Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-01-2005, 08:16 AM   #41 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximusveritas
Yes, they have a greater chance of escaping without being raped. But those who fail to escape after attempting to physically fight back are more likely to be severely injured.

I've never seen ANY data that supports this theory.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 09:25 AM   #42 (permalink)
Fireball
 
Randerolf's Avatar
 
Location: ~
Is this the same thing as rigging a gun to your door to shoot trespassers? I believe that in such cases in the US, the person harmed can be sued in civil court and maybe criminal court as well.
Randerolf is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 09:40 AM   #43 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randerolf
Is this the same thing as rigging a gun to your door to shoot trespassers? I believe that in such cases in the US, the person harmed can be sued in civil court and maybe criminal court as well.
We should get one of our lawyers to chine in on this but I think there is a big difference here...
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:04 AM   #44 (permalink)
Americow, the Beautiful
 
Supple Cow's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, D.C.
The big difference is that trespassers are violating property and rapists are violating persons. It's called self defense.
__________________
"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed."
(Michael Jordan)
Supple Cow is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:08 AM   #45 (permalink)
Rookie
 
Gatorade Frost's Avatar
 
I think one of the things is that if you lose your erection, all's fine and dandy, it may or may not come off, but then you've got a bunch of huge holes in your penis for blood to come out and that's gonna take a while to heal up and you'll need a lot of bandages.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
So you want to have a device that, when the woman is raped, discharges a poison? Keep in mind it's still IN her body when the thing is triggered, so any dye or poison or irritant you stuff in it is going to get her too.

I also specifically said that it probably wouldn't work for that one reason in my above post. But yeah, if it could potentially work it would probably have to be on the highest barb of the thing so that it wouldn't you know, get out, but I can see ways it could work effectively with little problems for a person using it for protection.
__________________
I got in a fight one time with a really big guy, and he said, "I'm going to mop the floor with your face." I said, "You'll be sorry." He said, "Oh, yeah? Why?" I said, "Well, you won't be able to get into the corners very well."
Emo Philips
Gatorade Frost is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:15 AM   #46 (permalink)
Omnipotent Ruler Of The Tiny Universe In My Mind
 
mystmarimatt's Avatar
 
Location: Oreegawn
There's actually historical precedence for this sort of device. One was made during the...Renaissance, If I remember correctly. Although it was super, super painful for the women to wear, as it was made of, you know, iron. I bet it was pretty clunky.

I don't really have an opinion either way on this one.
__________________
Words of Wisdom:

If you could really get to know someone and know that they weren't lying to you, then you would know the world was real. Because you could agree on things, you could compare notes. That must be why people get married or make Art. So they'll be able to really know something and not go insane.
mystmarimatt is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:18 AM   #47 (permalink)
Fade out
 
Location: in love
Fantastic idea. I hope it truly protects the women who use it.

Sweetpea
__________________
Having a Pet Will Change Your Life!
Looking for a great pet?! Click Here!
"I am the Type of Person Who Can Get Away With A lot, Simply Because I Don't Ask Permission for the Privilege of Being Myself"
Sweetpea is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:22 AM   #48 (permalink)
Fade out
 
Location: in love
Quote:
Originally Posted by mystmarimatt
There's actually historical precedence for this sort of device. One was made during the...Renaissance, If I remember correctly. Although it was super, super painful for the women to wear, as it was made of, you know, iron. I bet it was pretty clunky.

I don't really have an opinion either way on this one.
ummm, check your facts, chastity belts were forced on the women by the men (their husband's usually) to ensure fidelity. There is no comparison here.

This is a device that will PROTECT women and will be their choice to wear. The only person it will affect is the individual that chooses to rape.


