Quote:
And the construct I would suggest would be what are the benefits -- what are the advantages and disadvantages of not acting? And of course, the advantage of not acting against the moon would be that no one could say that you acted; they would say, "Isn't that good, you didn't do anything against the moon." The other side of the coin, of not acting against the moon in the event that the moon posed a serious threat, would be that you'd then suffered a serious loss and you're sorry after that's over.
|
I think it's obvious that the moon is the next real threat. I mean what better place to harbor terrorists and stockpile weapons of mass destruction. We haven't been there in a while so who knows what could be going on up there.
I think the United States should declare a pre-emptive war on the moon. We'll call it Operation Moonraker (Cause James Bond is sooooo cool) and we'll obliterate that smug rock and free the peoples of coastal nations and states from the opression and tyranny of the moon's tides.