I'm more upset about the fact they've chosen a co-mvp then who they chose.
If you're going to choose a "most valuable player" then choose one. ONE! One of them had to be better than the other. They both couldn't simply be the two most valuable players in the game.
Choosing co-anything (especially in sports where #1 reigns supreme) is a wishy-washy way of saying we didn't have the sack big enough to make a command decision and actually choose.
Manning had a good year; McNair had a good year; one of them had to be better at something than the other.
Same rant applies to this co-champion thing in the BCS. They put themselves in position to make this decision then grow a pair and make the damn thing.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
|