Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Soccer outing collides with swingers party (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/99545-soccer-outing-collides-swingers-party.html)

Xazy 01-06-2006 03:33 AM

Soccer outing collides with swingers party
 
Wow this is just so wrong.

Quote:

Kids see the wrong exhibition game
Soccer outing collides with swingers party
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
ASSOCIATED PRESS

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Some teenage soccer players and their parents saw more sights than they wanted when they stayed at a hotel where about 200 scantily dressed, partner-swapping partygoers were celebrating New Year's Eve.

Paul Camporini brought his wife, eighth-grade son and seventh-grade daughter from Safety Harbor and said he had to "delicately explain to my Catholic schoolchildren that swingers change partners during the evening."

"My biggest gripe is that the hotel had two distinctly different groups under the same roof," said Camporini, 49. "A soccer team and middle-aged swingers should not have been booked together."

The families said the sexually adventurous partygoers sometimes flashed breasts and bare buttocks in front of the children as they sashayed through the hotel atrium. The parents described the dress at the Crowne Plaza Hotel-Airport in Orlando as "worse than prostitutes."

"We thought we were coming to Orlando, not the Las Vegas Strip," said Mark Gilbert, the father of a boy who plays on the Clearwater Chargers, a group of 13-and-under players from Florida.

The teams booked the $92-a-night rooms for Disney's Soccer Showcase and said hotel management did not tell them about the swingers' party or try to keep the partygoers away from the children.

Hotel managers did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment yesterday. All of the swingers had checked out of the hotel by late Sunday.

"We're not prudes by any means," said Rob Young of Greenville, S.C., but he added that his two daughters, Leah, 13, and Lauren, 11, asked questions he struggled to answer. "We would have liked to have been informed when we checked into the hotel so we could have made other arrangements.

"The kids could see through the glass atrium into the ballroom where naked people were dancing. There were exposed breasts, thongs and see-through dresses on women who were not wearing any underwear."

Young said he complained to hotel management and to John Hollis, an off-duty Orlando police officer hired by the hotel for a New Year's Eve security detail. He said neither did anything to help.

Lt. John Mina, a watch commander for the Orlando Police Department, said Hollis didn't witness anything illegal.
I do not know if legal action can be taken against the hotel, but if i was a parent I know I would be making calls. As well as calling every media, and make as much noise as possible. To me this is just wrong, I have no clue how a hotel can do something like that, but I would raise hell.

<edit>
Another article

flat5 01-06-2006 03:53 AM

So the kids learned something about life, if they did not know already.
Some people live life differently than their parents.

JustJess 01-06-2006 06:20 AM

Actually, I think it's bullshit that anyone would expect the hotel to not book both parties. They're in it to make MONEY. However, IF the room was not all opaque walls, the hotel should have made other arrangements for the swingers' party. If the walls were perfectly opaque, the swingers should realize that they are in a public place, which means keeping their private lives out of everyone else's life. Have a party, get naked, do whatever you want - but keep it in the room you booked, since it's not your right to decide what the kids staying at the hotel learn about life today.

But overall, not a big enough deal to be making such a huge fuss. I'm sure the kids thought it was very amusing. :)

maleficent 01-06-2006 06:24 AM

Quote:

The families said the sexually adventurous partygoers sometimes flashed breasts and bare buttocks in front of the children as they sashayed through the hotel atrium
Ok, ,so mooning is legal in maryland now, not sure about florida :D . it's incredibly low class of these imbeciles to do that... I don't care what people do behind closed doors... but when you're in public - behave respectably - flashing another adult in a hotel lobby is low class.. flashing a child is beyond that...

the hotel could have and should have said keep your antics to your own rooms...

A few years ago, I went to an 'event' in the DC area - basically it was a party for alternative lifestyles... It was interesting... the hotel had made sure that the party area was blocked off from prying eyes (they had curtains around the doors so doors couldn't be opened and non-invited guests couldn't peak in.. They also told all the guests - when in public - act accordingly... (otherwise they wouldn't be invited back) people behaved.

Charlatan 01-06-2006 06:49 AM

I agree that they should have had no problems booking both parties BUT, as Mal suggests, they should have taken steps to ensure the swingers were kept seperate. And upon any suggestion that there was nudity in the lobby, they should have cracked down on them.

