Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Knowledge and How-To (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-knowledge-how/)
-   -   Regenerative Mice (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-knowledge-how/95484-regenerative-mice.html)

xepherys 09-29-2005 09:01 AM

Regenerative Mice
 
The Article

Quote:

Originally Posted by From the article
02:00 AM Sep. 29, 2005 PT

Genetically altered mice discovered accidentally at the Wistar Institute in Pennsylvania have the seemingly miraculous ability to regenerate like a salamander, and even regrow vital organs.

Researchers systematically amputated digits and damaged various organs of the mice, including the heart, liver and brain, most of which grew back.

The results stunned scientists because if such regeneration is possible in this mammal, it might also be possible in humans.

The researchers also made a remarkable second discovery: When cells from the regenerative mice were injected into normal mice, the normal mice adopted the ability to regenerate. And when the special mice bred with normal mice, their offspring inherited souped-up regeneration capabilities.

The mice, known as the MRL strain, were genetically engineered and inbred to develop lupus. But researchers don't know why exactly the animals' injuries heal so well.

"If we identified the molecules that allow mice that don't regenerate to regenerate ... and I think we could be close to doing that, then I think the next step is to consider what these molecules would do in individuals," said Ellen Heber-Katz, a professor of molecular and cellular oncogenesis at Wistar, located on the University of Pennsylvania campus in Philadelphia.

Heber-Katz discovered the strain in 1998 accidentally while working with mice altered genetically for studying autoimmune diseases.

She had pierced holes in the ears of the genetically altered mice to distinguish them from a control group, but they healed quickly with no scarring.

She and her colleagues wanted to find out what other parts of this strain of mice would grow back, so they snipped off the tip of a tail, severed a spinal cord, poked an eye and cauterized various internal organs.

The incredible wound-healing they observed abruptly shifted the focus of Heber-Katz's lab's research from autoimmune disease to regenerative medicine. The researchers began hunting for the specific genes that gave the mice their special powers. They are focusing on three specific genes at the moment, but she suspects that many more likely contribute to the regenerative abilities.

While some amphibians can regrow body parts, mammals for the most part do not have that ability, making this a very special mouse indeed. If the results can be translated to humans, it would be a dream come true for people who want to live forever.

"When those genes (responsible for the mice regeneration) are found, we can start to think about manipulating them in humans with drugs or (later) gene therapy, thereby enhancing our own regeneration," said Aubrey de Grey, a longevity expert and editor of the scientific journal Rejuvenation Research.

Other labs have also begun to join the investigation.

The mice seem to exhibit regenerative capabilities similar to that of human fetuses in the first trimester, said Dr. Stephen Badylak, a surgery research professor and director of the Center for Pre-Clinical Tissue Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh's McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine.

"It offers us insight into a more fetal-like healing response, where scar tissue is minimal and regeneration is abundant," Badylak said. "It's a great model to examine healing mechanisms and use that information to see if we can stimulate the same thing to happen in people."

Heber-Katz said she will soon publish her results on digit regrowth in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

Heber-Katz presented new data showing that the strain of mice can also grow back severed digits at the Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence conference in Cambridge, England. ("Engineered negligible senescence" is a fancy term for life extension.)


xepherys 09-29-2005 09:02 AM

My biggest question is... how soon can I get these genes? I know a lot of people are less than eager to get into genetic experimentation but I, for one, am quite so. I think that discoveries like this and applications of such discoveries within humans will be of great benefit. Any thoughts?

Redlemon 09-29-2005 09:26 AM

Holy shit.

My only question is, why is this merely being reported in Wired? I just did a Google news search on MRL mice, and only got this and one Chinese article from August 30, 2005. Shouldn't this be front-page news?

ObieX 09-29-2005 09:56 AM

Hmm.. if merely injecting the mouce cells into another mouse gets the gene to pass on, it may be all that is required to get it to pass to other animals too. They should give it a shot with another animal and see what happens.

xepherys 09-29-2005 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redlemon
Holy shit.

My only question is, why is this merely being reported in Wired? I just did a Google news search on MRL mice, and only got this and one Chinese article from August 30, 2005. Shouldn't this be front-page news?


The article mentions that she has not yet published her findings, but soon will, and also that it will be discussed at a medical conference in England. After these two items take place, you'll see more about it. Of course, when the U.S. media gets ahold of it, prepare for a bit of sensationalization.

mr sticky 09-29-2005 11:32 AM

Fascinating. I'm curious though about the long term effects, such as cancer risks.
This will be interesting to watch.

Redlemon 09-29-2005 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr sticky
I'm curious though about the long term effects, such as cancer risks.

Or, for that matter, lupus.
Quote:

The mice, known as the MRL strain, were genetically engineered and inbred to develop lupus.

doncalypso 09-29-2005 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xepherys
My biggest question is... how soon can I get these genes? I know a lot of people are less than eager to get into genetic experimentation but I, for one, am quite so. I think that discoveries like this and applications of such discoveries within humans will be of great benefit. Any thoughts?