Sweetpea
__________________
Having a Pet Will Change Your Life!
Looking for a great pet?! Click Here!
"I am the Type of Person Who Can Get Away With A lot, Simply Because I Don't Ask Permission for the Privilege of Being Myself"
Sweetpea is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:27 AM   #49 (permalink)
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetpea
ummm, check your facts, chastity belts were forced on the women by the men (their husband's usually) to ensure fidelity. There is no comparison here.

This is a device that will PROTECT women and will be their choice to wear. The only person it will affect is the individual that chooses to rape.


Sweetpea
Actually, they were mainly used by fathers to protect what they saw as "property". There's a reason why they're called "chastity" belts--they were meant to insure that the father's property--the daughter--remained chaste until marriage. A damaged daughter would not claim as high a bride-price as one left inviolate and pure.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:29 AM   #50 (permalink)
Fade out
 
Location: in love
Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedrider
Is the incident of rape really THAT high? or is it post-desegregation paranoia?

read the article. REPORTED rapes in south africa were 50,000 last year... that was the reported ones, it's typically much higher if you count the unreported attacks.

this is an idea that deserves some merit.

Sweetpea
__________________
Having a Pet Will Change Your Life!
Looking for a great pet?! Click Here!
"I am the Type of Person Who Can Get Away With A lot, Simply Because I Don't Ask Permission for the Privilege of Being Myself"
Sweetpea is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:35 AM   #51 (permalink)
Omnipotent Ruler Of The Tiny Universe In My Mind
 
mystmarimatt's Avatar
 
Location: Oreegawn
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetpea
ummm, check your facts, chastity belts were forced on the women by the men (their husband's usually) to ensure fidelity. There is no comparison here.

This is a device that will PROTECT women and will be their choice to wear. The only person it will affect is the individual that chooses to rape.


Sweetpea
I wasn't trying to comment on the use or methodology behind the device. Please don't make assumptions about what I do or do not know, I'm fully aware of the use back then. I was referring only to the design of the device, and how this new one sounds a lot like the historical one.
__________________
Words of Wisdom:

If you could really get to know someone and know that they weren't lying to you, then you would know the world was real. Because you could agree on things, you could compare notes. That must be why people get married or make Art. So they'll be able to really know something and not go insane.
mystmarimatt is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 11:10 AM   #52 (permalink)
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randerolf
Is this the same thing as rigging a gun to your door to shoot trespassers? I believe that in such cases in the US, the person harmed can be sued in civil court and maybe criminal court as well.
No.

The case law I've read against booby traps states that the problem is that a) they are set and then left unattended and that there are legitimate reasons for forced entry into property (such as firemen during a fire or police with a search warrant.)

Obviously this is different.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 11:56 AM   #53 (permalink)
Fade out
 
Location: in love
Quote:
Originally Posted by onesnowyowl
Actually, they were mainly used by fathers to protect what they saw as "property". There's a reason why they're called "chastity" belts--they were meant to insure that the father's property--the daughter--remained chaste until marriage. A damaged daughter would not claim as high a bride-price as one left inviolate and pure.

True that was one of their main uses. They were also used by some husbands.

Sweetpea
__________________
Having a Pet Will Change Your Life!
Looking for a great pet?! Click Here!
"I am the Type of Person Who Can Get Away With A lot, Simply Because I Don't Ask Permission for the Privilege of Being Myself"
Sweetpea is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 11:58 AM   #54 (permalink)
Fade out
 
Location: in love
Quote:
Originally Posted by mystmarimatt
I wasn't trying to comment on the use or methodology behind the device. Please don't make assumptions about what I do or do not know, I'm fully aware of the use back then. I was referring only to the design of the device, and how this new one sounds a lot like the historical one.
thanks for clarifying. i wasn't trying to be bitchy.

