Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Is Scientology A Religion or Cult??? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/114567-scientology-religion-cult.html)

DaveOrion 03-17-2007 02:33 PM

..
 
..

Jinn 03-17-2007 02:54 PM

If you're an atheist, they're all "crazy," and all cults, religions, or just belief groups, depending on how you define the term.

Christianity is just as much a "cult" as Scientology, to me, but I find very little meaning in the words themselves.

politicophile 03-17-2007 03:00 PM

two characters

genuinegirly 03-17-2007 03:28 PM

It's a business.

Charlatan 03-17-2007 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by genuinegirly
It's a business.

Most organized religions are run like a "business".

I tend to ascribe the idea that cults are just a "religion" that isn't mainstream. Given the popularity and spread of Scientology I'd say it's inching towards legitimacy.

FoolThemAll 03-17-2007 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by politicophile
So, it looks like one of two things is true: either cult and religion mean the same thing, or cults are just religions we don't like.

I've always taken cult to mean an extreme kind of religion, marked by stuff like massive insulation from the nonbelieving world and a reverence for church leader(s) as though they were infallible or close to it. Perhaps 'cult' could be the name for the extreme end of a continuum; a religion's closer to being a cult as it acquires more authoritarian, xenophobic, and brainwashing characteristics.

So by that distinction, I'd say that your average Catholic church has a few cultish tendencies but not many, Scientology a few more, certain fundy groups a few more still, and then ranking highest up in kool-aid units per follower would be groups like Heaven's Gate. Definitely a lot of room for debate here, and I could be a bit off on those estimates, but I think there's some significant differences between your local unitarian religious group and the Children of God cult.

Willravel 03-17-2007 05:16 PM

Scientology is science fiction manufactured into a scam. It's neither religion or cult. At least most other religions are based in fantasy instead of science fiction. Speaking of which, why do they always play fantasy on the Sci Fi channel?

Ourcrazymodern? 03-17-2007 06:59 PM

Nah, it's a cult, and therefore became a religion for some people.
Science fiction has always been fantasy, except where it's been realized.

:eek: you don't want fantasies making sense, after all:thumbsup:

Dilbert1234567 03-17-2007 07:37 PM

the difference between a cult and a religion is attendance.

Charlatan 03-18-2007 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
Scientology is science fiction manufactured into a scam. It's neither religion or cult. At least most other religions are based in fantasy instead of science fiction. Speaking of which, why do they always play fantasy on the Sci Fi channel?

Here's a thought... Paul took the Cult of Christ, a Jewish cult, and made it palatable to Gentiles at large. He spent the rest of his life profiting from his efforts. His letters are, after, instructions to his followers on how to best carry on and spread the Good News.

Mohammed's cult isn't all that far removed.

Catholicism was a Big money maker at it height. Big.

How will people view Scientology in a couple Millenia? Who will be the Martin Luther of Scientology?

DaveOrion 03-18-2007 10:11 AM

..

Ourcrazymodern? 03-18-2007 10:33 AM

We don't want our fantasies making sense, after all.

politicophile 03-18-2007 10:35 AM

two characters

Willravel 03-18-2007 10:44 AM

The difference is the same as the difference between The Lord of the Rings and Starwars. One is fantasy, one is science fiction.

Carno 03-18-2007 11:23 AM

This thread inspired me to re-watch that South Park episode about Scientology.

That is one hilarious fucking episode.

Willravel 03-18-2007 11:29 AM

...And people deny there being a distinct anti-Scientologist air to TFP.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :D :D

DaveOrion 03-18-2007 01:00 PM

..

Charlatan 03-18-2007 02:56 PM

You are right about parts of the Bible being "historical". It is firm belief, by many, that the first five books of the OT are historical that is fantasy. It is the loaves and fishes, raising the dead and resurrection that are difficult to believe.

Time and a concerted effort to indoctrinate (sorry, evangelize) has led to large numbers of humanity believing the stories of the Bible to be real (maybe not all stories but many of them).

My question is, given enough time and enough effort, what will humanity think of a cult like Scientology in two millenia?

DaveOrion 03-18-2007 03:25 PM

..

Cheeky Squirrel 03-18-2007 03:30 PM

L Ron once said if you really wanted to make money you should start up a religion.

Then he started a religion... and made a load of money... started believing his own lies... when mad with power... thought the CIA and the IRS were out to get him and set sea on a big boat forever so that they couldn't get him.

