Also, the logic is simply incorrect. Bush won the majority of
correctly marked ballots, which are all that can be fairly counted. Any ballot which has more than one vote is automatically discounted and thrown away -- as it should be. You cannot suggest that Gore won, simply because incorrectly marked ballots happened to have votes for him more often.
This brings up another interesting point. There was a 3:1 ratio of incorrectly marked ballots for Gore than Bush. Does this mean that those Democrats were just too stupid to understand how to fill out a simple ballot, or maybe the ballot itself was racist?
