12-07-2009, 03:24 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Submit to me, you know you want to
Location: Lilburn, Ga
|
Sherlock Holmes
I have been looking forward to this since I heard about it and I just saw the trailer wooohooo
Anyone else excited about it? I plan on being in the theater Christmas Day to see it
__________________
I want the diabetic plan that comes with rollover carbs. I dont like the unused one expiring at midnite!! |
12-07-2009, 03:27 PM | #2 (permalink) |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
I've totally wanted to see this since I first saw the trailer a number of week ago. I'll probably see this over the holidays.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
12-07-2009, 03:40 PM | #4 (permalink) |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
This is Trailer #1 (and the first one I saw). I like it best. It has the bed scene in it.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
12-07-2009, 03:49 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
You know... all I see when I look at this are Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law... I don't see Holmes and Watson. I see two popular movie stars. This could be any fucking movie.
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
12-07-2009, 05:40 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Minion of Joss
Location: The Windy City
|
I am cautiously optimistic. On the one hand, I think this re-envisioning is interesting, and I love RDJ and Jude Law; on the other hand, I am not wild about the idea of Holmes as ladies' man-- that seems to just directly contradict the character in the canon for no reason-- and I hate Guy Ritchie.
Will it balance out? I don't know. But I certainly plan to go see.
__________________
Dull sublunary lovers love, Whose soul is sense, cannot admit Absence, because it doth remove That thing which elemented it. (From "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" by John Donne) |
12-07-2009, 07:02 PM | #9 (permalink) |
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
I dunno. I some how see this as Wild Wild West 2: The London Stories. I was excited when I heard they we working on it. I was excited when I heard the casting. I was no longer excited when I saw the trailer.
I don't know why that's what I think of, but I do for some reason. I'm a big Sherlock Holmes fan and I just don't see them as Holmes and Watson.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not. |
12-07-2009, 10:18 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Baltimoron
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
|
Quote:
I mean, I've been reading the original stories in bits and pieces over the past couple months, but even so the movie doesn't seem to be all that true to the actual stories even taking into account that it is supposedly an entirely original plot. Looks really cool, though. Would probably be better with Hugh Laurie as Holmes, though that might be too obvious a choice
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun |
|
12-08-2009, 03:11 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Psycho
|
I read it being described as being very faithful to the old stories by contrast with the 100 years or so of unfaithful adaptations - but I don't know if this was tongue in cheek or sincere. I wouldn't have cast these two as Holmes and Watson but I'm really excited by the trailers. I really rate Guy Ritchie and the cast is good - especially Jude Law and Rachel McAdams - and I can see Downey Jr doing quite a flamboyant, Willy Wonka-ish Holmes.... hmm. I'm fairly certain it's going to be better than both Without A Clue and Young Sherlock Holmes but I'm equally sure I won't like it as much as those old Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce ones.
|
12-08-2009, 03:15 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Submit to me, you know you want to
Location: Lilburn, Ga
|
I LOVED Young Sherlock Holmes...when it came out...havent seen it in years though so I dont know how I'd like it as an adult
__________________
I want the diabetic plan that comes with rollover carbs. I dont like the unused one expiring at midnite!! |
01-05-2010, 05:15 AM | #16 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: The True North Strong and Free!
|
So who saw the movie? Went with the wife last night and we both really enjoyed it. Looking forward to the sequels!
__________________
"It is impossible to obtain a conviction for sodomy from an English jury. Half of them don't believe that it can physically be done, and the other half are doing it." Winston Churchill |
01-05-2010, 08:27 AM | #18 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: The True North Strong and Free!
|
Yeah, I was totally hoping for that with the fights with the giant and Blackwood.
__________________
"It is impossible to obtain a conviction for sodomy from an English jury. Half of them don't believe that it can physically be done, and the other half are doing it." Winston Churchill |
Tags |
holmes, sherlock |
|
|