I am pretty sure that the organizers of the event, had they known what was happening, could have taken steps to prevent further occurences.

The hotel could have also made sure that the soccer players didn't have a view of the glass atrium... just put them on the other side of the building.

Randerolf 01-06-2006 09:09 AM

Were the children dressed like "Catholic schoolchildren?" Maybe people thought they were a part of the show. :)

SERPENT7 01-06-2006 09:18 AM

I think getting upset about a little naked flesh is silly.
If not for the protestant fear and loathing of the body which has seeped into our collective programming, this would not even be a discussion.

Gatorade Frost 01-06-2006 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SERPENT7
I think getting upset about a little naked flesh is silly.
If not for the protestant fear and loathing of the body which has seeped into our collective programming, this would not even be a discussion.

So you would be okay with me walking up to your son or daughter and dropping my pants?

It's just a [lot of] naked flesh.

5757 01-06-2006 09:38 AM

I understand that the parents had booked the rooms, paid for them, and were settled in. . BUT had I been the one there with my kids I would have went somewhere else asked for a refund later.

I'm sure it would have been impossible to find another hotel on such short notice so thats when you use your brain. You cover your kids eyes, take them straight to the room and make them stay in there! Not to hard huh.

Maybe the group of swingers didn't inform the hotel that they were going to be boinking eachother all night.

:rolleyes:

snowy 01-06-2006 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustJess
Actually, I think it's bullshit that anyone would expect the hotel to not book both parties. They're in it to make MONEY. However, IF the room was not all opaque walls, the hotel should have made other arrangements for the swingers' party. If the walls were perfectly opaque, the swingers should realize that they are in a public place, which means keeping their private lives out of everyone else's life. Have a party, get naked, do whatever you want - but keep it in the room you booked, since it's not your right to decide what the kids staying at the hotel learn about life today.

But overall, not a big enough deal to be making such a huge fuss. I'm sure the kids thought it was very amusing. :)

I'm with you, JustJess. The hotel has no obligation to do anything here. They're a business. People should be expected to control themselves and behave appropriately in public--something these adults were clearly not doing, especially around children. The hotel isn't to blame for that behavior, or their inability to control it--that's what the POLICE are for.

Charlatan 01-06-2006 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SERPENT7
I think getting upset about a little naked flesh is silly.
If not for the protestant fear and loathing of the body which has seeped into our collective programming, this would not even be a discussion.

The issue isn't naked flesh. It lacivious naked flesh... sexualized naked flesh.

There is a difference.

Sultana 01-06-2006 10:44 AM

I don't think this should have been allowed to be an issue...as far as I know just because one is a swinger doesn't mean that public nudity nor any other inappropriate public behavior is a part of that. The Swinger Event Coordinator (assuming there was one) should have stopped this behavior, and if they didn't, the hotel should have stepped in immediately. I don't understand why that didn't happen.

Even in Canada you can't go around in public with your naughty bits hanging out, eh? ;P

Charlatan 01-06-2006 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sultana
I don't think this should have been allowed to be an issue...as far as I know just because one is a swinger doesn't mean that public nudity nor any other inappropriate public behavior is a part of that. The Swinger Event Coordinator (assuming there was one) should have stopped this behavior, and if they didn't, the hotel should have stepped in immediately. I don't understand why that didn't happen.

That was the point I was trying to make earlier. It shoudn't have had the opportunity to be an issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sultana
Even in Canada you can't go around in public with your naughty bits hanging out, eh? ;P

Actually, women are legally allowed to be topless in Ontario. I'm not sure how many have tested the law since Gwen Jacobs helped to strike down the old one. ;)

BigBen 01-06-2006 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sultana
...Even in Canada you can't go around in public with your naughty bits hanging out, eh? ;P

Sure you can. Be careful, because exposed skin freezes in under a minute.

http://www.weather.gov/om/windchill/.../windchill.gif

Carno 01-06-2006 11:21 AM

Oh man, that is awesome. I wish I had been staying at that hotel that night :thumbsup:

raeanna74 01-06-2006 11:29 AM

We are swingers and would not approve of such behavior by swingers. It was the swingers responsibility to refrain from strutting their stuff in front of everyone. They will now find it hard to find any accomodations for parties anywhere in that area now. It's their own fault. They could have and should have known better. If the hosts did not deal with 'exposure' problems then they will be dealing with it now. We've been to parties in hotels where more than once. Every time the hotel sectioned off portions for swinger use and requested that the swingers remained appropriately dressed in all PUBLIC portions of the hotel. If anyone did not abide by that rule they were quickly and discretely removed from the party by the Swinger Party Host's security detail. It's all part of acting responsibly.

