Quote:
Originally posted by Pacifier
So why was this report "covered up by US defense chiefs for four months"? Because it doesn't fit the common republican believes and it looks bad if "you own" people correct you?
|
Or perhaps because war sounds preferable over "wussy environmental protection"?
The current administration does seem focussed on the military side of issues.
On the other hand: I think the report and possible scenario's are a bit far-fetched (regarding time-line mostly)
edited to add the quote I was replying to