10-10-2003, 09:50 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Turn off your TV.
Location: ... .- -. ..-. .-. .- -. -.-. .. ... -.-. --- --..-- -.-. .-
|
Additionally, tights can be worn as acceptable everyday outside clothing while pantyhose would probably be considered public indecency/walking around in your underwear.
__________________
"inhuman fiery goat worship" is an anagram for "information superhighway" -kingvolc |
10-11-2003, 04:05 AM | #5 (permalink) |
strangelove
Location: ...more here than there...
|
tights have a thicker/denser knit and possibly thicker 'yarn'.
afaik, that's really the difference.
__________________
- + - ° GiRLie GeeK ° - + - ° 01110010011011110110111101110100001000000110110101100101 Therell be days/When Ill stray/I may appear to be/Constantly out of reach/I give in to sin/Because I like to practise what I preach
|
10-11-2003, 05:16 AM | #6 (permalink) | |
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
Location: Upper Michigan
|
Quote:
Also I don't think I've seen any "nude" see through Tights. Pantyhose tend to be less opaque than Tights and the color isn't usually tan or skin colors.
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama My Karma just ran over your Dogma. |
|
10-12-2003, 06:06 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
I was going to say pretty much what Raeanna said. Tights are opaque or very near to opaque, whereas pantyhose/nylons are transluscent.
__________________
Our doubts are traitors, And make us lose the good we oft might win By fearing to attempt. |
Tags |
ladies, question |
|
|