Sweetpea
__________________
Having a Pet Will Change Your Life!
Looking for a great pet?! Click Here!
"I am the Type of Person Who Can Get Away With A lot, Simply Because I Don't Ask Permission for the Privilege of Being Myself"
Sweetpea is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 12:05 PM   #55 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Lets hook a homing device on this thing too. Hehe talk about a dilmema for the rapist. Tear it off ya, or get caught
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 12:06 PM   #56 (permalink)
Cunning Runt
 
Marvelous Marv's Avatar
 
Location: Taking a mulligan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
This sounds like it will find a home in the wacko religious right as well... I wonder if parents can put this in their daughter? It would prevent sex (intercourse) before marriage like little else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stare At The Sun
Howso?

Honestly, I agree that a very extreme parent might force their child to do this, granted, he said it in not so choice terms, but bigoted, no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suave
No, he qualified it by saying "wacko" and "right", meaning the fanatical groups within religion (I presume primarily Christian religion in this case).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
As others have pointed out, I did say "wacko". If you also look at my post you will see that I said "religious"... Not, Hindu, Christian, Islamist, etc... No modifier.
Nope, I'm still calling this one what it was, a bigoted statement that ridicules a group of people's religious beliefs.

The same posters I quoted above wouldn't be as forgiving if I'd posted a comment like, "This device might be very useful for protecting men in San Francisco from the loony gays there." Notice that I qualified my remark with "loony," and I didn't use a modifier.

Until you can show significant references to Hindus or Islamists as the "religious right," I will give your explanation the consideration it deserves: None.

Thanks for the post. It, and the responses were quite revealing.
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."
Margaret Thatcher
Marvelous Marv is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 12:16 PM   #57 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Would it have made you happier if I said... fundamentalist? If so, you can have a, "fundamentalist" free of charge.



The point, which you carefully sniped out of my reply, is that there are already wacko religious types who practice similar actions. Call me intolerant if you wish, but if a religion requires the chopping off little girl's labia or clitoris or sewing their vaginas shut it is just plain wrong.

Surgically implanting an anti-rape device into a young girl... equally so.


Clearly you have already made up your mind that I am a bigot. I will waste no more typing on what I've already established to be a misunderstand about the nature of the device in question.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke

Last edited by Charlatan; 09-01-2005 at 12:38 PM..
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 12:20 PM   #58 (permalink)
Twitterpated
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
Quote:
Originally Posted by guthmund
Yeah, but don't you think once the first dozen or so guys get caught like this, the rapist community will just adjust their methodology? I mean, if kids who barely made it out of high school, can memorize binders of complicated football plays then I imagine a rapist can successfully adjust his technique.

I just don't see how this is going to be very effective.
You are considering rapists in too logical a sense. Rape does not strike me as a logical crime, but an emotional or psychotic one. I'm not saying there might not be some rapists who plan this stuff out, but I'll bet most don't have a "methodology" to adjust, nor a community with which to confer.
__________________
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato
Suave is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 12:22 PM   #59 (permalink)
Twitterpated
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
No.

The case law I've read against booby traps states that the problem is that a) they are set and then left unattended and that there are legitimate reasons for forced entry into property (such as firemen during a fire or police with a search warrant.)

Obviously this is different.
What if the woman is having a vagina fire?

Marv: first off, you used a bad example. Sexual orientation is not a belief system. Your example was like saying "those loony tall people".

While your opinion in this case is as valid as any one of ours, since there are more of us, something resembling a concensus has been reached in the defendant's favour.
__________________
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato

Last edited by Suave; 09-01-2005 at 12:27 PM..
Suave is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 12:46 PM   #60 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
Nope, I'm still calling this one what it was, a bigoted statement that ridicules a group of people's religious beliefs.

The same posters I quoted above wouldn't be as forgiving if I'd posted a comment like, "This device might be very useful for protecting men in San Francisco from the loony gays there." Notice that I qualified my remark with "loony," and I didn't use a modifier.

Until you can show significant references to Hindus or Islamists as the "religious right," I will give your explanation the consideration it deserves: None.
"Religious right" pertains to those people who are both religious and conservative. The terminology itself has nothing to do with preceisely what religion that would be- therefore, any. Just because there's an established group of wackos commonly associated with that terminology doesn't mean they're the ONLY wackos to be associted with that terminology.

