Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   CD Prices to drop up to $6 (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/25584-cd-prices-drop-up-6-a.html)

tj2001cobra 09-04-2003 05:32 AM

CD Prices to drop up to $6
 
Article can be found here: http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/...cdprices_x.htm

NEW YORK — In a move that could lower music CD prices across the board, Universal Music Group (UMG), the world's largest music company, will cut the suggested retail price for its top-line CDs to $12.98 from the current $16.98 to $18.98, effective Sept. 29.
The cut by the company, which has contracts with artists such as Eminem, 50 Cent, Mary J. Blige and Shania Twain, is an effort to revive sales, which have dropped 30% industrywide over the past three years. U.S. sales in 2002 dropped 8% to $12.6 billion, according to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).

"We expect this will invigorate the music market in North America," said Doug Morris, UMG chairman and CEO. "This will allow retailers (to sell) for $10 or less if they so choose."

The wholesale price on most CDs will drop to $9.09 from $12.02, with some top artists, such as Eminem, at $10.10. UMG expects retailers, who set final prices, to start selling CDs for about $12 on Oct. 1 and hopes they will go as low as $10.

"We've tracked this carefully. There's no question: The consumer responds when we get to that sweet spot of $11 to $12 per CD," says Jim Urie, president of Universal Music & Video Distribution. Executives at the other four major music companies — Warner, EMI, BMG and Sony — declined to comment.

In addition to the price cuts, UMG will replace ad subsidies for retailers with more ads for its own products to lure music fans back into stores. The company also is cutting the suggested retail for cassettes to $8.98.

The price cuts are also the music industry's latest attempt to slow illegal file sharing by consumers. The RIAA has served more than 1,300 subpoenas to identify traders and expects to file lawsuits as early as this week. Record companies are losing $700 million a year to piracy, says Josh Bernoff, media and entertainment analyst at Forrester Research.

Forrester released a study Tuesday predicting an even bigger drop in CD sales as Internet music file-sharing keeps gaining ground on the flagging CD, CNN.com said.

"It's disgraceful that people are losing their jobs and stores are closing," Morris says. "As the leader in the industry, we feel we should pave the way with a plan that, if it's successful, will become permanent."

It remains to be seen whether the cuts will be enough to persuade young consumers to buy CDs. Discounters such as Wal-Mart already discount CDs to about $13.

Michael Goodman, an analyst with Yankee Group, warned that if retailers refuse to pass on their full savings to consumers, "They could exacerbate a bad situation."

And Bernoff warns that lowering prices will not solve the long-term problem of file sharing: "This price reduction may stem the tide of losses in the short term. But in the long run, the only solution is to provide music online for people who want music online. That's the future, not CDs."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Excellent. It's about time....

troit 09-04-2003 05:35 AM

Works for me.... although I rarely buy a CD anymore. Its just too easy to d/l new music.

Thraeryn 09-04-2003 05:44 AM

If CDs cost that little, Jinya and I would be at Best Buy daily. We always browse the cheapy rack when we're there, and that would bring most CDs from that company into cheapy range.

GO OUT AND BUY CDs from UMG to prove that this policy works. :p

Ganguro 09-04-2003 06:10 AM

The plan sounds good, if this price drop applied to import CD's as well i'd have a box full of new CD's by Xmas.. Yes troit it is easy to download new music, but you do realize.. it's stealing right? It's just as easy to go to a store and listen at a listening station to a new cd first, then buy it... or even go to amazon or someplace online and listen to song samples then purchase it. File sharing is popular because it appeals to people's nature to get something for nothing with minimal effort. Still doesnt mean it's ok to take something for free, just because you can.

legolas 09-04-2003 06:33 AM

I'm sorry but that still doesn't beat free music.

absorbentishe 09-04-2003 06:34 AM

Truthfully, if they dropped the price even more, they would sell a whole lot more. If and when they do, I'll definately be buying more disks.

