|
Yes. One can hope that this may initiate an actual review of what exactly constitutes socially responsible practice. As you know, I believe media conglomerates such as the one(s) in question are so far from operating in socially conscionable ways that it would need to be a sweeping and near-revolutionary internal review. As a result, they will need to respond to the external feedback they are getting from the populations they so expertly exploit.
That's what's happening now and it is a good thing so far. The fact that their responses are clumsy and transparent only demonstrates they are just now beginning to get a clue that they have inadvertently been brainwashing themselves to believe they're somehow not responsible for the results of their actions.
__________________
create evolution
|