Quote:
Originally posted by Ustwo
The problem with 'The Reagans' wasn't creative dialog, it was what the dialog said. Its one thing to put things that someone MIGHT have said or said something like it, its another to have the character say things totally out of character. The show was designed as a smear of Reagan. He was to be portrayed in a light his critics have always tried to put him in. That he is stupid, confused, racist, and uncaring. I wonder how the same people who have reacted if they included a story about Bill Clinton which included the rape allegations or that Vince Foster was murdered, which was produced by Charlton Heston and Rush Limbaugh? There is at least SOME who claim that those events happened. From what I gather they didn't even interview any of the Reagans or staff members who worked with R.R..
|
How many people have actually seen the movie? The only examples given so far of him saying things out of character is that he says in the movie "Those that live in sin shall die in sin." While he may not have said those exact words, in his authorized biography he reportedly said "Maybe the Lord brought down this plague" because "illicit sex is against the Ten Commandments"
No one's saying the guy raped or killed someone here.
When the movie "DC 9-11" came out a couple months ago, there was no effort by liberals to keep it from being aired. Instead, everyone waited for it to come out and then made the judgement that it was BS. What bothers me in this case is that many people make judgements without having seen the thing and then try to keep other people from seeing it. If the movie is really bad and full of lies, why not let people watch it and decide for themselves?