Cynthetiq 09-04-2003 07:05 AM

hmmph... when the movie costs US$19.99 and the soundtrack costs almost the same and there's no picture... people figure something is up.

bah.... i still have to see my money from the CD class action suit

Blistex 09-04-2003 07:16 AM

When are they gonna realize that people are too lazy to drive to best buy or Wall Mart, and that they want to have new music now! In their homes.

RIAA had their chance to jump on the MP3 bandwagon a long time ago.

If they just had a site that charges people 50 cents a song or something they would be rolling in cash. They could have embraced Napster and Kazaa but instead they decided to fight them which was a huge mistake.

Now they think that sueing people is the way to do it.

God of Thunder 09-04-2003 07:35 AM

The music industry: The public will probably buy more CDs if we lower the price.

The buying public: DUHHHHHHHHH!!! Ya think?!?!?!?:lol:

MSD 09-04-2003 08:02 AM

Now if they would just give a fair amount to the artists who make the music, I'd be satisfied. I hope that they don't take much out of the miniscule amount that they give artists for each CD sale.

This is a great step in the right direction. I'll start buying CD's again.

rmarshall 09-04-2003 08:12 AM

My CD player in my car only plays CDs. I have converted all my music to MP3s for the boat and the house, but the original CDs end up in the car.

So, I still buy CDs. I like the way they come complete and in sequence and the little album covers show up in the media player after they are converted to MP3s.

Cheap CDs are good.

slant eyes 09-04-2003 08:17 AM

hell, if they were cheap. i would buy them too. the silver stamped cd's are way better than burnt ones, tho i would still burn a copy for the car, leaving the original at home.

baaa 09-04-2003 08:20 AM

that makes me happy

a2k 09-04-2003 08:54 AM

Still not cheap enough. They've got to drop below the $10 mark to have a psychological affect.

tinfoil 09-04-2003 08:56 AM

I am pleased. I only hope they are not cutting into the already ridiculously low royalties paid out to the artist.

Conclamo Ludus 09-04-2003 08:58 AM

Good! Its about time. I still purchase CD's and always will. But I don't like being punished with their prices.

Memalvada 09-04-2003 10:31 AM

They should have done this a long time ago...

Still think it could be cheaper though....

glasscutter43 09-04-2003 10:48 AM

Ummm.... blank discs are still way cheaper

battlemouth 09-04-2003 10:49 AM

personally i would rather own the cd than download, the only reason i dont is because of price so with this new policy maybe i can start purchasing cds yet again. oh boy!!

World's King 09-04-2003 10:50 AM

Well, that's gonna kill the downloading buisness.

smooth 09-04-2003 02:01 PM

Where are the $6 CDs--I feel cheated?

dannoxxxx 09-04-2003 02:01 PM

yeah, i would buy more CDs if they were cheaper, obviously.

Thanks for the article.

I read the post on how many songs some people have downloaded......WOW!

Kaos 09-04-2003 02:55 PM

So is this going to affect the cost of CD's in Canada? Lowest price I've seen in years is maybe 15.99-16.99 for the new releases.

If the CD isn't a new release or the band doesn't have widespread popularity, I can expect the cost of the CD to be anywhere from 19.99 up to 27.99!!!

Speed_Gibson 09-04-2003 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by legolas
I'm sorry but that still doesn't beat free music.
I must disagree - some people that are anal-retentitive about audio quality tend to avoid the MP3 codec for the lossy formats (yes, that includes me) and prefer files encoded in Ogg-Vorbis -q5/6 or Musepack on the standard or insane setting.

I personally only use lossless codecs - normally Flac now, but still have many GBs of ape files - to encode music that will be archived here. And I always prefer having a clean copy of the master material rather than a frequently shitty encoding job done in a low bitrate (anything below 192 bitrate in my book, or damn near any CBR MP3 file) or done through an atrocity like Xing software.

tinfoil 09-05-2003 06:53 AM

An update for my fellow Canucks:

Quote:

Randy Lennox, CEO of UMC, says that the consumer has spoken and Univeral Music Canada has listened. '(The music) has been fairly high-priced and therefore, they have been feeling fairly guilt-free about procuring music for free.'