To advance in scientology you have to buy the deeper secrets. As these secrets are revealed its like bad science fiction from a bad science fiction novelist. Aliens n stuff. Its a lot like a pyramid scheme except its religious secrets you sell not goods.

Is a con truly a religion? Is it simply a matter of scale?

Ourcrazymodern? 03-18-2007 03:45 PM

Hubbard probably loved everyone.
It's like a function... .

Rekna 03-18-2007 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan
Here's a thought... Paul took the Cult of Christ, a Jewish cult, and made it palatable to Gentiles at large. He spent the rest of his life profiting from his efforts.

I wouldn't say he profited from it unless being arrested, beaten, thrown in prison, and executed is profiting.

DaveOrion 03-18-2007 09:33 PM

..

Menoman 03-20-2007 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
...And people deny there being a distinct anti-Scientologist air to TFP.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :D :D

=)

Redjake 03-20-2007 03:49 AM

Definitely a religion. A very unique religion, but a religion nonetheless.

flstf 03-20-2007 04:51 AM

What is a religion and what is a cult depends on your point of view.
I am torn between the two premises:

Most religions are fantasy.
Most religions have a grain of truth in them.

To me Scientology seems to fit more the first premise but I'll try and keep an open mind.

archetypal fool 03-20-2007 05:43 AM

I believe that Scientology is a religion based mostly on making money , but in the general audience it's considered a cult for many reasons. Everyone knows that you have to spend lots of money to become a Scientologist and I find it suspect that someone has to pay to raise in rank in a religion.

There's also a general light of distrust. Something about Scientology doesn't sound right to most people. Here's my personal experience:

I live very near the Scientology world capital (Clearwater, Florida) and I once had to perform there at THE Scientology hotel for a wedding (with my quartet). Everyone walks around in a long sleeve white shirt and tie and black slacks...

The hotel has security everywhere and we couldn't even get into the hotel without the bride-to-be coming outside to convince the security that we were supposed to be there. It was all very surreal and we didn't feel comfortable at all.
________________________

The way I see it, if I become a Christian, I buy a Bible and donate a couple bucks at church on Sundays. If I become a Scientologist, I spend hundreds in books and videos, and I have to actively attempt to rise in rank by doing so. For these reasons I place Scientology at the bottom of list of religions I respect.

Ourcrazymodern? 03-20-2007 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flstf
What is a religion and what is a cult depends on your point of view.
I am torn between the two premises:

Most religions are fantasy.
Most religions have a grain of truth in them.

.

Many fantasies have a grain of truth in them. If scientology has a truckload, does that make it any less fantastic? (w/o the positive connotations of the adjective)

:shakehead:

Bill O'Rights 03-20-2007 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by willravel
...And people deny there being a distinct anti-Scientologist air to TFP.

Indeed.

Why is it, I wonder, that some "religions" seem to be fair game...while others are decidedly off limits? Sacred cows, as it were.
Most, I suspect, find Scientology much to fantastical to be taken seriously, much less believed. Yet...there are those of us that find...well, shall we just say more "mainstream" religions, to be fantastical as well. Yet the non-believers, of the mainstream religions are criticized for being intollerent. And, to a certain degree, I suppose that we are.

There are enough believers and non-believers here to provide for some interesting and fair, if not sometimes heated, discussion and debate. I think, however, that were I a Scientologist, I would most definately be keeping my head down. Much as I did as an atheist, not so very long ago.

What I'm trying to say here is that don't you find it extremely hypocritical to accuse others of being intollerent of your own beliefs, while pointing fingers and laughing at anothers? No matter how assinine those beliefs may seem.

Glass houses, much?

flstf 03-20-2007 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ourcrazymodern?
Many fantasies have a grain of truth in them. If scientology has a truckload, does that make it any less fantastic? (w/o the positive connotations of the adjective)

:shakehead:

I believe our species has an inherent need to develop and sometimes believe in reasons for (our) existence. Being undecided does not sit well with the majority of us. Scientology just seems to be harder to accept than most but that is probably because I am used to the stories behind many of the other major religions.