I'm not going to bother addressing the apples-to-oranges analogy.
analog is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 01:20 PM   #61 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog
"Religious right" pertains to those people who are both religious and conservative. The terminology itself has nothing to do with preceisely what religion that would be- therefore, any. Just because there's an established group of wackos commonly associated with that terminology doesn't mean they're the ONLY wackos to be associted with that terminology.

I'm not going to bother addressing the apples-to-oranges analogy.
Come now analog, I don't think there is any doubt what religion was ment by the statement 'religious right'.

Cleaving rabbits on this one is quite silly.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 01:28 PM   #62 (permalink)
©
 
StanT's Avatar
 
Location: Colorado
On another note, the population of South Africa is 23.5 million, of which 4.5 million are caucasion. Is anyone offended that the demonstration phallus is white? Isn't it a bit bigoted to attribute rape to a minority?
StanT is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 01:54 PM   #63 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
I hate to spoil a good story, but it appears that "chastity belts" never really existed; they are pretty much an urban myth that originated in Victorian England. A couple historians wrote books on the subject awhile back:

Quote:
Copyright 1996 Nationwide News Pty Limited
The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, Australia)

June 24, 1996, Monday

LENGTH: 174 words

HEADLINE: Chastity belts an old joke on modern times

BODY:
THE chastity belt that "unchivalrous symbol of the Crusades" never existed.

They are nothing more than Victorian myths created during the sexually repressed Victorian era.

So say two historians, whose views are shared by some of Britain's biggest museums.

"Apart from a handful of prisoners who wore them for protection against licentious warders, it is unlikely belts were anything more than a handy gag for burlesque writers," historian James Brundage was quoted in the Sunday Times newspaper as saying.

This contradiction of accepted historical wisdom is supported by several British museums which are quietly withdrawing chastity belts from display.

The British Museum has has led the way, branding as a fake a chastity belt that has been on display since 1846.

Britain's Royal Armouries also have decided to remove two belts from display.

Felicity Riddy, of the Centre for Medieval Studies at York University, said: "There is no medieval evidence, from Chaucer or anyone else.

It all points to an early urban myth."
EDIT: If anybody can point me to the modern source (probably the last 30 years) who originated the myth that fathers forced their daughters to wear chastity belts to ensure a high bride-price, I'd be very interested in seeing it.

Last edited by raveneye; 09-01-2005 at 02:04 PM..
raveneye is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 02:08 PM   #64 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Come now analog, I don't think there is any doubt what religion was ment by the statement 'religious right'.

Cleaving rabbits on this one is quite silly.
What it literally says, and what some might infer it means, are two different things when defending the use of it. *shrug* All that has to be done is the original poster saying "yes, I meant religious and conservative" and that has to be that- because the words mean exactly that. Assuming otherwise is just that, assuming.

Even though it seems like a small argument, the assertion was made that the original poster was a bigot, or being bigoted, which is by no means a light assertion to make.

Oh- and just to straighten it out for everyone... it slips in and out of the vagina... surgery is required to remove it from the penis, once it's attached. The man inserts penis, comes out with the thing attached to his dick. That's from the actual article. So now we can all stop talking about sewing vaginas shut.

Last edited by analog; 09-01-2005 at 02:16 PM..
analog is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 02:12 PM   #65 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
Just to clear the air...

I can see how you might construe "religious right" to mean "Christian religious right". It was not my intention to make that connection with my poor choice of language. I would include in "wacko religious right" all those who practice an extremely conservative form of religion. As I suggested above words such as "fundamentalist", "orthodoxy", "fringe", "extreme" would have better served. I will attempt to be more careful in my use of language in the future.

I apologize for my carelessness...