The cuts are in line with Universal Music in the US. Roughly 30% will be cut from the MSRP, with top-line CDs being $14.98 and $9.99 for new artists.

UMC also plans to launch an online service in Canada. Individual tracks will be $0.99 and complete discs $9.99. No word as to system requirements or DRM protection.

bigjule 09-05-2003 07:12 AM

I dont know about other areas of the country but here in Wisconsin, behind the Cheddar Curtain I can buy just about any CD I want for under $14 with alot of the new realeases being available under$11 for the first week of release. i hope this price drop will get my everyday prices under $10,

Psivage 09-05-2003 07:15 AM

I hope they just don't reduce the number of songs on the CDs now.

Mikado 09-05-2003 07:43 AM

Why doesn't the record association sell cds in MP3 format? I mean now days most people have some form of MP3 player. Hell most DVD players will play MP3's. Plus your PC will always play MP3's. By selling discs with MP3's they could give the consumer more songs with each disc, maybe even combining similar artists on one disc. I don't think people would be so hesitant to drop $15 or $20 on a CD if it had 25-30 songs instead of 10-15.

tinfoil 09-05-2003 07:51 AM

Because MP3 quality is a step backwards.

santafe5000 09-05-2003 08:00 AM

Me, i wait til they are in the bargain bin.

Lestat 09-05-2003 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Psivage
I hope they just don't reduce the number of songs on the CDs now.
I could see this happening.

bermuDa 09-05-2003 10:17 AM

that's awesome!!!!!





but i'm still not buying shit from the RIAA

krwlz 09-05-2003 10:28 AM

I like to have albums. An album tends to be a "statement" or "era" of a band. Its nice to hear a certin sound all the way through the cd. Plus, I like having the jackets. In the end, I never download for those reasons, aswell as the fact that p2p networks give hackers a wicked easy backdoor into your computer. I cant tell you how many people I kno who have had their computer fucked up by a virus on Kazzaa

MacGnG 09-05-2003 12:33 PM

wonder y it took so long?! doesnt matter music cds should be 5$ and cd roms and other video games should be 15$.

DelayedReaction 09-05-2003 12:47 PM

I enjoy having the albums as well. $10 is still a bit much, but far better than what they were charging previously. I'll have to see what artists this company produces, and decide if any of them are worth buying.

fallen_angel 09-05-2003 03:08 PM

sweet, in my opinion more people wouldnt mind buying cds if they werent so damn expensive. i know i would cuz it would save me time but then again you couldnt make mixed tapes either so i guess it might work and it might not but its worth a shot and getting 6 or 12 bucks is alot better than not gettin the 18 or 20 . at least they makin some money

mydragonfido 09-05-2003 03:48 PM

Still not cheap enough for me!!! Free is cheap enough for me!!!

Esoteric 09-05-2003 07:19 PM

I'll definately buy now, $17+ for a CD that has about 4 good songs is just stupid in my opinion. $6 isn't that much of a setback. :P

Johnny Rotten 09-05-2003 07:39 PM

I have to laugh. They're cutting the MSRP, so the retailer takes the hit while the label goes on like usual.

And at the same time, Morris is concerned about retail employees getting fired and stores closing. How the heck will this help? They'll get more sales--but make the same amount of money.

Guess who benefits, besides the consumer.

This boosts label profits without any additional work and doesn't do anything about the declining retail music industry. Brilliantly misrepresented by the label.

jeenyus_one 09-06-2003 07:50 AM

thats STILL too expensive for me. Whats the point in buying CS's when you got things like Kazaa and a burner? What a shitty little cover? FUCK ThAT!

I think I'll stick to my ways.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360