Ourcrazymodern? 03-20-2007 11:59 AM

Undecided existence hasn't bothered me a bit. What bothers me is that we seem to need to imagine things outside what we can perceive. Even given that nature writes its most beautiful poems for the microscope and the telescope (yeah, ...) and that many of us have looked through neither, we feel an inherent need to imagine what we cannot imagine? Scientology at least acknowledges that it was made up relatively recently.

Ol' Man Mose 03-20-2007 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Indeed.

Why is it, I wonder, that some "religions" seem to be fair game...while others are decidedly off limits? Sacred cows, as it were.
Most, I suspect, find Scientology much to fantastical to be taken seriously, much less believed. Yet...there are those of us that find...well, shall we just say more "mainstream" religions, to be fantastical as well. Yet the non-believers, of the mainstream religions are criticized for being intollerent. And, to a certain degree, I suppose that we are.

There are enough believers and non-believers here to provide for some interesting and fair, if not sometimes heated, discussion and debate. I think, however, that were I a Scientologist, I would most definately be keeping my head down. Much as I did as an atheist, not so very long ago.

What I'm trying to say here is that don't you find it extremely hypocritical to accuse others of being intollerent of your own beliefs, while pointing fingers and laughing at anothers? No matter how assinine those beliefs may seem.

Glass houses, much?


You mean like Muslims are maniacal suicide bombers but Christians aren't because they don't die with their bombs??

Scientologists are no more loopy than the self-delusional dupes who believe “millions” of presumably thoroughly mongrelized Egypto-Hebrews couldn’t navigate across the Negev Desert, (not much bigger than Connecticut) even though their God provided a fiery navigational aid for them to follow! :crazy:

Some Eagle Scout Moses turned out to be! :rolleyes:

Ourcrazymodern? 03-20-2007 03:14 PM

(To be a suicide bomber you must die with your bomb)

Will no one stand up for Scientology?

Eeeraq 03-20-2007 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
the difference between a cult and a religion is attendance.

I believe this to ring the most true. Cults are religions that not that many people "follow" and religions are simply cults that have grown large enough to get people to finally say, alright, you're valid...

so I think the question in itself is a rather pointless one...

According to the government (of the US), to qualify for tax exempt status and be recognized as a church you have to give most of your money back to the public, or put it towards the advancement of science, religion, education, etc.

http://www.irs.gov/charities/churches/index.html

So I guess my main question is, being as all these self enrichment classes you take from the scientologists, which cost unbelievably large sums of money, are obviously generating an assload of revenue for the church of scientology, what are they doing with it to be recognized as a church and be tax exempt? well, check this out...

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Cowen/essays/nytimes.html

a crock, if you ask me. These bullshit strong-arm tactics that major corporations use in pissing matches with the government, (while having mixed emotions on the whole deal, being as I love to see the Gov take one, but I hate seeing fake arsed religions get any of my money) generally really piss me off. I can tell I'm not the only one:

http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/stopscientology

but, being as the church and the gov are all buddy buddy now, I think I'll just go have a beer, or 10.

Ol' Man Mose 03-20-2007 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ourcrazymodern?
(To be a suicide bomber you must die with your bomb)

Will no one stand up for Scientology?

Where is Greenpeace when they are needed? Save the Suicide Bomber - buy Muslim Minute Men some sophisticated armaments! :sad:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
Indeed.

Why is it, I wonder, that some "religions" seem to be fair game...while others are decidedly off limits? Sacred cows, as it were.
Most, I suspect, find Scientology much to fantastical to be taken seriously, much less believed. Yet...there are those of us that find...well, shall we just say more "mainstream" religions, to be fantastical as well. Yet the non-believers, of the mainstream religions are criticized for being intollerent. And, to a certain degree, I suppose that we are.

There are enough believers and non-believers here to provide for some interesting and fair, if not sometimes heated, discussion and debate. I think, however, that were I a Scientologist, I would most definately be keeping my head down. Much as I did as an atheist, not so very long ago.

What I'm trying to say here is that don't you find it extremely hypocritical to accuse others of being intollerent of your own beliefs, while pointing fingers and laughing at anothers? No matter how assinine those beliefs may seem.

Glass houses, much?


G'day Bill. Are adherents of Biblical religions required to post commonsense corroborating evidence with their incredible claims made on TFP?

In the interest of an equal playing field, I’d certainly hope so.

