power & Associates isn't an independent review firm. It's basically paid for by auto makers (and whoever else) that want an award to show off in their commercials.
Consumer Reports is a better reference point.
PulpMind is offline  
Old 06-26-2009, 03:24 PM   #24 (permalink)
Psycho
 
desal75's Avatar
 
Location: Western New York
One thing to keep in mind is that after ten years the manufacturer no longer has to make replacement parts for the vehicle. I currently drive an Impreza and have had four other Subaru's but an eleven year old car is worth a couple grand at most.
__________________
The Man in Black fled across the desert and the Gunslinger followed.
desal75 is offline  
Old 06-28-2009, 09:42 AM   #25 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian View Post
Yeah, the whole American cars = crap is a reactionary thing and completely untrue.
Really? I know of a couple of car companies who may disagree with you, maybe if they didn't build shit cars they wouldn't have filed for bankruptcy protection, so yeah it's hardly reactionary, and far, far away from completely untrue.

Oh yeah, another vote for the Subaru.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 06-28-2009, 10:20 AM   #26 (permalink)
Addict
 
DaniGirl's Avatar
 
Location: Fucking Utah...
My aunt has had a Subaru forever. She went threw 5 cars in under 3 years. She is really tough on cars and the Subaru for 6 years and it is still going so it has to be a good car.
DaniGirl is offline  
Old 06-28-2009, 03:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
There are a lot of factors that led to the downfall of the North American auto industry. Saying that it was entirely a quality issue is a bit disingenuous.

The JD Power chart was simply the first one I found on Google. The point is that making a sweeping generalization about an entire industry segment is stupid.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
Old 06-28-2009, 04:06 PM   #28 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Here is a laundry list of other factors that would explain problems in the North American auto industry:
  • Marketing/branding management
  • Human resources management
  • Retailer support strategy
  • Executive strategy
  • Process management
  • Research and development strategy
When I consider these other things, it's hard for me to accept it was only (or even mainly) product quality that caused the problems.

Regardless, I'd vote for Subaru.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-28-2009, 05:08 PM   #29 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian View Post
There are a lot of factors that led to the downfall of the North American auto industry. Saying that it was entirely a quality issue is a bit disingenuous.

The JD Power chart was simply the first one I found on Google. The point is that making a sweeping generalization about an entire industry segment is stupid.
Umm where did I say it was entirely quality?
Quote:
The point is that making a sweeping generalization about an entire industry segment is stupid.
Kind if like this you mean?
Quote:
Yeah, the whole American cars = crap is a reactionary thing and completely untrue.
Seems like a rather sweeping generalization to me, that all American cars aren't crap, which is well rather stupid as we all know quite a few of them are steaming piles of shit.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder

Last edited by silent_jay; 06-28-2009 at 05:37 PM..
silent_jay is offline  
Old 07-01-2009, 05:25 PM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
This entire post has been deleted because it added nothing to the thread and was nothing more than an insult. Play nice.

Last edited by shakran; 07-01-2009 at 06:50 PM..
matthew330 is offline  
Old 07-01-2009, 06:00 PM   #31 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
There isn't any need to respond to insults. Let's get this thread back on track before it gets closed.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder

Last edited by shakran; 07-01-2009 at 06:54 PM.. Reason: decided to type something else
silent_jay is offline  
Old 07-01-2009, 08:14 PM   #32 (permalink)
Wise-ass Latino
 
QuasiMondo's Avatar
 
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hektore View Post
Now, I don't know a lot about cars, but I do know some things. Is it possible that this is related to a timing chain failure of some kind, because that is the only major problem I've heard about with Subaru. When the chain goes they need to be caught quickly or it will wreak havoc in short order.

Or you could just do what everyone has suggested to me - get the chain changed every 80k-100k miles. So for Fire: If you don't know when the chain was last changed, get it done just to be sure, the risk/reward for letting it go just isn't there.
The 2.5 DOHC's used a timing belt. If that went, I'd still be in the same boat, just with a lot more carnage, and no chance to limp it to a shop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilow View Post
you weren't using synthetic oil by any chance were you?
Nope, castrol 10W-30
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer.

-From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator
QuasiMondo is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 10:44 AM   #33 (permalink)
Upright
 
danbo's Avatar
 
Location: Midwest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto View Post
Jusst like to make a point that the Malibu is 6 years newer than the Subaru. That's gotta factor into the situation somehow...
No, not really.

Get the Subaru. You won't regret it.
danbo is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 07:29 PM   #34 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: west michigan
Keep in mind that the maintenance schedule for the subie is pretty involved. I had a 97 Legacy gt and the manufacturer's little chart said i was supposed to be changing the tranny fluid every 30,000 miles. I found the hard way that they mean it and it's the key to longevity in the trans.
downhill is offline  
 

Tags
buying, car, choose


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360