Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
Personally I think we are justified by being in Iraq. Saddam was a douche. He disobeyed and spat in the face of the U.N. and the world for 12 years on more then a dozen resolutions. Iraq did harbor terrorism, yes people there are other terrorists groups out there besides Al Qeada. Saddam had weapons and just like before he wasn't about to give them up. If you think he didn't have weapons you are purposely turning your a blind eye.
|
Two things come to mind...
1. The guy who runs Kazakhstan is a murdering prick supposedly. In fact, he is supposed to make Saddam look like an amateur. Yet he is backed financially, politically, and god knows how else by the USA. Why is that?
2. The americans have interviewed over 800 Iraqi scientists, politicians, etc. They have all said the same thing independent of each other. There were no biological or chemical weapons or any program to develope the same. You would think that if there "were" such weapons, ONE Of them, just ONE would have said so.
This does not appear to be the case.
I always thought that there "might" turn out to be such weapons etc.
It now appears that there never were. Either the americans have the shittiest intelligence in the world, or, you have been lied to.
Take your pick.