I for one am fucking infuriated when they claim, with nothing but their Bible as substantiation,” that evil folk like me are going to burn forever, because my genuine belief - in a genial German Shepherd-headed Anubis in the sky - differs from their demonstrably bizarre beliefs. :expressionless:

foxvalleydood 03-21-2007 12:40 PM

Just to throw something out there... how different are Mormons from Scientology...? Now, on a side note, I've read most of Hubbard's sci-fi books - actually I didn't mind them - but the funny thing is I never once signed up for anything related to Scientology but for the longest time (and periodically still) I receive Scientology related propaganda in the mail. It's like they've got me pegged by the ISBN numbers via the bookstores or something. heh. Anyway, Scientology smells a lot like his science fiction novels and the cult like mystery reminds me of Nazism... I put two and two together and I say it was crafted out of Hubbard's mind... probably as a joke that went too far, knowing human nature. Hah! I think you only need 20 people to form a religion anyway. I'm thinking of starting one but I haven't written my sci-fi book yet. Zing! Okay, I'll stop now. I guess it's like Amway but Amway doesn't give back so they don't qualify as a religion.

So, that's my two cents, anyone know where I can get one of those rocket equipped DC8s? I told my new email buddy that'd I'd give him a ride back in time if he quits spamming everyone. Meh, everyone's so needy.

Ourcrazymodern? 03-21-2007 07:13 PM

Lo and behold!

Longstanding, attendance, definition, financial backing? It seems to make no difference, overall.

I admire the civitas dei, but people built them. Can anybody direct me to the nearest house of scientology? (Another rhetorical question as they're in the phone book!)

MSD 03-22-2007 07:41 PM

Scientology is a dangerous cult that brainwashes its members and abuses them, sometimes to the point of death, and has polices allowing enemies of the church to be killed without repercussions. An individual's rank within the church is determined by how much money they have paid for church services and the highest level can be reached with a total expenditure of just over $360,000. There is nothing about the Church of Scientology that can be considered respectable or harmless, it is a dangerous organization.

Just for fun,

Scientology: The evil galactic lord Xenu gathered up the overpopulation of the galaxy with the help of psychiatrists by calling them in for a tax inspection. They are paralyzed with an injection of glycerin and alcohol and flown to Teegeack (earth) where they are placed around the bases of volcanoes in what is now Hawaii and the volcanoes are detonated with atomic weapons. For his crimes, Xenu is put in a mountain prison inside a force field powered by a battery that will never run out of power.


Fantastic Four issue 158: (short version) Xemu, the evil overlord of the Fifth Dimension, commits mass murder against his subjects and is eventually imprisoned in force field inside a mountain to prevent his escape.
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/2058/xemujl7.jpg

Ourcrazymodern? 03-22-2007 08:33 PM

"killed without repercussions"? Damnit, somebody's knocking at the door and I don't have $360,000! What am I gonna do?

Ol' Man Mose 03-22-2007 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
Scientology is a dangerous cult that brainwashes its members and abuses them, sometimes to the point of death, and has polices allowing enemies of the church to be killed without repercussions. An individual's rank within the church is determined by how much money they have paid for church services and the highest level can be reached with a total expenditure of just over $360,000. There is nothing about the Church of Scientology that can be considered respectable or harmless, it is a dangerous organization.

Just for fun,

Scientology: The evil galactic lord Xenu gathered up the overpopulation of the galaxy with the help of psychiatrists by calling them in for a tax inspection. They are paralyzed with an injection of glycerin and alcohol and flown to Teegeack (earth) where they are placed around the bases of volcanoes in what is now Hawaii and the volcanoes are detonated with atomic weapons. For his crimes, Xenu is put in a mountain prison inside a force field powered by a battery that will never run out of power.


Fantastic Four issue 158: (short version) Xemu, the evil overlord of the Fifth Dimension, commits mass murder against his subjects and is eventually imprisoned in force field inside a mountain to prevent his escape.
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/2058/xemujl7.jpg

Hubbard based his pseudo-religion on a fucking comic book.



Quote:

Scientology is a dangerous cult that brainwashes its members and abuses them, sometimes to the point of death, and has polices allowing enemies of the church to be killed without repercussions. An individual's rank within the church is determined by how much money they have paid for church services and the highest level can be reached with a total expenditure of just over $360,000. There is nothing about the Church of Scientology that can be considered respectable or harmless, it is a dangerous organization.
Exactly the same could be said about Christianity and it's two cousin cults. :crazy:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360