Quote:
|
- God is as complex as the world. If the complexity of god can exist without purpose then it is equally possible that the complexity of the world can exists without its own purpose.
|
I don't like that argument. Isn't it possible, nay likely, God is MORE complex than the world? And from that excess of complexity, may come the ability to be self-purposeful.
Quote:
|
- If creation did happen from an outside non-purpose bound entity. The entity does not need to be a deity. It could simply be some other phenomenon.
|
But wouldn't such an entity seem like a deity to us causality-bound beings?
Quote:
|
If everything is One then purpose is a flawed concept.
|
Explain this reasoning please?
Quote:
|
There is no need for god if infinity is introduced to the world. Such a concept can be conceived as a an infinite chain of purpose or circular infinity where: X because of Z because of Y because of X. In such a case there would be no need for G as there would never be an end to the chain of purpose.
|
X implies Y implies Z implies X is the format for a the following are equivalent proof. All that this means is that they all hold the same truth value, it doesn't say ANYTHING about causality. Also, there are kinds of infinity which do not encompass everything. For example, the interval (0,1) is infinitely big. In fact, its uncoutably big. And yet, I think we can all see it hardly encompasses everything involved with numbers.