Quote:
Originally posted by SLM3
You've proved my point. Targeting civilians for the sake of targeting civilians? If we think like that then what is there to discuss? What are the political causes/implications of the act? What are the root factors behind it? When you say killing for the sake of killing, you rule out any sort of discussion, and that's the kind of closed-mindedness that has led the way these past few years. No group is targeting civilians for the sake of targeting civlians. Your definition of terrorism is useless. We should really refer to it as political violence.
SLM3
|
Exactly. The terrorised have mastered the art of victimizing themselves while pointing out the culprits who are most likely their sworn enemy.
Its a destructive cycle.