For the DnD Players: Opinions on 3.5 editioN? - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

GrayWolf · 09-08-2003, 09:24 AM

A purposeless placement of new rules because the company needed more money?

Or a truly wonderful addition to the game.

clydestinkybeef · 09-08-2003, 10:42 PM

I haven't actually gotten to take an indepth look into 3.5, could you please site some of the rules as examples? Or just give a broad description of them.

krazykemist · 09-08-2003, 10:47 PM

I for one will not be shelling out another $90 for a rules update.
I am starting to get tired of filling Wizards pockets.
I used to be able to afford to buy almost all new books that came out.
Now I cant afford to buy half of them. (Im only talking Wizards stuff not D20)
The books have not become larger yet the price keeps going up.
I could see maybe every 4-5 years doing an overhaul on the rules and presenting a new set of books, but none of this .5 crap.
I for one will be sticking with 3rd edition for now and the errata and addendums from the website.

Dilbert1234567 · 09-08-2003, 11:08 PM

if it were a pamflet or something simmilar i would get it but they are re releasing it and that is gay im not shelling out another 100 bucks to them

rogue49 · 09-09-2003, 02:53 AM

sucks shit.

They have made the game more confusing than ever.

GakFace · 09-10-2003, 09:02 PM

The only thing I heard "GOOD" about it, is that they fixed Rangers.. to how they should have been in 3.0

two_tailed · 09-17-2003, 05:17 PM

I havn't even heard about this until this forum. What BS is this? I knew it was going to be bad when TSR sold out to Wizards.

Spinach_Indeed · 09-18-2003, 06:31 AM

I'm not planning on buying 3.5 either. The only thing I've heard about it are the changes to the Gnome Bard.

Scorpion23 · 09-19-2003, 07:23 PM

I'm sticking to 3.0. While the upgrade from 2nd to 3rd edition was welcome by most, and simplified the game a bit, a new edition out after only 3 years is too much. The only reason they didn't call it 4th edition is because they knew no one would buy it.
I DM a group on the weekends and I'm probably just going to incorporate some of the material like the new ranger stats into the game, but I'm not buying $100 in new books.

Ogre840 · 09-22-2003, 10:01 PM

3.5 sucks!!!

3.0 isnt bad, but i hate how its the same core rules as ALL OTHER D20 fucking games, that keeps it from being D&fuckingD!

THAC0, F.A.R.T., and shit like that made D&D, D&D...

FUCK WIZARDS!

Mephisto2 · 09-23-2003, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spinach_Indeed
The only thing I've heard about it are the changes to the Gnome Bard.

That's got to be the funniest one-liner I've ever read.

LOL

Mr Mephisto

NeverBorn · 09-23-2003, 10:02 AM

3.5 = $

Thats bullshit in my book. no way inhell I'm shelling out 100 bucks for 3 new books with no storyline and all rules.

Mr.Deflok · 09-23-2003, 04:12 PM

Really? The new DnD game TEMPLE OF ELEMENTAL EVIL is supposed to using 3.5 and they're using that fact as a selling point. DnD is beyond me, only played it once when I was young, loved it but never played again. Nice to see it still going strong all these years later.

09-08-2003, 09:24 AM	#1 (permalink)
GrayWolf Tilted	For the DnD Players: Opinions on 3.5 editioN? A purposeless placement of new rules because the company needed more money? Or a truly wonderful addition to the game.

09-08-2003, 10:47 PM	#3 (permalink)
krazykemist Psycho Location: New Orleans	I for one will not be shelling out another $90 for a rules update. I am starting to get tired of filling Wizards pockets. I used to be able to afford to buy almost all new books that came out. Now I cant afford to buy half of them. (Im only talking Wizards stuff not D20) The books have not become larger yet the price keeps going up. I could see maybe every 4-5 years doing an overhaul on the rules and presenting a new set of books, but none of this .5 crap. I for one will be sticking with 3rd edition for now and the errata and addendums from the website. __________________ "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself." -- Tolstoy

09-08-2003, 11:08 PM	#4 (permalink)
Dilbert1234567 Devils Cabana Boy Location: Central Coast CA	if it were a pamflet or something simmilar i would get it but they are re releasing it and that is gay im not shelling out another 100 bucks to them __________________ Donate Blood! "Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen

09-10-2003, 09:02 PM	#6 (permalink)
GakFace Go Ninja, Go Ninja Go!! Location: IN, USA	The only thing I heard "GOOD" about it, is that they fixed Rangers.. to how they should have been in 3.0 __________________ RoboBlaster: Welcome to the club! Not that I'm in the club. And there really isn'a a club in the first place. But if there was a club and if I was in it, I would definitely welcome you to it.

09-18-2003, 06:31 AM	#8 (permalink)
Spinach_Indeed Banned? Location: Artic Tundra	I'm not planning on buying 3.5 either. The only thing I've heard about it are the changes to the Gnome Bard. __________________ Spinach in Need is Spinach Indeed

09-08-2003, 10:42 PM	#2 (permalink)
clydestinkybeef Loser	I haven't actually gotten to take an indepth look into 3.5, could you please site some of the rules as examples? Or just give a broad description of them.

09-09-2003, 02:53 AM	#5 (permalink)
rogue49 Loser	sucks shit. They have made the game more confusing than ever.

09-17-2003, 05:17 PM	#7 (permalink)
two_tailed Upright	I havn't even heard about this until this forum. What BS is this? I knew it was going to be bad when TSR sold out to Wizards.

09-19-2003, 07:23 PM	#9 (permalink)
Scorpion23 Psycho	I'm sticking to 3.0. While the upgrade from 2nd to 3rd edition was welcome by most, and simplified the game a bit, a new edition out after only 3 years is too much. The only reason they didn't call it 4th edition is because they knew no one would buy it. I DM a group on the weekends and I'm probably just going to incorporate some of the material like the new ranger stats into the game, but I'm not buying $100 in new books. __________________ "Empirically observed covariation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for causality" - Edward Tufte

09-22-2003, 10:01 PM	#10 (permalink)
Ogre840 Banned Location: OlyWa	3.5 sucks!!! 3.0 isnt bad, but i hate how its the same core rules as ALL OTHER D20 fucking games, that keeps it from being D&fuckingD! THAC0, F.A.R.T., and shit like that made D&D, D&D... FUCK WIZARDS!

09-23-2003, 10:02 AM	#12 (permalink)
NeverBorn I'm a pepper bitch..	3.5 = $ Thats bullshit in my book. no way inhell I'm shelling out 100 bucks for 3 new books with no storyline and all rules.

09-23-2003, 04:12 PM	#13 (permalink)
Mr.Deflok Blood + Fire Location: New Zealand	Really? The new DnD game TEMPLE OF ELEMENTAL EVIL is supposed to using 3.5 and they're using that fact as a selling point. DnD is beyond me, only played it once when I was young, loved it but never played again. Nice to see it still going strong all these years later.