What you should be asking is whether we have genes analogous to that regenerative gene found in the mice.

While the idea of being able to regenerate tissue sounds all nice and dandy you must remember that the very nature of cancer is that it consits of cells whose proliferation (i.e. regenerative abilities) is being overexpressed and escapes all regulatory mechanisms that govern normal development.

I wouldn't hold my breath and expect great benefits to come out from this... not for another 60 to 80 years anyways.

xepherys 09-29-2005 12:09 PM

That's okay, I still plan to be alive in 60 to 80 years. I'm patient...

reiii 10-03-2005 05:58 PM

sounds cool but they've done a lot of cool things in mice that havent translated to humans (yet) such as:

making paralyzed mice walk
toying with the aging process
making blind mice see

ObieX 10-03-2005 06:07 PM

The main reason that is true is due to extreme restrictions on human testing, and sometimes the methods used. Plus of course millions of dollars. In a more receptive world many of these things would already be in use benefiting mankind.

reiii 10-03-2005 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ObieX
The main reason that is true is due to extreme restrictions on human testing, and sometimes the methods used. Plus of course millions of dollars. In a more receptive world many of these things would already be in use benefiting mankind.

possibly, but many of the restrictions are warrented. Human testing brings to mind Nazi doc's the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment and other such monstrosoties

ObieX 10-03-2005 07:27 PM

I see your point, but the main problem with a lot of those experiments is that the people being tested on didn't give their consent. I don't argue against a level of control, but the current level required is absurd in most countries.
While one may agrue that the testing of a menthod/drug/device, that may not be perfect, on consenting adults is morally wrong. I have to argue that waiting is just as morally wrong, if not worse.. and really only results in prolonged suffering and deaths of many people who could benefit.

I mean, if i know i have a month to live w/ cancer, and i know a guy out there is working on a cure, I would go and give it a shot. What would i have to lose, besides my life, which would be over in a month anyway? Even if the test doesn't work, and i die, it will atleast have been a useful death. But, i guess, this is sorta dipping into the "right to die" stuff, and I've already jacked this thread enough. :p

Zeraph 10-04-2005 09:27 AM

So I guess wolverine wouldn't be a super hero anymore :)

xepherys 10-04-2005 10:25 AM

ObieX-

I agree wholeheartedly. Frankly, even up to and including "right to die" issues, I believe our bodies and lives are for us to make decisions about.

Charlatan 10-04-2005 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reiii
sounds cool but they've done a lot of cool things in mice that havent translated to humans (yet) such as:

making blind mice see

Glad to see this... I just want to know if they can repair the damage done to their tails by the farmer's wife...

1010011010 10-04-2005 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeraph
So I guess wolverine wouldn't be a super hero anymore :)

Did you forget that part about the adamantium plated skeleton?
The spring-loaded knives tucked away in his forearms?

Do these mice even have groovy yellow tights?

Pfft.

ObieX 10-04-2005 06:05 PM

Yea, but the only reason he was able to survive the implanted metal was due to his regenerative capabilities. weeee

shakran 10-04-2005 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xepherys
The article mentions that she has not yet published her findings, but soon will, and also that it will be discussed at a medical conference in England. After these two items take place, you'll see more about it. Of course, when the U.S. media gets ahold of it, prepare for a bit of sensationalization.


More media denigration for no reason. Why would we sensationalize this? It's a pretty sensational story to begin with and doesn't need any embelishment. After all, if it's possible in mice, it's probably eventually possible in humans which leads to incredible medical opportunities down the road. What exactly could we "sensationalize" that would make it a more exciting story?

xepherys 10-05-2005 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakran
More media denigration for no reason. Why would we sensationalize this? It's a pretty sensational story to begin with and doesn't need any embelishment. After all, if it's possible in mice, it's probably eventually possible in humans which leads to incredible medical opportunities down the road. What exactly could we "sensationalize" that would make it a more exciting story?

Oh, just to name a few things I can see:

* "Work is soon to be underway to find out if this can be applied to humans" - untrue.

* "This could be the solution to cancer, heart disease, et cetera." - possibly true, but unsubstantiated for humans


Realistically I take most of what I hear on the news with a grain of salt. A good example of sensationalization is the annual outbreak of what affects our children. Some years you hear nothing but tragedy in the news about kids drowning in their own pools. Statistically, this number doesn't change much, but some summers you hear about it like every other child on your block is going to drown. Some years it's kids left in cars. Some years it's poison in Halloween candy. Realistically, no year has much of an identifiable spike in these activities, but the news media needs to keep their ratings up, so when the summer gets to boring, they search for one or two stories that'll make people tune in. It's bullshit for the most part, and best case scenario, over sensationalizing things. Sure wish we had good news program managers like Fred Friendly instead of the boneheads we have now. News should be about news, not about ratings. Man, I almost sound like a republican *shiver*


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360