Not everyone thinks the same way with regards to modesty but it's silly to think you can impose your 'values' regarding nudity on children without the approval of their parents. Have some consideration people.

maleficent 01-06-2006 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onesnowyowl
The hotel has no obligation to do anything here

if someone has a boisterous party in a hotel and the other guests complain - the hotel has an obligation to ask the rabblerousers to pipe down.

the hotel is providing a service -- but they also are responsible for all the guests comfort... if there's a drunk in a lobby screaming -I'd except that he would be removed... theres no difference..

Brewmaniac 01-06-2006 12:12 PM

The hotel is definitely in business but part of being in business is protecting your interests. By allowing the scenario to unfold as it did the management set the entire hotel up for negative publicity and potential legal action.
It would have been easy to take to take precautions already mentioned, separating them etc. but far easier just avoid the problem altogether by not booking the two on the same night. On a pure business standpoint the ramifications of such a snafu could be more costly than loosing one of the bookings.

hemiram57 01-06-2006 12:33 PM

How come nothing happened on any of my soccer trips like that? Not that the hotel should be in trouble, but they should take a few more precautions when they are going to have "alternative" guests.

optik_nerve 01-06-2006 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randerolf
Were the children dressed like "Catholic schoolchildren?" Maybe people thought they were a part of the show. :)

That's so wrong. :)

Xazy 01-06-2006 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brewmaniac
The hotel is definitely in business but part of being in business is protecting your interests. By allowing the scenario to unfold as it did the management set the entire hotel up for negative publicity and potential legal action.
It would have been easy to take to take precautions already mentioned, separating them etc. but far easier just avoid the problem altogether by not booking the two on the same night. On a pure business standpoint the ramifications of such a snafu could be more costly than loosing one of the bookings.

The question is not if they should book two such parties, but as many people said ensuring that they do not cross. In my mind the hotel failed since that the swingers 'events' did not overlap with their other quests. I do not care what you do, but the hotel should be concerned about the sexual aspect in a family oriented place.

Brewmaniac 01-06-2006 01:31 PM

Knowing you have booked a youth event and a sexually primiscus party on the same night doesn't make for good business or public relations.

Strange Famous 01-06-2006 01:52 PM

my opinion - big deal. I dont know any 13 year old boy that is gonna mind seeing some bared breasts.

I think people go crazy with all this "oh the children!" stuff sometimes, way I see it no one got hurt or anything.

Suave 01-06-2006 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sultana
I don't think this should have been allowed to be an issue...as far as I know just because one is a swinger doesn't mean that public nudity nor any other inappropriate public behavior is a part of that. The Swinger Event Coordinator (assuming there was one) should have stopped this behavior, and if they didn't, the hotel should have stepped in immediately. I don't understand why that didn't happen.

Even in Canada you can't go around in public with your naughty bits hanging out, eh? ;P

I believe a court recently found that the dual upper naughty bits on women are okay for public access. :D

Toaster126 01-06-2006 02:08 PM

The police officer watching the event said nothing illegal happened. Therefore, I think the parents need to STFU and if they have a problem with it, they should have gotten refunds and left. Was it classy of the swingers to do all of that? Not really, but they didn't do anything illegal, so it's their right.

pig 01-06-2006 02:12 PM

All I can say is that if these were the same type of soccer players (and I know the little bastards who used to play in both Clearwater and Greenville); 13 years old or not, those kids (myself included) would have been more intent on sneaking in to the Swingers section and maybe stealing some alchohol or setting them on fire or superglueing their dangling bits to various objects than anything else.

The article doesn't say whether or not the hotel managers tried to get the swingers to swing a little less publicly. They may have, but sometimes its tough to keep a group in control when they don't want to be in control. I know. I've been that group before that everyone else hated. I'm not condong the behavior, but lets face it. People make a veritable sport out of fucking with hotel staff, and it's New Year's Eve. I'm wondering which genius decided to put the soccer tournament in Orlando on New Year's Eve weekend. That's just asking for trouble, in my opinion.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360