03-17-2004, 08:04 AM | #42 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Pats country
|
Quote:
To me psychology is a science because it endeavours to be a science. While some sciences such as Math can absolutely say the 2+2=4, is it a bit of a fallacious argument to compare that with psychology because in math such as this you are essentially working with a Population and not a sample, and you have also removed all variables. Psychology would be a pure science too if it were able to measure POPULATIONS; instead it must take bits of data in samples of 1067 and attempt to use them to generalize in a meaningful way. You cannot focus on the fact that they are often wrong; chemistry experiments do not always work as planned for unseen reasons too. So to tie back to my original point, science is in a constant state of flux, psychology attempts to use the most advanced and scientific methods at its disposal to generalize and treat a great many disorders. It's not perfect and never will be, but it is always STRIVING to make bigger leaps forward.
__________________
"Religion is the one area of our discourse in which it is considered noble to pretend to be certain about things no human being could possibly be certain about" --Sam Harris |
|
03-17-2004, 11:46 PM | #43 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Right here
|
Quote:
/smooth sneaks off to finish his methods and stats finals |
|
03-20-2004, 10:51 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Crazy
Location: SoCal
|
I think maybe you're asking the wrong question. Psychology is a science by definition. It is the study of behavior and mental processes. But that doesn't mean that everyone who "contributes" to the field is a scientist. There are a lot of bogus things being called psychology, and there are a lot of conclusions being drawn that are based on unscientific studies.
But we've certainly learned quite a bit of useful stuff about the way the human mind works, and that's what psychology is all about. |
03-21-2004, 06:32 AM | #46 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: Hiding from the penguins they come to take my sanity away!
|
hey i agree with Podmore. we have more quacks than many other sciences and it give all psychologist bad names.
__________________
"enjoy life to the brim but do not spill it" quoted off my tatoo "Iam myself every day." |
03-21-2004, 07:39 AM | #47 (permalink) |
Nothing
|
'new', less well defined areas of research are always infested with quacks.
Though, on the subject of quackery, I believe dentists were considered quacks in the 19th century... Whats that got to do with anything? *shrugs* I dunno.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}-- |
Tags |
psychology, science |
|
|