|
Your conclusion that you are god is Valid (based on that if your premises are true your conclusion follows), but your statement is unsound because you in fact do not have omnipotent powers and you are not omniscient.
If we follow your logic we can prove anything.
Anything that can fly is a bird
Dogs can fly
therefore
Dogs are birds
Same structure as your argument. If you assume my rediclious premises to be true the conclusion follows. But, Like yours the premises are not true and we cannot make a real conclusion based on these false premises.
__________________
I'd rather be rich than stupid.
|