I still stand by my statement that a device that would have been surgically inserted into a vagina to prevent rape (or any sexual interference) would be a valuable object to parents who have extreme religious beliefs about the sanctity of their daughters (I believe I have sufficently detailed where I was coming from in this regard).
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke

Last edited by Charlatan; 09-01-2005 at 02:21 PM..
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:11 PM   #66 (permalink)
Oh dear God he breeded
 
Seer666's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona
I just want to know, how is she going to take it out without fuckin up her hand?
__________________
Bad spellers of the world untie!!!

I am the one you warned me of

I seem to have misplaced the bullet with your name on it, but I have a whole box addressed to occupant.
Seer666 is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 05:06 PM   #67 (permalink)
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
This Swedish concept seems like a somewhat more feasible method of protection against rape. Yet it would not protect against AIDS unless it was used in conjunction WITH a female condom.

One other thing I wonder is what the cost would be. For so many of the young women in the country who are more likely to be a victim of such rapes I have a feeling a majority of them would be on the lower income side. Also some of them are probably young enough that they are still living at home and not have access to large sums of their own.
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.
raeanna74 is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 06:06 PM   #68 (permalink)
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
That looks like what I would expect the Dentata to look like (see Redlemon's post #40).
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 11:37 PM   #69 (permalink)
Twitterpated
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
Just to clear the air...

I can see how you might construe "religious right" to mean "Christian religious right". It was not my intention to make that connection with my poor choice of language. I would include in "wacko religious right" all those who practice an extremely conservative form of religion. As I suggested above words such as "fundamentalist", "orthodoxy", "fringe", "extreme" would have better served. I will attempt to be more careful in my use of language in the future.

I apologize for my carelessness...

I still stand by my statement that a device that would have been surgically inserted into a vagina to prevent rape (or any sexual interference) would be a valuable object to parents who have extreme religious beliefs about the sanctity of their daughters (I believe I have sufficently detailed where I was coming from in this regard).
You've nothing to apologize for. Even if you had been referring specifically to right-wing Christian crazies, it's the same as speaking ill of the extremist Islamic groups that perpetrate violence. It is not bigoted to speak a certain way of persons with distinguishing behavioural characteristics that apply to the statements made about them. It is bigoted to look down upon a group/person simply because they are from that specific group. A very important, and frequently missed, detail.
__________________
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato
Suave is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:50 AM   #70 (permalink)
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
It's reactionism. The hard truth is, this just isn't practical. A woman can't precisely go around wearing this at all times and if she's not wearing it she's vulnerable. Aside from that, it's simply not going to stop these crimes in their tracks. What leads to a device like this is a desire to do something, anything to prevent these atrocities from happening.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just that I don't think it's going to make any changes.

In terms of the mechanics, my understanding is that the device 'latches on' when the man loses his erection, which will happen quite quickly. At that point the barbs have embedded themselves deeply enough that surgical removal is the only method possible, which requires a hospital visit and will lead to apprehension. I suppose it's probably possible to do it yourself, but I don't think I'd be wanting to dig around in my dick with a knife to try to get a bunch of barbs out.

Unfortunately there is no easy answer to the problem, nor is there a 'magic bullet'. This device makes the inventor and the people who read about it feel better and may lead to arrests in a few cases, but that's probably going to be the extent of it. I would love more than anything to be proven wrong here.

The only other issue I really have about it is that it doesn't prevent the crime, as it requires penetration to be effective. If one could devise a method to protect a woman prior to penetration, that would be the better option. The best thing that could be done would be to educate the women in high risk areas on how to protect themselves and offer enough protection and civil defense (ie police) to effectively patrol the dangerous sections of the country. Stiffer punishments would also help, although it's important not to use anything inhumane. If we inflict a cruel punishment on a person, even for a crime of this magnitude, we're really no better than they are. Unfortunately none of this really seems feasible at the moment either.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
 

Tags
africa, aims, antirape, attacks, condom, south, stop

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360