Quote:
Originally posted by Endymon32
This reminds me of that 80's Ratt hit....
To fund welfare, you must take money away from people. Then you give that stolen money to people that did nothing to contribute to society. So you are rewarded for your hard work by paying for those that dont work hard.
THe people that dont work, dont need to work, and therefore have no incentive to work. This keeps a perment class of of people dependant on welfare, and the average joe is screwed out of their own fruit of their labor.
There are plenty of people that can not work. They need to be taken care off, but there are far more that can work that don't. To force one person to pay for another that does not work but is able to, is harmful.
|
I said ECONOMIC differences, not social, please explain the economic differences and quit question dodging. I was under the impression that from a GDP perspective, which I believe you have advocated in the past, no difference exists.
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.
Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."
|